MMM
Page 18 of 49 FirstFirst ... 81516171819202128 ... LastLast
Results 426 to 450 of 1214

Thread: Geforce Titan - GK110 will be a consumer part

  1. #426
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Peoples Republic of Kalifornia
    Posts
    1,541
    Quote Originally Posted by boxleitnerb View Post
    There is/was no GK100, at least not in any conceivable form. Drawing boards maybe.
    nVidia has always used the code name GK110 which actually had it's first tape out in December 2011 and was completely functional in May, 2012.

    "If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defense which is paramount to all positive forms of government"
    -- Alexander Hamilton

  2. #427
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Valencia, Espaņa
    Posts
    146
    DUAL GK110, will be possible?

  3. #428
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Ankara Turkey
    Posts
    2,631
    Quote Originally Posted by Handrox View Post
    DUAL GK110, will be possible?
    single one with this price ... maybe ... at most 10 of them just for show business.


    When i'm being paid i always do my job through.

  4. #429
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    588
    Quote Originally Posted by Handrox View Post
    DUAL GK110, will be possible?
    I do not think so, but may Dual GPU come from the GK114 -not GK110......Who knows
    WOOOOOF

  5. #430
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Valencia, Espaņa
    Posts
    146
    Imagine a sigle GPU POWER GK110 accompanied by a DUAL POWER GK110 is something very interesting.

  6. #431
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    588
    Quote Originally Posted by Handrox View Post
    Imagine a sigle GPU POWER GK110 accompanied by a DUAL POWER GK110 is something very interesting.
    Certainly you will be able to cook it
    WOOOOOF

  7. #432
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    323
    Dual GK110 on a single GPU with a waterblock + radiator + pump included would be quite nice. All for 500$... please?

  8. #433
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Valencia, Espaņa
    Posts
    146
    Quote Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal View Post
    Certainly you will be able to cook it
    Is it? nothing that does not resolve a WC

  9. #434
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    338
    ARES II is Water Cooled too, why not dual GK110

  10. #435
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    323
    ARES II is Water Cooled too, why not dual GK110
    At the price they are selling it (1500$) they should do Dual GK110... otherwise it's way overpriced.

  11. #436
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    588
    Quote Originally Posted by Handrox View Post
    Is it? nothing that does not resolve a WC


    if we're talking about the heat of Dual GK110 There other solutions such waterblock And the rest of the pieces their own.this may Happen....but i don't think so.
    But if that happened.....damn that will be a big Bodybuilder muscles dogg
    WOOOOOF

  12. #437
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Valencia, Espaņa
    Posts
    146
    1000€...


    Link

  13. #438
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    588
    Quote Originally Posted by Handrox View Post
    1000€...


    Link
    GTX Titan will come 800$-900$ I'm sure of it
    WOOOOOF

  14. #439
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Ankara Turkey
    Posts
    2,631
    imo it is the entry price in 2 weeks it will settle


    When i'm being paid i always do my job through.

  15. #440
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Valencia, Espaņa
    Posts
    146

    http://www.2compute.net/Asus/GTXTITAN-6GD5.htm

    Quote Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal View Post


    if we're talking about the heat of Dual GK110 There other solutions such waterblock And the rest of the pieces their own.this may Happen....but i don't think so.
    But if that happened.....damn that will be a big Bodybuilder muscles dogg
    that price makes me very discouraged, if maybe lower the price of the GTX 680 I make an SLI ...
    Last edited by Handrox; 02-15-2013 at 04:31 AM.

  16. #441
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Posts
    588
    that price makes me very discouraged, if maybe lower the price of the GTX 680 I make an SLI ...
    the price of GTX 680 will be lower I think between $400-$440, soon

    you can delete this post by go to Edit Post and than to Delete Post and Delete this post in the following manner
    WOOOOOF

  17. #442
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Waterblocks, allready ready for Titan .

    Got a mail from EK waterblock.. a poll for vote for the design of their next waterblock.. for the Titan..

    EK Water Blocks, Ljubljana based premium water cooling gear manufacturer, has opened a poll on EK-ThinkCell site where you can vote and choose your favourite design for the upcoming nVidia Geforce Titan Full Cover series water block as well as the redesign of the existing EK-Supremacy CPU water block.
    http://thinkcell.ekwb.com/idea/new-f...oose-your-best

    Just for the record. The VGA card in the back is NOT Geforce Titan!
    ( all my hope of getting a pcb screen ruined )
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  18. #443
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Green Bay, WI
    Posts
    616
    Quote Originally Posted by Lanek View Post
    Waterblocks, allready ready for Titan .

    Got a mail from EK waterblock.. a poll for vote for the design of their next waterblock.. for the Titan..



    http://thinkcell.ekwb.com/idea/new-f...oose-your-best


    ( all my hope of getting a pcb screen ruined )
    Hopefully the clean design without all those circles wins.

  19. #444
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Posts
    317
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrew LB View Post
    nVidia has always used the code name GK110 which actually had it's first tape out in December 2011 and was completely functional in May, 2012.
    And the question is : why -then- nvidia hasn't released it around that time to completely dominate the market given that AMD would had seemed to be unable to respond for -close to-two years in a row.

    Is there a weird law against monopoly which would disable one of the competitors to release something that far better from competition? It seems senseless to me that nvidia gave the chance to AMD to breathe and even momentarily take the crown (driver update), what was the point of that?

  20. #445
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    utah ogden
    Posts
    110
    I normally don't post but it really seems to me the vast majority of people here and around the net are overlooking the most basic detail with this card.

    When a company has a product, one of of dividing into two different categories is, products that are made to sell, and products that are sold because they are made. This may seem like the same thing, but it is very different, almost all gpu's made for consumers are the first category, while Titan is a rare exception and falls into the second category.

    Titan gpu's are not made to be sold as Titan's, they are K20x's that don't quite make it. So what they do is take a k20x, disable one of the core clusters from 15 to 14, remove the ECC memory, and then use the bios to turn DP units into integer unit to increase the graphics performance while killing their server use in one blow.

    So when your asking yourself why didn't these come out earlier, it was a function of how long it took them to get a stockpile of these mostly working but not quite par chips. Also the sale price is the same, to get as much money from them they can, without gaining too much ire from consumers for exploiting the demand.

    So there it is, this gpu is not made due to any sort of consumer demand verse profit made, so stop thinking in terms as if it was. The single gpu performance crown and all that other stuff here, is just bonus, nothing more.

  21. #446
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Posts
    594
    K20X has 14 clusters. And it is not really clear if the DP units are SP capable. Assuming there are dedicated DP units, that is. That much is not really clear.

  22. #447
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    Quote Originally Posted by boxleitnerb View Post
    K20X has 14 clusters. And it is not really clear if the DP units are SP capable. Assuming there are dedicated DP units, that is. That much is not really clear.
    I was ask me the same thing some days ago..

    Anandtech presentation of K20x
    Fundamentally GK110 is a highly enhanced if not equally specialized version of the Kepler architecture. The SMX, first introduced with GK104, is the basis of GK110. Each GK104 SMX contained 192 FP32 CUDA cores, 8 FP64 CUDA cores, 256KB of register file space, 64KB of L1 cache, 48KB of uniform cache. In turn it was fed by 4 warp schedulers, each with two dispatch units, allowing GK104 to issue instructions from warps in a superscalar manner.

    GK110 builds on that by keeping the same general design, but tweaking it for GK110’s compute-focused needs. The single biggest change here is that rather than 8 FP64 CUDA cores GK110 has 64 FP64 CUDA cores, giving it 8 times the FP64 performance of a GK104 SMX. The SMXes are otherwise very similar at a high level, featuring the same 256KB of register file space, 64KB of L1 cache, 48KB of uniform cache, and the same warp scheduler structure. This of course does not include a number of low level changes that further set apart GK104 and GK110.
    Last edited by Lanek; 02-15-2013 at 01:16 PM.
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  23. #448
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    utah ogden
    Posts
    110
    Opps delete post I was mistaken.

    K20x while it has 15 clusters, only 14 are active, K20 has 13 like I thought.

    Details from the anandtech review of the K20, http://www.anandtech.com/show/6446/n...rrives-at-last .
    Last edited by hennyo; 02-15-2013 at 01:38 PM.

  24. #449
    One-Eyed Killing Machine
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Inside a pot
    Posts
    6,340
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevethegreat View Post
    And the question is : why -then- nvidia hasn't released it around that time to completely dominate the market given that AMD would had seemed to be unable to respond for -close to-two years in a row.

    Is there a weird law against monopoly which would disable one of the competitors to release something that far better from competition? It seems senseless to me that nvidia gave the chance to AMD to breathe and even momentarily take the crown (driver update), what was the point of that?
    Leading another company to bankruptcy in a 2 player battle ends the battle, and the winner doesn't really win anything ( anti-monopoly laws mainly )
    Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.

    -Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.

    Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero

  25. #450
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Santa Barbara, CA
    Posts
    794
    Quote Originally Posted by Stevethegreat View Post
    ...AMD would had seemed to be unable to respond for -close to-two years in a row.
    Due to driver enhancements last year (specifically 12.11), AMD managed to outperform the GTX680 with the HD7970s by the end of 2012(GCN latency issues aside) and costs a full 20% less. (Link)
    Last edited by 3lfk1ng; 02-15-2013 at 04:02 PM.
    Computer: Intel i7-4770k | Asus Z87 Maximus VI Impact | 240GB Corsair Force GT | 240GB OCZ Vertex 3 | 16GB G.Skill Trident X 2400MHz | EVGA GTX690 Hydro Copper 4GB | Corsair AX850 | Steelseries 7G | Logitech G500 | 27" 2560x1440 Overlord Tempest X270OC 120Hz S-IPS
    Cooling: Koolance 380i CPU block | Swiftech Hydro Copper GPU block | EK X3 150 Reservoir | EK X-TOP D5 PWM drive | PrimoChill PrimoFlex PRO LRT Bloodshed red | Alphacool NexXxos 240mm XT45 | Alphacool NexXxos 280mm UT60 | Bitspower Fittings | 4x Bitfenix Spectre Pro 120mm | 2x Bitfenix Spectre Pro 140mm | Lamptron FC-5V2
    Case: Custom modded matte black Caselabs Mercury S3

Page 18 of 49 FirstFirst ... 81516171819202128 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •