Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 82

Thread: OCZ TCC5 Overclocking Results?

  1. #26
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    SLOVENIJA
    Posts
    2,594
    themask : ewwwwww awfull timings
    ASUS P5K-E // E8400 Q746A519
    G.Skill F2-8000CL5D-4GBPQ
    LC 550W GP// XPERTVISION 9600GT

  2. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    6
    haha.. yes it is.. but thats the max OC.. I have it running at 290MHz 2.5-4-3-7 1:1 1T otherwise

  3. #28
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    298
    tcc5 doesnt seem to go 290+ with 2.5-3-3-7

  4. #29
    Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,957
    i got 2.5-4-3-8 32m stable.

    2.5-3-3-6 wouldn't pass more than 2m at the most

    i never tried to give them 2.9v, 2.83 was the most i gave them

    using 618-3 bios right now
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	32m_s.JPG 
Views:	136 
Size:	180.5 KB 
ID:	32949  
    System:
    2600K / 8GB Corsair Vengeance PC15000
    Asus Sabertooth P67 / MSI Twin Frozr II 6950 Crossfire
    corsair 1000hx / Corsair 800D obsidian
    Crucial M4 128GB SSD / Windows 7 Pro
    Cooling:
    Koolance 360 rev 1.1 CPU block / MCR320 QP rad
    OCZ hydropulse 800 pump w/ EK-DCP 4.0 res
    Primochill LRT Black tubing 3/8" ID x 5/8" OD

  5. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    6
    Quote Originally Posted by 4rory
    tcc5 doesnt seem to go 290+ with 2.5-3-3-7
    Mine wont do 2.5-3-3-7 at anything more than 270MHz..

  6. #31
    c[_]
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    18,728
    2.5-3-3-5-1T 2.75v 285mhz
    2.5-4-3-8-2T 2.82v 312mhz

    still working with them, but 1T over 290 is no go as far as I can tell. I suspect the memory controller on my winnie isnt the greatest.. although its not exactly horrible. 8x325 2.5-4-3-x-2T would be perfect.

    EDIT

    2x512 OCZ PC4800 Platinum is what i'm using.
    Last edited by STEvil; 06-22-2005 at 09:22 PM.

    All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    298
    yeah mine max out at 270 with 2.5-3-3-7 and can get close to 280, like 279 with 2.5-4-4-10 then no matter what I do I can't get 280 stable :S Mine only like 2.65 volts anything higher or lower adds errors.

  8. #33
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Chicago, IL
    Posts
    623
    ^^ It is the max of your on die max controller
    Q6600 3.6Ghz @ 1.276v | DFI LP LT P35 | Ballistix Tracer PC2-8500 600Mhz @ 2.074v | GeForce 260 GTX | Auzen X-Fi Prelude | PCP&C 750 | Arch Linux ~ WinXP
    AMD Athlon 64 X2 3800 | DFI LANParty NF4 SLI-DR | 2x512MB G.SKILL PC3200 BH-5 | OCZ PowerStream 520W | Palit GeForce 9600 GT | Gentoo


    Long Live DFI.

  9. #34
    SSD faster than your HDD
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    2,627
    A64 3500+ Socket 939
    ADA3500DEP4AS
    CAAZC 0440MPMW

    DFI NF4 Ultra-D (SLI modded)
    2 x MSI 6600GT
    2 x 512MB PC3200 Plat Rev 2 v1.1 (TCC5)
    OCZ Modstream 520W

    Max 32m SuperPI Stable...2.8V with +0.3 enabled....Drive Strength 7...DATA Drive Level 1....623-1 Bios

    Think thats everything?

    Still Working on Max FSB


  10. #35
    100% Load 24/7
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,495
    Nice results Ryder. I can't get 280 100% stable with trcd of 3. I've even tried with looser timings than what you have. Played around with voltage also. 2.9v seems to be about the best. Any suggestions?
    Main Rig
    i7 2600k l Asus P8P67 l 2x2gb Gskill l GTS450 l Venomous X l XClio 680

  11. #36
    SSD faster than your HDD
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    2,627
    First I would start with tREF...the 166 1.95 in A64 Tweaker actually correspsonds with 2 different settings 2336 and 4708...I am on 2336.
    Max Async and Read Preamble also play a part...although 9 and 7 didn't let me get even 1 MHz higher...it crashed at about 24 min through
    Part of it could be CPU....this Claw clocks ram like mad.
    Play with your Drive and DATA Drive...I bounced all over..your's might need more or less...remember even #'s are nomal, odd #'s are weak at varying levels. TCCD/TCC5 likes weak..but some have good luck with normal strengths.
    It also depends on the Sticks....if you bought yours back when we didn't have 5 speed bins....your a lot more likely to clock high. But even now..I just got these 2 weeks ago (paid for them myself, for those that would say I got "cherry" sticks) and as you can see they do very nicely.

  12. #37
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    298
    how could i test my on die memory controller? What tests to run, Could I do say test till i get 1 or 2 errors in memtest86 then bump up vcore and see if they go away?

    I've tried 1 stick and been in bios memtest at 315mhz. errors like crazy tho. My chip seems to be a masterpeice work of silicone.... so I dont understand how my chip is good but my memory controller is bad, I just ran superpi 1 mil at 3ghz on air with 1.6vcore, when I have a day off work I'll test the winny i have and see what these sticks do.

  13. #38
    SSD faster than your HDD
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI
    Posts
    2,627
    You pretty much know its your memory controller when no matter what you do to timings...waaaay loose and 2T even...won't let you clock higher. The controller just refuses to clock the ram at more MHz.

  14. #39
    100% Load 24/7
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Seattle
    Posts
    1,495
    Quote Originally Posted by RyderOCZ
    First I would start with tREF...the 166 1.95 in A64 Tweaker actually correspsonds with 2 different settings 2336 and 4708...I am on 2336.
    Max Async and Read Preamble also play a part...although 9 and 7 didn't let me get even 1 MHz higher...it crashed at about 24 min through
    Part of it could be CPU....this Claw clocks ram like mad.
    Play with your Drive and DATA Drive...I bounced all over..your's might need more or less...remember even #'s are nomal, odd #'s are weak at varying levels. TCCD/TCC5 likes weak..but some have good luck with normal strengths.
    It also depends on the Sticks....if you bought yours back when we didn't have 5 speed bins....your a lot more likely to clock high. But even now..I just got these 2 weeks ago (paid for them myself, for those that would say I got "cherry" sticks) and as you can see they do very nicely.
    Thanks for the help I have bounced around with the drive strengths. What about skew? Also have tried different values, but not with much luck. I bought these around the end of april when I first noticed the price drop. I'm not dissapointed with these sticks, just trying to get the most out of them
    Main Rig
    i7 2600k l Asus P8P67 l 2x2gb Gskill l GTS450 l Venomous X l XClio 680

  15. #40
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    191
    How would I know if I have TCC5 sticks?
    Athlon 64 3500+
    Dfi Lanparty Ultra-d
    512x2 OCZ PC3200EL Platinum rev2
    X800xt
    300gb Maxtor
    Ocz Powerstream 520w

  16. #41
    Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,957
    you will have a v1.1 printed on your ram labeling. something like this (i had to zoom in a bit on the pic, but you get the idea)
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	tcc5.PNG 
Views:	110 
Size:	77.6 KB 
ID:	33537  
    System:
    2600K / 8GB Corsair Vengeance PC15000
    Asus Sabertooth P67 / MSI Twin Frozr II 6950 Crossfire
    corsair 1000hx / Corsair 800D obsidian
    Crucial M4 128GB SSD / Windows 7 Pro
    Cooling:
    Koolance 360 rev 1.1 CPU block / MCR320 QP rad
    OCZ hydropulse 800 pump w/ EK-DCP 4.0 res
    Primochill LRT Black tubing 3/8" ID x 5/8" OD

  17. #42
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    632
    the word on ocz support forums is that tccd is back on plat rev2's. some ppl got it recently and found v1.0 printed on label.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  18. #43
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    214
    wow, that would be pretty interesting, i ordered mine a couple days ago, i will let you all know

  19. #44
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    632
    i'm also planning to get a gig of that stuff soon, i'm just hoping the price won't go up. i don't give a damn if they're labeled tccd or 5, i know its basically the same stuff. the only thing that matters to me is pricing.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  20. #45
    INTEL inside
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Québec, Canada
    Posts
    3,258
    Hey !
    How can I see if my Rev2 is TCCD/5 ?
    There's nothing of the sticker about the version (1.0 or 1.1)
    Could it be on the PCB ? Cuz on the end of the PCB I can read BP808...on the other end I see "1.1"

    Is it the version ? 1.1 = TCC5 ?
    retired computer enthusiast

  21. #46
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    214
    @super, that just has to do with the brainpower 808 pcb, not the version of the ram

  22. #47
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    298
    you got tccd, from what I understand.
    No markings is tccd
    v1.0 tccd
    v1.1 tcc5

  23. #48
    INTEL inside
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Québec, Canada
    Posts
    3,258
    I mean...it's wrote "1.1" on the PCB not on the sticker

    like this :

    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	ocz_pc3200el.jpg 
Views:	532 
Size:	17.7 KB 
ID:	33540  
    retired computer enthusiast

  24. #49
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Pittsburgh, PA (or Lisbon, Portugal)
    Posts
    430
    The v1.1/v1.0 should be found exactly where ex2cib showed. That 1.1 is another unrelated thing.
    Quote Originally Posted by krille
    Ouchy, go die please, thanks.

  25. #50
    INTEL inside
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Québec, Canada
    Posts
    3,258
    Quote Originally Posted by amrgb
    The v1.1/v1.0 should be found exactly where ex2cib showed. That 1.1 is another unrelated thing.
    are you sure ?
    retired computer enthusiast

Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •