Page 3 of 19 FirstFirst 12345613 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 466

Thread: HD 6990 Preview/Review

  1. #51
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    939
    I don't think this is the card AMD would have released if the 590 wasn't on the horizon. They've done some very interesting things with power management but 450w in top gear is scary.

    I guess we'll see next month.

  2. #52
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Bangkok,Thailand (DamHot)
    Posts
    2,693
    AMD Fail
    Intel Core i5 6600K + ASRock Z170 OC Formula + Galax HOF 4000 (8GBx2) + Antec 1200W OC Version
    EK SupremeHF + BlackIce GTX360 + Swiftech 655 + XSPC ResTop
    Macbook Pro 15" Late 2011 (i7 2760QM + HD 6770M)
    Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) , Huawei Nexus 6P
    [history system]80286 80386 80486 Cyrix K5 Pentium133 Pentium II Duron1G Athlon1G E2180 E3300 E5300 E7200 E8200 E8400 E8500 E8600 Q9550 QX6800 X3-720BE i7-920 i3-530 i5-750 Semp140@x2 955BE X4-B55 Q6600 i5-2500K i7-2600K X4-B60 X6-1055T FX-8120 i7-4790K

  3. #53
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    In 7 days or so we will get a ton of reviews for those that want to see how the card performs in position 2. I find it funny that a bunch of people are complaining about the card running at factory overclock and being tested against the GTX580 at stock. This happens all the time with reviews when vendors release their factory overclock cards and no one complains about that. It's not like the reviewer overclocked it themselves or that AMD compared it to max overclock that may or may not be viable on all cards, they compared it to a card that is factory overclocked. If they had released it without the switch positions and said that 880Mhz was default, then what would every one be saying? I look at it as position two is like a power saving feature, not stock clocks since they are guaranteeing the 880mhz setting. As far as power consumption goes, does anyone that buy these cards care? What about the power consumption of two GTX580's? You do not get this card if you are trying to save the world or you want a lower power bill. This is not, I repeat, this is not a die shrink or new architecture, so power consumption should not surprise anyone. This card is a monster, just like what the GTX590 will be aimed at the high end crowd that could care less about the power requirements.
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  4. #54
    Noob Overclocker
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Kringe in die bos
    Posts
    425
    Quote Originally Posted by PatRaceTin View Post
    AMD Fail
    Great analysis there.
    Zombie Killer Corsair 700D with Quad Rad mod+240 rad mod/Asus Maximus III Formula/i5 750 @ 4Ghz/8GB GSkill Trident/HIS HD 6990/Dell u2711/120GB Kingston SSD Now!/All under EK watercooling goodness!
    HTPC Lian Li V354B/i5 750/4GB Corsair/MSI HD5770/60GB GSkill Phoenix/Corsair H50/EVGA P55 Micro SLi

  5. #55
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    Quote Originally Posted by Gilgamesh View Post
    With 830/1250 - 1536SP for each gpus on HD6990, GTX590 need al least 700/1400/1000 - 512SP to just PAIR performance: little over at 1920 AA, little under at 2560 AA.
    It's technically 880/1250. People just have to flip the BIOS switch. Bet 99% of people are going to do that shortly after installing the card.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  6. #56
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    328
    Quote Originally Posted by ahu View Post
    You're forgetting one thing. If I read correctly from the article, typical game workload is 350W. Powertune limit being so close at 375W, the card is bound to be throttling a lot on shader heavy loads. If I remember correctly, even HD6970 was throttling on 3D Mark Perlin noise test with a TDP limit of 250 W (vs 190 typical).
    I don't forgetting that

    But can you bet on GTX590 beating this power/performance without "throttling" at 350-400W range?

    User can change Power tune setting in CCC: with +20% HD6970 don't throttle even with Furmark/OCCT.

  7. #57
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    3,562
    Dual link requires an ACTIVE DP adaptor while single link can use a passive one. It's a money saving path considering active adaptors cost upwards of $100 each.

  8. #58
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    France - Bx
    Posts
    2,601

  9. #59
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Bulgaria/Plovdiv
    Posts
    263

  10. #60
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Italy
    Posts
    328
    Quote Originally Posted by zalbard View Post
    It's technically 880/1250. People just have to flip the BIOS switch. Bet 99% of people are going to do that shortly after installing the card.
    Agree. If buyers don't care for 375W, why care for 450W

    But Nvidia GTX590 can marginally beat 2x 880/1250 - 1536SP perhaps only over 750Mhz gpus: aggressive hand picking GF110s under 1.0V, and huge thermal throttling

    Just my 2 cent: 1-2 weeks we have all reviews.

  11. #61
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    1,202
    Wow this one sure reaks of fail. I'd rather go for two 6970's than this oversized and uselss hunk of junk.
    2600k @ 5.0Ghz 1.54V, Giga Z68, Zotac GTX680 AMP!, Patriot 1066Mhz 8GB RAM, Custom water, Silverstone 1000W, HAF932

  12. #62
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by QuadDamage View Post
    Wow this one sure reaks of fail. I'd rather go for two 6970's than this oversized and uselss hunk of junk.
    what were you hoping for?
    2500k @ 4900mhz - Asus Maxiums IV Gene Z - Swiftech Apogee LP
    GTX 680 @ +170 (1267mhz) / +300 (3305mhz) - EK 680 FC EN/Acteal
    Swiftech MCR320 Drive @ 1300rpms - 3x GT 1850s @ 1150rpms
    XS Build Log for: My Latest Custom Case

  13. #63
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,984
    Seriously, people can't get enough of complaining about everything lately. Everything's amazing, and nobody's happy?

    Ryzen 9 3900X w/ NH-U14s on MSI X570 Unify
    32 GB Patriot Viper Steel 3733 CL14 (1.51v)
    RX 5700 XT w/ 2x 120mm fan mod (2 GHz)
    Tons of NVMe & SATA SSDs
    LG 27GL850 + Asus MG279Q
    Meshify C white

  14. #64
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    195
    Quote Originally Posted by QuadDamage View Post
    Wow this one sure reaks of fail. I'd rather go for two 6970's than this oversized and uselss hunk of junk.
    Two 6970`s, are gonna draw more power,cost more(probably) or the same and take up more space.So, what gives ?
    Every dual gpu card follows the same path, so if this fails, every dual gpu card fails

  15. #65
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    660
    AMD pron:

    source
    An unfortunate person is one tries to fart but sh1ts instead...

    My Water Cooling Case Build (closed)

  16. #66
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    1,246
    Maybe nvidia will learn to build a decent PCB and power circuit too...

  17. #67
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,125
    Wow that PCB looks very clean

  18. #68
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    399
    Quote Originally Posted by Tha Last Meal View Post
    This is really funny they Compare dual-GPU with single-GPU!!!......lol
    Agreed, they should have compared it to a gTX295... And run DX11 games too...

    Quote Originally Posted by bl4ckdr4g00n View Post
    450W under OC mode
    freaking ridiculous
    67% faster than gtx580 under OC => about 63% faster gtx580 under normal mode.
    I have strong belief that gtx590's gonna bury this premature monster alive


    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    AMD marketing department has become shadier than NV as of late.
    lolwut? It's an embargoed slide you won't see released officialy.

    Observation: The slide is dated december 2010. There have been some improvements since.

  19. #69
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Where the Cheese Heads Reside
    Posts
    2,173
    Wow.... that is one heck of a card that is for sure.

    As for power consumption, really doesn't look like they shaved off to much with the GPU on the dual board vs the single card, I'd say its pretty in line with roughly 175-200W per core. Though really they should be able to use lower voltages on the core to hit those speeds. They should be using the 6950's GPU voltage @ 1.1V if not lower to hit 900Mhz on binned chips. If mine and others can easily take there 6950's to 900Mhz on 1.1V with all the shaders unlocked, surely AMD can find some that can too. Doesn't help tones but hey 15-20W per core can make or break it with lower voltages going from 830 to 900Mhz
    -=The Gamer=-
    MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
    8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
    Sapphire 7950 VaporX 1150/1500 w/ 1.2V/1.5V | 32C Idle / 64C Load | 2x 128Gig Crucial M4 SSD's
    BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
    -=The Server=-
    Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
    3 Gig PC2-6400 | 3x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 2x Samsung F4 2TB
    Heat

  20. #70
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    409
    Looks like half the memory chips are on the backside of the card.
    "No, you'll warrant no villain's exposition from me."

  21. #71
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    668
    If the big problem for Nvidia not doing GTX590 with GTX580 cores was the 300W limit and AMD just came up with a 375W default card I think Nvidia will have no problem putting their 580 cores on a GTX590
    Proud owner of an iPhone3G 16G White




    SpiTweaker by Monteboy,try it

  22. #72
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    I wish they would just give us a limited edition single gpu 375w card. 1 big monster chip to rule them all.

  23. #73
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    414
    Quote Originally Posted by QuadDamage View Post
    Wow this one sure reaks of fail. I'd rather go for two 6970's than this oversized and uselss hunk of junk.
    If you really expected more from this you are clueless my friend. For what this card is its pretty damn good. A lot of these complaining post seem to be more or less people not taking the time to think before they post.
    Anyhow im looking forward to seeing this 590 in action since its clear there is no 300w limit at play with these card.

  24. #74
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    247
    Well, nvidia cards has always been less power efficent than AMDs. Including GTX580 vs HD 6970. So if they want to beat this 6990, they will have to come up with card which consumes 400W at least.
    Last edited by Kristoferr; 03-01-2011 at 01:04 PM.

  25. #75
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Georgia
    Posts
    414
    Quote Originally Posted by DMH View Post
    If the big problem for Nvidia not doing GTX590 with GTX580 cores was the 300W limit and AMD just came up with a 375W default card I think Nvidia will have no problem putting their 580 cores on a GTX590
    What i dont think you are taking in to consideration is the difference in power draw. Guru3d suggests that the 580 at full load draws around 258w while the 6970 draws around 207 fully loaded.

Page 3 of 19 FirstFirst 12345613 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •