MMM
Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 53 of 53

Thread: New Phenom X4 975 - AMD CPUZ WR

  1. #51
    Champion
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    438
    Quote Originally Posted by Mad222 View Post
    Types of PCB :-

    1. "T"
    2. "N"
    3. "S" (rarely seen)

    On the one hand, the majority of the PCB is marked as "T" of which the quality varies in general. The “T” ones are getting better & better every day (especially for regular use) for new batches like Rbuass’ 975, Over@locker886s’ 555 (I guess) & my 965. However, the IMC of latest “T” chips dun work the same as b4.

    On the other, early weeks & batches of the "N" ones were great clockers, but they could be easily killed under extreme cooling because of its’ vulnerable IMC. Also note that things changed in the new "N" PCB chips lately though, the IMC has become stronger with diff. CPU pins. If you did follow the 955/555 records of mine & Namegts', you would have known the kind of PCB of our chips!

    Some of us might have noticed that the type of PCB for Intel/AMD chips & even display cards has much to do with tolerance of diff. temp. So if we pay more attention to the details & other characteristics, we’ll able to find good ones whether it's a "T" or "N"!
    Very good explanation
    Waiting to test a "S"...lol

  2. #52
    Champion
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    550
    FYI





    Quote Originally Posted by rbuass View Post
    Very good explanation
    Waiting to test a "S"...lol
    A qualified amateur has been poisoned by LN2 & soon be killed

  3. #53
    Champion
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Hungary
    Posts
    1,189
    Quote Originally Posted by Mad222 View Post
    Types of PCB :-

    1. "T"
    2. "N"
    3. "S" (rarely seen)

    On the one hand, the majority of the PCB is marked as "T" of which the quality varies in general. The “T” ones are getting better & better every day (especially for regular use) for new batches like Rbuass’ 975, Over@locker886s’ 555 (I guess) & my 965. However, the IMC of latest “T” chips dun work the same as b4.

    On the other, early weeks & batches of the "N" ones were great clockers, but they could be easily killed under extreme cooling because of its’ vulnerable IMC. Also note that things changed in the new "N" PCB chips lately though, the IMC has become stronger with diff. CPU pins. If you did follow the 955/555 records of mine & Namegts', you would have known the kind of PCB of our chips!

    Some of us might have noticed that the type of PCB for Intel/AMD chips & even display cards has much to do with tolerance of diff. temp. So if we pay more attention to the details & other characteristics, we’ll able to find good ones whether it's a "T" or "N"!
    Thanks for explanations! I didn't check this, but I will ask from friend! Btw, this chip was very crap for NB speed Wasn't stable above 3,1Ghz ://
    "We are competing, competing to win. And the main motivation is to compete for victory" - Ayrton Senna

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •