MMM
Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Computex 2011: No Llano launch as AMD focuses on tablets

  1. #1
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,445

    Computex 2011: No Llano launch as AMD focuses on tablets

    The surprise at AMD’s Computex press conference today was as much what the company did not show as what it did discuss. The Llano processor, the company’s first mainstream APU and its first 32nm processor, was largely a no-show. Instead AMD announced a new line of APUs for tablets, known as the Z Series.

    AMD sought to put the best possible spin on the lack of Llano. Company executives said that Llano has been shipping to customers and will be launched at a separate event in mid-June.

    To illustrate this, he held up what he said was one of the first Trinity APUs, the processor that will replace Llano in 2012. AMD did confirm that the Llano APUs would be branded the A Series and available in A4, A6 and A8 versions, but these details were already widely known.

    Bergman also said that AMD’s high-end Zambezi processor, which is a traditional CPU designed for systems with discrete graphics, was “looking great” (though he offered no details) and added that the Orochi server version was on track for release in the third quarter.


    tablets



    nice, orochi is on track that "should" mean that bulldozer is on track. ohh trinity!
    [MOBO] Asus CrossHair Formula 5 AM3+
    [GPU] ATI 6970 x2 Crossfire 2Gb
    [RAM] G.SKILL Ripjaws X Series 16GB (4 x 4GB) 240-Pin DDR3 1600
    [CPU] AMD FX-8120 @ 4.8 ghz
    [COOLER] XSPC Rasa 750 RS360 WaterCooling
    [OS] Windows 8 x64 Enterprise
    [HDD] OCZ Vertex 3 120GB SSD
    [AUDIO] Logitech S-220 17 Watts 2.1

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    1,195
    well tablets are future no doubt for that but would be nice to see some Llano action
    Quote Originally Posted by LesGrossman View Post
    So for the last 3 months Nvidia talked about Uniengine and then Uniengine and more Uniengine and finally Uniengine. And then takes the best 5 seconds from all the benchmark run, makes a graph and then proudly shows it everywhere.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Posts
    970
    How could anyone writing an article on a tech site imply that Llano is delayed because it isn't launching at Computex? Do these people lack any sort of common sense whatsoever? Trying to throw the best possible light on it? lol Actually it sounds exactly like the author trying to throw the worst possible spin on it. Surely this person realizes that AMD's Fusion Developer Summit is in 2 weeks??? WTF would AMD not launch their Fusion APU at their Fusion Developer Summit. Lots of wishful thinking in articles popping up here and there.

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    399
    AMD sought to put the best possible spin on the lack of Llano.
    *facepalm*

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Vienna, Austria
    Posts
    1,940
    Quote Originally Posted by DarthShader View Post
    *facepalm*
    Llano launch date is fusion developer summit in 2 weeks, afaik there were no plans to launch it on computex
    Core i7 2600k|HD 6950|8GB RipJawsX|2x 128gb Samsung SSD 830 Raid0|Asus Sabertooth P67
    Seasonic X-560|Corsair 650D|2x WD Red 3TB Raid1|WD Green 3TB|Asus Xonar Essence STX


    Core i3 2100|HD 7770|8GB RipJawsX|128gb Samsung SSD 830|Asrock Z77 Pro4-M
    Bequiet! E9 400W|Fractal Design Arc Mini|3x Hitachi 7k1000.C|Asus Xonar DX


    Dell Latitude E6410|Core i7 620m|8gb DDR3|WXGA+ Screen|Nvidia Quadro NVS3100
    256gb Samsung PB22-J|Intel Wireless 6300|Sierra Aircard MC8781|WD Scorpio Blue 1TB


    Harman Kardon HK1200|Vienna Acoustics Brandnew|AKG K240 Monitor 600ohm|Sony CDP 228ESD

  6. #6
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Hungary (EU)
    Posts
    1,376
    Quote Originally Posted by generics_user View Post
    Llano launch date is fusion developer summit in 2 weeks, afaik there were no plans to launch it on computex
    Exactly.

    -

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Hopatcong, NJ
    Posts
    1,078
    might be a hard launch perhaps? If customers received Llano shipments in April 2011, wonder if Laptops will be available on Day 1 of official Llano launch

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    145.21.4.???
    Posts
    319
    AMD sought to put the best possible spin on the lack of Llano.
    Now this can explain why Zambezi is pushed behind.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Why wouldn't you launch at computex? It seems like alot of publicity is to be found and better yet, all your partners Motherboard look that much more appetizing when you actually have a processor to accompany it.
    Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
    6gb OCZ platinum
    4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
    2*640 WD Blacks
    750GB Seagate.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    282
    I bet Llano will be delayed to Sep as Bulldozer.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    the plan was bulldozer at computex, not llano. as these guys said above, llano is coming later.

    990 chipset boards launched at computex. bulldozer was supposed to with them

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Berlin
    Posts
    275
    Quote Originally Posted by bamtan2 View Post
    the plan was bulldozer at computex, not llano. as these guys said above, llano is coming later.

    990 chipset boards launched at computex. bulldozer was supposed to with them
    According to the launch plan slide BD was not planned to be launched at Computex. But we also saw (faked?) slides of Zambezi launch in mid June and a direct connection to E3 show on a Gigabyte slide.
    Now on Twitter: @Dresdenboy!
    Blog: http://citavia.blog.de/

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •