but if you make OC iGPU and APU at the same clock(Trinity OC as Richland), results will be the similar. I tested it...maybe only 2-5% difference, because function of Turbo at Richland is not the same.
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Stilt: I made compare there: http://www.coolaler.com/showthread.p...=1#post3140835
without Ice storm (some bug at my score) are results very similar
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
its bug of CPU-Z...it was dualchannle. GPU I set as A10-6800K (and CPU clocks too)
ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread
Aussie retailer PC Case Gear has these slated as a June 4th release
-PB
-Project Sakura-
Intel i7 860 @ 4.0Ghz, Asus Maximus III Formula, 8GB G-Skill Ripjaws X F3 (@ 1600Mhz), 2x GTX 295 Quad SLI
2x 120GB OCZ Vertex 2 RAID 0, OCZ ZX 1000W, NZXT Phantom (Pink), Dell SX2210T Touch Screen, Windows 8.1 Pro
Koolance RP-401X2 1.1 (w/ Swiftech MCP35X), XSPC EX420, XSPC X-Flow 240, DT Sniper, EK-FC 295s (w/ RAM Blocks), Enzotech M3F Mosfet+NB/SB
The APU's are getting just about perfect to abandon dedicated cards, just need to add sidechannel memory access to them so you can drop a stick of GDDR5 in for more performance![]()
All along the watchtower the watchmen watch the eternal return.
http://semiaccurate.com/2013/05/31/a...-a-big-secret/
What's charlie talking about?
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
My Videos
GRID Demolition Derby * GRID Camaro vs. Mustang * Audiosurf - Speed Racer
I Shot the Hosties * Slightly Stupid * Dump Truck
Intel Haswell 4770K * 2x8GB Mushkin Redline DDR3 1866 CL9 * Asus Maximus VI Gene * Sapphire 7870 GHz Edition
500GB Samsung 840 Series SSD + 2TB WD Raid Edition 3 magnetic * SilverStone Temjin case * Corsair TX750 PSU * Corsair H60 water cooler * Win7 Pro x64
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
That may be your opinion but SemiAccurate posts a lot of interesting and accurate information months before many other sites copy and post it up.
It's worth noting that subscribers get the info. first and more in-depth reports than the freebie stories posted at a later date on SemiAccurate. You don't actually need to subscribe at all to read many of the stories immediately and the special additional stories a few weeks on.
Last edited by AMDforME; 05-31-2013 at 02:48 PM.
After many sleepless hours for AMD's engineers and some creative forensic analysis, AMD discovered that they could gain considerable improvement in the performance of the current architecture by further tweaking the layout of the transistors. The process has begun in Richland, but by the next generation, viewers will notice the die shot resembles a fingerprint. Who knew Jerry Sander's impact on AMD would continue by producing the global optimum for all performance metrics encoded in his loops and whirls. A big "thumbs up" to Jerry.
-Project Sakura-
Intel i7 860 @ 4.0Ghz, Asus Maximus III Formula, 8GB G-Skill Ripjaws X F3 (@ 1600Mhz), 2x GTX 295 Quad SLI
2x 120GB OCZ Vertex 2 RAID 0, OCZ ZX 1000W, NZXT Phantom (Pink), Dell SX2210T Touch Screen, Windows 8.1 Pro
Koolance RP-401X2 1.1 (w/ Swiftech MCP35X), XSPC EX420, XSPC X-Flow 240, DT Sniper, EK-FC 295s (w/ RAM Blocks), Enzotech M3F Mosfet+NB/SB
SemiAccurate isn't a "leak site". Their info. is generally right on the money, IME. Sure there might be an occasion when there report isn't 100% accurate but for the most part they do a good job and actually research before they report, unlike "leak sites" who have moles telling them part of the story.
SemiAccurate media is a pure shame. Charlie Demerdjian is the worst tech journalist on earth.
The guy always whine about bad journalists who tell BS but no one can beat it at this game.
He really seems near insane.
IGN reporting AMD has mini movie of Core Warriors utilizing and winning with the force of APU HSA Fusion technology. With E3 starting soon, the new next-gen Sony PS4 and Microsoft Xbox One will also showcase the power of AMD Jaguar and APU HSA Fusion technology.
AMD - Invincible
AMD - HSA Intelligent Computing Architecture
http://sites.amd.com/us/promo/produc...nvincible.aspx
Richland is in stock on the egg http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...&name=Richland
Richland desktop APUs are in-stock and shipping.
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...676&isNodeId=1
AMD Richland = rebadged CPUs , rebadged iGPUs , rebadged chipsets =Disappoint , Bring ST, i want to replace my old Athlon with ST if AMD promises that ST can challenge Haswell.
CPU : Athlon X2 7850,Clock:3000 at 1.20 | Mobo : Biostar TA790GX A2+ Rev 5.1 | PSU : Green GP535A | VGA : Sapphire 5770 Clock:910,Memory:1300 | Memory : Patriot 2x2 GB DDR2 800 CL 5-5-5-15 | LCD : AOC 931Sw
Richland = more clockspeed with less power draw, less heat and higher OCs on air. iGPU should also OC higher while the whole package will be drawing less power Vs overclocked 5800K.
You posted complete nonsense. If you don't understand Richland you should educate yourself. "informal" has it correct. There are some other goodies with Richland APUs that people have not discovered yet either. You just need to know where to look. It's right in front of your face.![]()
Bookmarks