Results of Stock cooled 6800 Ultra PCI-E

[kakaroto]

3Dmark03:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3805674

3Dmark05:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=678560

Pretty nice 1300MHz mem = no artifacts.

Still original bios 5.40.02.25.03.. anyone know if a reference card can flash to 1.5v.

[J-Mag]

wow 1300 on the mem? Can it run that high for hours or just a quick run?

It seems that stock cooling on the memory can suck pretty bad. I know that when I have my memory clocked at 1100-1200 (a 6800GT) artifacts start to appear after an hour or two (have you seen thoose thick cuddly blankets they put in between the RAM and the heatsinks?)

[isp]

Nice results! No love for 01 though?

[kakaroto]

I can run 1300MHz with no problems, with a little airflow.
The Heatsink on the Ultra PCX is 100% COPPER, on the ultra's AGP they are ALU.

I removed the standaard white crap underneath the cooler, replaced with AS

idle 51C in case. Soon I will try Zalman VF700.

3Dmark01 = 29K.

Not to impressive, soon Prometeia on my winnie for some real numbers.

[charlie]

GREAT mem clocks!!
You know, it's amazing... just about EVERYONE runs into a wall on AIR at about 450-460... not like ATI where some go 610 and some go 560... maybe a more consistent process?

C

[J-Mag]

I can run 1300MHz with no problems, with a little airflow.
The Heatsink on the Ultra PCX is 100% COPPER, on the ultra's AGP they are ALU.

I removed the standaard white crap underneath the cooler, replaced with AS

DO you have another fan mounted over the card or something?

Also, the heatsink is 100% copper?!?!?! Even on the BGA GDDR's?

[drcrawn]

3Dmark03:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3805674

3Dmark05:

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?3dm05=678560

Pretty nice 1300MHz mem = no artifacts.

Still original bios 5.40.02.25.03.. anyone know if a reference card can flash to 1.5v.

I think 1.30ghz on the memory without artifacts is about normal for a quality 6800U . Whatever can be said about comparisons to x800xts, these cards usually have great DDR3 memory 450 core seems a tad low to me on the other hand, is that about normal for the pcie cards?. A lot of the agp ones hit 460+ on air, mine hit 467 coolbits test accepted on the stock cooler.
Hey, you might want to try 75.90 instead of 71.84 if you're going to use a non FM driver you'll get a lot more points in both . I *highly* doubt 1.5v will help you on air cooling. These cards prefer cool temps more than voltage, just my opinion. And crank the memory up to 1.3 on the '05 run.

[trakslacker]

man those are some crazy mem clocks. nice going on that.

[eva2000]

woah nice my eVGA 6800U PCI-E totally stock never touched heatsink or stock paste does 450-455mhz core and 1200-1230mhz mem but 1300mhz mem

how much difference between stock white paste and AS ?

[kakaroto]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3808559

460/1377MHz... no 15K, need better cooling to crank up te core...

used 66.93 FM, but 71.84 WHQL is faster...

to Eva: haven't tested that, already removed that stock stuff on core and mem.

[Onepagebook]

ya, Very good MEM clock there,

** I would like to know how to flash Asus EN6800 ultra as well.
they got 425/1100

[kakaroto]

thnx OPB

This week I will receive a Zalman VF700, want to break that 15K with 71.84 WHQL.

[drcrawn]

thnx OPB

This week I will receive a Zalman VF700, want to break that 15K with 71.84 WHQL.

71.84 may be faster than 66.93, but it pales in comparison to 75.90. Have you tried it?

[SainT]

İ have a Asus Extreme Gt..only one

İ can use it 444/1150...

Thats good

[eva2000]

http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k3=3808559

460/1377MHz... no 15K, need better cooling to crank up te core...

used 66.93 FM, but 71.84 WHQL is faster...

to Eva: haven't tested that, already removed that stock stuff on core and mem.

woah i want that core/mem clocks hehe

decided on trying some single eVGA 6800U PCI-E action and interesting results

@455/1215

11x254 2-2-2-6 = 2795mhz 1:1
= 14,611

vs

10x275 2-2-2-6 = 2750mhz 1:1
= 14,651

[isp]

Damn, It's like it doesn't even care about more mem bandwidth.

[kakaroto]

woah i want that core/mem clocks hehe

decided on trying some single eVGA 6800U PCI-E action and interesting results

@455/1215

11x254 2-2-2-6 = 2795mhz 1:1
= 14,611

vs

10x275 2-2-2-6 = 2750mhz 1:1
= 14,651

Nice Eva, is that the fastest Drivers?

[eva2000]

only started using 75.90 came from 71.24 seems 50-100pts faster than 71.24

71.24 is much faster than 66.93 too heh

[kakaroto]

Gonna try it then on 470MHz/1377MHz soon some screens.

[eva2000]

man wish my cards would do a bit more, both do max 455mhz core even 456mhz will freeze!

did you remove those white pads on the mem too and use thermal paste ?

[drcrawn]

Nice Eva, is that the fastest Drivers?

I suggested in TWO prior posts that you should try using 75.90, as it is the fastest.

Hey, you might want to try 75.90 instead of 71.84 if you're going to use a non FM driver you'll get a lot more points in both

71.84 may be faster than 66.93, but it pales in comparison to 75.90. Have you tried it?

[eva2000]

the 75.90 are indeed fast

[drcrawn]

Here's mine with 75.90 LOD +3, no other tweaks. Can't publish a GD thing in '03 or '05 because of the Opteron.

[isp]

So...this is what you've found out?
66.93 =14391
71.24 =?????
75.90 =14667
...good info

PS. Drcrawn, what's ORB say about the opterons?
Guess there aren't too many people with 252s getting on their ass about publishing...

[eva2000]

nah 14,651 and 14,667 both with 75.90