Cooler Master HAF 942
Sabertooth X79
Win7 64
3960X @ 4805 1.376 v-core
32GB DDR3 1866 G.SKILL Ripjaws Z
OCZ RevoDrive 3 series RVD3-FHPX4-120G PCI-E 120GB
3 X 6T Raid 0 Hitachi Storage
Themaltake Tough Power 1200
1 HD 7970
F@H badge by xoqolat
Movieman as a 980X fan I must admit that the Sandy Bridge seems a very interesting proposition.
If you later confirm (I am eager to get this info) that at 120-150 Watts consumption your 2600K can run stable over a week with air cooling and say with acceptable core temps (max 70 C) and have an average over seven days of 50k or more then I will bow very low. This means that a 4 core would equal a 6core at nearly half the power consumption and one third of the price. It is just astounding. It will not change my standard platform that will remain until 2012 at least the X58-980X couple.
I hope that these improvements will be integrated in the future generation that will replace the X58-980X platform with octo and decacores.
Nevertheless I would like to see an exact clock per clock performance test on WCG between the 2600K and 980X. Say with both at 4.2 Ghz with air cooling.
Now I can understand the major breakthrough in power consumption, but I do not understand how 4 cores beat 6 cores at clock per clock. This means that the 2600K can process more instructions per clock and or more floating point operations per clock and the improvement ratio would be of 50% which is enormous.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
My guess is that the CPU's running over 1.3v are pulling close to 200W out of the wall socket. I don't trust the Kill-A-Watt to measure power consumption. The only thing I trust is my monthly utility bill to tell me how much electricity is being used.![]()
Audentes fortuna iuvat
"Fortune favors the bold"
MM make sure you have that kill-a-watt set to Watts. I know it sounds remedial but i used mine the other day and was likebut had forgotten it defaults to amps or something like that, not watts
Cruncher #1: EVGA Z68 FTW | i7-2600k @ 4.5 | 6GB Ram
Cruncher #2: Supermicro Dual-Socket | 2 x 6-core Opterons | 4GB Ram
Cruncher #3: 8-core Xserve 1,1
T400 for non-crunching
"But don't think you'll run me over - It's, ah, planting season here in Texas... and the farm is growing..." -Otis11 on crunching WCG
For info the comparative specs by Intel between 980X and 2600K. From that it is impossible to expect such performance level from the 2600K.
![]()
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Audentes fortuna iuvat
"Fortune favors the bold"
My westmeres at only 3.7GHz draw 175W headless, I'd believe 150W for SB without a ridiculous over clock.
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Maybe your little trick worked, Dave. How many here quickly bought a SB after reading about 50k PPD @ 120w?![]()
edit: poop flew out of my mouth.
This new power consumption info has me thinking.. I've not seen hard power numbers for crunching at 5ghz (or the volts needed to get there) but if SB can crunch at 5ghz (or close) at under the watts the other i7's use then it's epicness will be restored in my eyes
Last edited by shoota; 01-13-2011 at 11:50 AM.
Cruncher #1: EVGA Z68 FTW | i7-2600k @ 4.5 | 6GB Ram
Cruncher #2: Supermicro Dual-Socket | 2 x 6-core Opterons | 4GB Ram
Cruncher #3: 8-core Xserve 1,1
T400 for non-crunching
"But don't think you'll run me over - It's, ah, planting season here in Texas... and the farm is growing..." -Otis11 on crunching WCG
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
Hey! i edited that out haha.
I just saw where a 2600k was pulling 200W at load @5.1 ghz and a 930 @ 4.2 was using 230w (http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=264847)
I didn't read thoroughly enough to find vcores used.
Like you say MM a beast of a machine.
Cruncher #1: EVGA Z68 FTW | i7-2600k @ 4.5 | 6GB Ram
Cruncher #2: Supermicro Dual-Socket | 2 x 6-core Opterons | 4GB Ram
Cruncher #3: 8-core Xserve 1,1
T400 for non-crunching
"But don't think you'll run me over - It's, ah, planting season here in Texas... and the farm is growing..." -Otis11 on crunching WCG
I don't believe that 230w figure either. I ran at 4.2 for months and was always between 260-265w.
Main Rig
i7 2600k l Asus P8P67 l 2x2gb Gskill l GTS450 l Venomous X l XClio 680
did you have a video card, and fans and stuff? cuz that 230w figure was only for the board, cpu, and ram. so 260 for a full system might be about right
edit: my killawatt says 242w right now for my i7-950 @ 3.5
Cruncher #1: EVGA Z68 FTW | i7-2600k @ 4.5 | 6GB Ram
Cruncher #2: Supermicro Dual-Socket | 2 x 6-core Opterons | 4GB Ram
Cruncher #3: 8-core Xserve 1,1
T400 for non-crunching
"But don't think you'll run me over - It's, ah, planting season here in Texas... and the farm is growing..." -Otis11 on crunching WCG
Looks like I'll be doing another test this weekend....meter vs Kill a Watt clone. I have to say though I ran a pair of gx2's on a ud5 @ 3.0 (stock volts and cooler) for a total of 721watts (kill a watt)on my corsair tx750 with no problem so I do not expect it to be that far out
![]()
My Biggest Fear Is When I die, My Wife Sells All My Stuff For What I Told Her I Paid For It.79 SB threads and 32 IB Threads across 4 rigs 111 threads Crunching!!
Yup, full system, I was getting about 35k a day from that. So if these produce 45k at 200w, that is pretty damn impressive.
Main Rig
i7 2600k l Asus P8P67 l 2x2gb Gskill l GTS450 l Venomous X l XClio 680
Bookmarks