HTT - LTD (x2 - x3 - x4 - x5) BENCHES

**aldamon** · 08-25-2004, 08:08 AM

With your FSB at 250, and memory 1:1, and a 2X HT multi, you're getting DDR500 and an HT of 500. Just a guess, but could there be a benefit to having the HT match the memory speeds?

**andL64** · 08-25-2004, 08:31 AM

Program HT x1 HT x 2 HT x 4

3D2k01 21.871 22.138 22.207

3D2k03 7098 7130 7140

PC2002
cpu 7131 7121 7135
mem. 8840 8939 8996

Aquamark N/A 48,564 48,884

PC2004 4286 4363 4396

well i have tested with epoX KDA3+ (nforce3250Gb) with 4.27 latest nforce drivers i think...

amd athlon 64 3200+ c0 clawhammer 2202Mhz
Corsair BH-6 @ 2-3-3-7 200.4 Mhz
cat. 4.8 by Igor Pavlov (best driver i ve tested)
MSI RX9800 @ 438/378

i cant agree with dagalidis but since i saw his thread i thought i must bench too

seems to do not as much on the epoX board i wouldnt say that its with all nforce boards so... (more reviews

plz)

least but not last i want to say i only benched the 3dmarks once and i think the aquamark score on HTx1 would be little bit less than with HTx2

seEn andL

**Dagalidis** · 08-26-2004, 04:21 AM

Nice Post andL64.....

I will try again with my new ABIT mobo 1.1 Rev and post some new findings....

**andL64** · 08-26-2004, 04:53 AM

Originally posted by Dagalidis
Nice Post andL64.....

I will try again with my new ABIT mobo 1.1 Rev and post some new findings....

so plz do so!

we need more reviews i want to know if its on alle nforce3 like that...and also k8t800(pro)

and dagalidis i wanted to do this since a few times but i didnt recognize some real difference so i didnt looked at it exatcly but since i saw ur thread i MUST do it

i ll bench other benches like sisoft i think memory get s also a little bit better but why it didnt use HTT or does it?

we ll see and also i ll bench with the new "hell on earth" board if i can get one

soon i ll also get a pre tested cpu then i ll give ya some more...

seEn andL

PS: lets see how high ur HTT could get !?! i ran 280x4 without problems
...and how the hell i could post a chart , list ?

**Dagalidis** · 08-26-2004, 08:40 AM

Was able to begin booting at 350 x 6 @ LTD X 3 but Crassed on Windows Loading SCreen.....

Damn it was to close but my mobo need Aircondition because i have 39 C Case temp

and dont help for high FSB OC.....

**IvanAndreevich** · 08-26-2004, 08:48 PM

Dagalidis
Hmm.. can you maybe bench same resulting HT speed achieved by different methods? For example 5x200, 4x250, 3x333

I wonder if that will make any difference @ all.

**Dagalidis** · 08-27-2004, 02:58 AM

Last night was trying to find my max 1:1 free of errors using MEMTEST 1.5 as mem diagnostic tool....

I was able to hit the amazing 262 FSB using ONLY 2.62 Vddr and I was really socked….
I the most of my OC I used 2.8 Vddr as default option because I thought this was the only way to get my system stable….

I was wrong… my ADATA VITESTA DDR500 using Hynix –D5 chips just love low vddr …

I conclude that CPU mem controller is heating or don’t like more that 263 MHZ because no matter what I do this was the max acceptable OC for 1:1 FSB/MEM….

Just check my steps at the XLS table and make your judgment……

MEMTEST = 10 loops of 5th test
3D = AQUAMARK03 Bench
SPI = Super PI 2MB

It took me a lot of time to have long Tests....

**Dagalidis** · 08-27-2004, 09:45 AM

I will Run Tweeker to see what changes make my ABIT when change LTD when return home.....

ADATA is a very good perfomer MEM and those Hynix D5 chips are clocking well and with low VDDR as you see at my EXCEL.....

**saaya** · 08-27-2004, 11:16 AM

wow those are amazing results! extremely interesting!

**Dagalidis** · 08-27-2004, 11:23 AM

Yes.... MEM Controller sufer from heat and water is needed for higher 1:1 clocking .....
But ADATA is JUST GREAT

**IvanAndreevich** · 08-27-2004, 03:17 PM

So you use #18? I mean the FSB/mem config. Very nice with 1T at those speeds with the volts! Is it not possible to tighten to 8-3-3, at least?

**andL64** · 08-27-2004, 07:49 PM

eh...

nice nice nice i heard of it that the a data likes low voltages ver very much and thell ll do not even mor with xtreme or higher voltage so...

but i got bh-6 how far can i go ? i think 3,2V shouldnt be a problem... i ll only get little bit nervous cause of the mem controller in side the amd64

bu no risk no fun!

soOn awaiting the dfi board

seEn andL

**Dagalidis** · 08-28-2004, 11:37 AM

Originally posted by andL64
soOn awaiting the dfi board

seEn andL

Not only you.....
Believe me .... lol

**pkrew** · 08-30-2004, 08:29 AM

Not sure how you ran the test as far as order. Meaning did you run LDT 2, then 3, then 4, then 5 and rebooted before each run. If that's the case then reversing the order may give different results

**iceman2g** · 08-30-2004, 10:23 AM

Dagalidis great findings.

btw I think you mean LDT.

**Dagalidis** · 08-30-2004, 09:09 PM

Originally posted by iceman2g
Dagalidis great findings.

btw I think you mean LDT.

Correct ........ Sorry for Mistake....

Not sure how you ran the test as far as order. Meaning did you run LDT 2, then 3, then 4, then 5 and rebooted before each run. If that's the case then reversing the order may give different results

No....
I was starting from LDT 5 and when not passed MEMTEST or Windows Benches then searching the best BIOS option to make system stable again...
So if needed LDT decreased back to X4 - X3 as you see at the EXCEL....

**Dagalidis** · 08-31-2004, 10:48 PM

CodeRed Sorry for this late reply…..
I have screens of A64Tweeker of LDT X 5 & X4 but nothing changed…
I’ve also tested with LDT X3 – X2 – X1 but nothing new appears on Settings…

This is LDT X 5 Screen…

**Dagalidis** · 08-31-2004, 10:57 PM

This is LDT X 4 Screen....
and as you see ... nothing changed.....

**Dagalidis** · 08-31-2004, 11:03 PM

Here is Unbuffered Score of SANDRA MEM @ 260 1:1 @ LDT X 4 @ 2.6 VDDR

**CodeRed** · 09-01-2004, 12:04 AM

Originally posted by Dagalidis
CodeRed Sorry for this late reply…..
I have screens of A64Tweeker of LDT X 5 & X4 but nothing changed…
I’ve also tested with LDT X3 – X2 – X1 but nothing new appears on Settings…

This is LDT X 5 Screen…

Oh well it was worth a try

There are a few more LDT registers, maybe I need to make another version

Or easier to just dump the values with WPCREDIT (bus 0, device 24, function 0).

Thanks for doing the testing.

**pkrew** · 09-01-2004, 06:05 AM

Originally posted by Dagalidis

No....
I was starting from LDT 5 and when not passed MEMTEST or Windows Benches then searching the best BIOS option to make system stable again...
So if needed LDT decreased back to X4 - X3 as you see at the EXCEL....

Maybe I missed something I was refering to the 3d runs at the start of the thread

**Kinsy** · 09-01-2004, 10:51 AM

Just a small note.

Ive played with many Adata sticks in the past, and found that they have hated any more than 2.7v.

Try using 2.7v as your top limit; might help you reach 270-280

**Dagalidis** · 09-01-2004, 09:19 PM

Originally posted by Kinsy
Just a small note.

Ive played with many Adata sticks in the past, and found that they have hated any more than 2.7v.

Try using 2.7v as your top limit; might help you reach 270-280

Hmmm...
Yes i know what you mean...
I found that 2.6 VDDR @ 260 1:1 is the best combination right now....

BTW i hope VTT mod will help to get more than 262 1:1 when watercooling be ready and push VDDR up to 3.2 Volts...

**Dagalidis** · 10-13-2004, 10:48 PM

Nothing new about ABIT @ Via Chipset to POST....

But this weekend i will try my new DFI board and run same TESTs again to compare with old (Via Chipset)....

Wish me luck with DFI.....

**reject** · 10-14-2004, 05:29 AM

dam it i think have DT43 chips and i need 3.2v to get to 270 1T.
that cant be stable? i only get 2200/2270 unbuffered

Thread: HTT - LTD (x2 - x3 - x4 - x5) BENCHES

Thread Tools

Search Thread

Rate This Thread

Display

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions