Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: X2 bug in PCMARk 05 already

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    3,336

    X2 bug in PCMARk 05 already

    http://discuss.futuremark.com/forum/...=5&o=0&fpart=1

    or maybe it is a Nvidia sata controller bug? whatever
    {2012 27imac-3.4i7-680mx-32gb ram-768SSD+External TB Samsung840pro ssd + TB velociraptors-Moto828mkIII/Marantz/Amphion Sound-HPzR30w 2nd monitor}

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    San Diego
    Posts
    287
    First 04 didn't work, now this? That explains why there's only one result from an X2 up there. I have a 4400+ on the way, so this is of interest to me, thanks for sharing. And btw i am running a RAID 0 which i just did today before i saw that....rofl
    DFI SLI-DR | Opteron 170 Mach II | 2x512 G.Skill LE | x1900XTX | 2x250GB Hitachi T7K250 RAID 0 | PCP&C 510 SLI | Creative X-Fi
    My Heatware

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,418
    Not only is our score 1/3 what it should be the project can not be set to published. This could be related to the firewire HDD bug. Where your system reboots if you have a firewire drive connected (might be USB too?).
    Last edited by ewitte; 06-28-2005 at 07:38 PM.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,191
    Yep, I can't get a score on pcmark04, it shows a score of "1" on hard drive performance. I assumed it might be a problem with Asus 1006.2 bios, but looks like that's not the case......
    Asus P8P67-M Pro - Bios 413
    i7-2600K LO41C106
    Cooler Master V8 - Antec 180 Mini
    G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB)
    Sissy OC - 4.6 @ 1.3175 24/7 | 18' Idle - 55' Load
    Windows 7 MS Is Getting Better...

    Personal Site!

  5. #5
    Memory Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    11,651
    could be a san diego/venice and X2 issue http://i4memory.com/showthread.php?p=10126#post10126 ??
    ---

  6. #6
    Xtreme 3DTeam Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Mason, MI... USA
    Posts
    1,199
    Am i hallucinating or does this take 1 840EE or 2 dual core A64's or 4 single core's to be competitive in?
    GA-P35-DS3L no more than 450fsb w/1333 chip
    E6550 stuck at 3150
    V-DATA 2x1gb
    MSI 7900GS 512 3Dmark score in near future
    Old A64 scores2001 39,707 3D03 23,768 3D05 11,394 3D06 5914

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,191
    I'm not certain what's considered at this point to be a decent score, but I just ran it @ 5729....
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	3DMark05.jpg 
Views:	137 
Size:	15.9 KB 
ID:	33312  
    Asus P8P67-M Pro - Bios 413
    i7-2600K LO41C106
    Cooler Master V8 - Antec 180 Mini
    G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB)
    Sissy OC - 4.6 @ 1.3175 24/7 | 18' Idle - 55' Load
    Windows 7 MS Is Getting Better...

    Personal Site!

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,418
    Quote Originally Posted by pcdoc1
    I'm not certain what's considered at this point to be a decent score, but I just ran it @ 5729....
    Are you running RAID? I think it has to do with people runnin off SATA on the nvidia drivers. BTW I get 1000 points higher (still only 2500) if I use the Intel HDD drivers. For some reason that gives me a XP Boot score.

    Eric

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,191
    Quote Originally Posted by ewitte
    Are you running RAID? I think it has to do with people runnin off SATA on the nvidia drivers. BTW I get 1000 points higher (still only 2500) if I use the Intel HDD drivers. For some reason that gives me a XP Boot score.

    Eric
    Nope, I'm not running raid but I'm using SATA drives with the MS drivers...

    Update: Second PCMark05 run.........
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	3DMark05_b.jpg 
Views:	483 
Size:	16.3 KB 
ID:	33323  
    Last edited by pcdoc1; 06-29-2005 at 04:12 AM.
    Asus P8P67-M Pro - Bios 413
    i7-2600K LO41C106
    Cooler Master V8 - Antec 180 Mini
    G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB)
    Sissy OC - 4.6 @ 1.3175 24/7 | 18' Idle - 55' Load
    Windows 7 MS Is Getting Better...

    Personal Site!

  10. #10
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    3,336
    I have heard that if you use the nvidia sata with nvidia drivers you drop like 1000 points. Anyone with X2 that doesn't use nvidia sata have any trouble? Unless they fix this, this test is going to be pretty useless.
    {2012 27imac-3.4i7-680mx-32gb ram-768SSD+External TB Samsung840pro ssd + TB velociraptors-Moto828mkIII/Marantz/Amphion Sound-HPzR30w 2nd monitor}

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,418
    Quote Originally Posted by xgman
    I have heard that if you use the nvidia sata with nvidia drivers you drop like 1000 points. Anyone with X2 that doesn't use nvidia sata have any trouble? Unless they fix this, this test is going to be pretty useless.
    I get about 1200 with Nvidia drivers. The most I've gotten was with the M$ drivers and that was about 2500. It should be closer to 6000. Both tests that look wrong are HDD tests. The M$ drivers only fixes the "XP boot" test.

    Eric

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Chicago, IL USA
    Posts
    330
    you guys should be well over 6000 with X2's because I got about 5970marks with a 3.2E @ 4ghz....or am I just
    Gigabyte GA-EX58-UD5
    Intel i7 930 @4ghz
    EVGA GTX 480
    3x2GB OCZ DDR3-1600
    PCP&C Turbo Cool 860 watt
    Win. 7
    5.5ghz Presler Validation
    Quote Originally Posted by wolfgang
    I thought since that I pay for my internet. I could download anything I want.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Land of Buckeye
    Posts
    2,881
    I tell you guys what, use sil 3114 even worse.
    I just test that @ 3.1g only got 1759 score. lol
    all hd related score are 0

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Posts
    1,191
    Quote Originally Posted by pcdoc1
    Nope, I'm not running raid but I'm using SATA drives with the MS drivers...

    Update: Second PCMark05 run.........
    I'd better clarify this......... I'm using sata drives with the nvidia drivers and using the ms drivers for ide as I was having problems with my optical drives. I'm not having any problems with pcmark05, but I can't get a hardrive score in pcmark04...... Weird
    Asus P8P67-M Pro - Bios 413
    i7-2600K LO41C106
    Cooler Master V8 - Antec 180 Mini
    G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 8GB (2 x 4GB)
    Sissy OC - 4.6 @ 1.3175 24/7 | 18' Idle - 55' Load
    Windows 7 MS Is Getting Better...

    Personal Site!

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    46
    PC Mark 05 v1,01... hittin' my eyes...

    I think we'll "host" a new patch really soon

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,418
    Quote Originally Posted by sluflyer06
    you guys should be well over 6000 with X2's because I got about 5970marks with a 3.2E @ 4ghz....or am I just
    I don't thing "well" over. The one test I saw was about 6000 for an X2 at 2.7Ghz. Although he might of had the bug too, just much less pronounced.

    Eric

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,418
    Quote Originally Posted by Onepagebook
    I tell you guys what, use sil 3114 even worse.
    I just test that @ 3.1g only got 1759 score. lol
    all hd related score are 0
    Howis that worse? I've gotten as low as 1218. I've seen some under 900. I notice absoultely none of the tests over 4000 are DFI boards. There are some Asus ones listed that have the problem though. I also saw both WD and seagate.

    Eric

  18. #18
    Phenom™
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    5,163
    Quote Originally Posted by ewitte
    Howis that worse? I've gotten as low as 1218. I've seen some under 900. I notice absoultely none of the tests over 4000 are DFI boards. There are some Asus ones listed that have the problem though. I also saw both WD and seagate.

    Eric
    Well, imo, 17xx @ 3.1 is defnately worse than 12xx @ 2.? Seems to me that there's a prob with RAID and X2 and pcmark05

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Sugar Land, TX
    Posts
    1,418
    I've got as high as 4755 with one core. It drops back down if I try to use both.

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=8421

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •