http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...103-503&depa=0
3400+...I didn't know it was coming out on 939?
http://www.newegg.com/app/ViewProduc...103-503&depa=0
3400+...I didn't know it was coming out on 939?
Neither did I....its either
A.) Newegg messed up
B.) AMD is fixing their model numbers.
The processor in the pic says:
ADA3400DEP4AZ
CBAUC 0432RPOW
in case that helps. Anyone know how to tell if this is a S939 or S754 chip?
Last edited by jjcom; 10-01-2004 at 08:49 PM.
Newegg must've mixed up somehow... that's just weird.
Bedroom: D201GLY2, Celeron 220 (1.2ghz/512k cache); 1gb DDR2 PC-5300; Geforce 6200 PCI
-----------------
Gaming: Core 2 Duo E4500@2.93ghz (266x11); Abit IP35-E; 3gb Crucial Ballistix PC5300@400mhz (4-4-4-15); XFX Geforce 8800GS@680/800 10123 3dmark06
-----------------
HTPC: Athlon 64 X2 BE-2300 (1.9ghz); ECS mATX mb; 2gb Crucial PC5300; Radeon HD2600 Pro 256mb (DXVA HA in BD and HD-DVD)
Originally posted by Thunderbird1Ghz(Geforce4Ti4200) at Sharky Forums
And you arent gonna believe this, but that DVD rom will even read regular CD roms!!!!!!!
arnt the new 9nm ones all 939? Could this be one of them?
no, the first 90nm-CPUs will be all S.939 - 3000+ / 3200+ / 3500+
but newegg mixed up, because the OPN would be a S.939-CPU
ADA3400DEP4AZ
D = S.939
----- AMD K6-2 300 "Chomper" xxxxx xxxx xxxx /// 300 MHz @ 2,200 V -----
----- AMD Athlon XP 1700+ "Thouroghbred B" JIUHB 0306 MPMW /// 2400 MHz @ 1,900 V -----
----- AMD Athlon XP-M 2500+ "Barton" AQXEA 0327 UPMW /// 2450 MHz @ 1,850 V -----
----- AMD Athlon XP-M 2600+ "Barton" IQYHA 0401 XPMW /// 2500 MHz @ 1,750 V -----
----- AMD Athlon 64 3000+ "Newcastle CG" xxxxx 0418 WPMW /// 2600 MHz @ 1,600 V -----
----- AMD Athlon 64 3200+ "Winchester D0" xxxxx 0433 SPMW /// 2750 MHz @ 1,616 V -----
----- AMD Phenom II X2 555 BE "Callisto" xxxxx xxxx xxxx /// 4080MHz @ 1,375 V -----
----- AMD Ryzen "Zen" xxxxx xxxx xxxx /// TBA @ TBA -----
It does have a D. So could AMD be fixing their model numbers?
Weird tiger direct has it too. http://www.tigerdirect.com/applicati...102&CatId=1177
The difference on the 3400+ is 800HTT vs 1000 on the 3500+. The only place i've seen this was on a product roadmap somewhere.
They were talking about it for awhile at OC's forums but i don't think they ever caught on to what the difference was.
GA-P35-DS3L no more than 450fsb w/1333 chip
E6550 stuck at 3150
V-DATA 2x1gb
MSI 7900GS 512 3Dmark score in near future
Old A64 scores2001 39,707 3D03 23,768 3D05 11,394 3D06 5914
Wouldn't a 3400+ be running @ 2.2Ghz instead of 2.4? The 3800+ is 2.4Ghz right?
Last edited by HKPolice; 10-13-2004 at 07:54 AM.
that would make kinda sense, and the 3500 would stay 130nm
hmm, is it possibly a cheaper alternative to a 3500+ without dual channel? sop basically a 754 3400+ but just with the right pin ou tso upgrading cpu is easier?
Failed 3500+ with one faulty mem controller? Thats of course guessing how it gets that speed rating. its the only thing i can think of really.
Mail Me | 3500+ , dfi sli-dr, g-skill la, 2x6800gt, 600w pcz, stacker case, air cooled
thats the only difference guys...Originally Posted by Poki
Yep, and I doubt that that extra HTT is worth the extra 100 point rating.
Bedroom: D201GLY2, Celeron 220 (1.2ghz/512k cache); 1gb DDR2 PC-5300; Geforce 6200 PCI
-----------------
Gaming: Core 2 Duo E4500@2.93ghz (266x11); Abit IP35-E; 3gb Crucial Ballistix PC5300@400mhz (4-4-4-15); XFX Geforce 8800GS@680/800 10123 3dmark06
-----------------
HTPC: Athlon 64 X2 BE-2300 (1.9ghz); ECS mATX mb; 2gb Crucial PC5300; Radeon HD2600 Pro 256mb (DXVA HA in BD and HD-DVD)
Originally posted by Thunderbird1Ghz(Geforce4Ti4200) at Sharky Forums
And you arent gonna believe this, but that DVD rom will even read regular CD roms!!!!!!!
well it makes for a cheaper processor at *basicly* the same preformance...
OK...I need to point this out.
the 3500 only should have gotten a 3400 speed rating.
So AMD could be making 90nm 3400 S939 chips.
The Hypertransport bus is limited by the board not the chip. Those chips can 1600/2000 HT speeds, there just isn't the boards that can do that.
yea, and i believe the 3800+ should be 3600+/3700+, and the 4000+ should be 3800+... caus i dunno if a 2.4ghz a64 is gonna keep up with a 4ghz p4... 1.6ghz might stick it to the a64 in this case...
3500=3400
3800=3600
4000=3700-3800
FX-55= 3900-4000.
that what I think.
http://www.c627627.com/AMD/Athlon64/
that really puts it into perspective. there is a 3400+ thats 2.4ghz. theres a 4000+ thats 2.4ghz. thats a difference of 600+, for SC -> DC ram, and an extra 512mb L2 cache... not happening...
another thing to look at, the s939 3400+/3500+ block... the next one down is a 3800+ block... that just doesnt flow with the rest of the chart... having only 200+ incriments...
i'd like to see a big arsed cpu round up with every single variant of the A64's(not semprons), plus comparable P4 cpu's in a variety of tests, to see how they really compare...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks