http://www.nvidia.com/object/product...x-480m-us.html
352 CUDA cores
Core 425Mhz
Shader 850Mhz
256bit 2400Mhz GDDR5
http://www.nvidia.com/object/product...x-480m-us.html
352 CUDA cores
Core 425Mhz
Shader 850Mhz
256bit 2400Mhz GDDR5
Last edited by mindfury; 05-25-2010 at 08:08 AM.
the world's most power draining notebook GPU
Last edited by -Sweeper_; 05-25-2010 at 08:14 AM.
Wanted: Lots of jokes about how hot it is and how much power it uses, maybe throw in "can it play crysis?" while you're at it, or a pic of a burning laptop. We just can't get enough of it.
Really.
I think for a notebook that card is insane. Xtreme alright!
Last time i've seen info, this "GTX 480M" is suppose to be slightly modified GTS 250 core...
EDIT:
Correction, it was the GTX 280M. My bad.
Intel Core i7 920 4 GHz | 18 GB DDR3 1600 MHz | ASUS Rampage II Gene | GIGABYTE HD7950 3GB WindForce 3X | WD Caviar Black 2TB | Creative Sound Blaster Z | Altec Lansing MX5021 | Corsair HX750 | Lian Li PC-V354
Super silent cooling powered by (((Noiseblocker)))
Those specs don't make sense.
A 352 shader part should have 44 TMUs for 37.4GT/s and not 18.7GT/s (half that). It should also have 1.2 Gflops and not 900 Gflops for 850/1700 clocks.
352 shaders at 425 mhz. GTX 480 is 480 at 700. And it's around 1.35 gigaflops. I actually don't know if it's really 900 gflops, should be lower than that.
Dose the outlet require to be 220v @ 15amps for this portable fermunce? If anyone claims its a LAPtop, they must have a really good flame suit.
I wonder what type of voltage this chip is running?
Motherboard: GigaByte P67UD4 f6 | CPU: Intel 2500k 4.5ghz 1.26v | Memory: GSkill 2x4gb @ 1600mhz 1.34v | PSU: SeaSonic X650 Gold 650W | Video: AMD 6970 Koolance water block 880c/1450mem 1.035v | HDD: WD 640gb cavier black: VelociRaptor 300gb: Intel x-25 g2 80gb | Sound: Asus xonar D1 | OS: W7 64bit
Under 0.82V.
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P.), Juan J. Guerrero
No the motive behind a laptop featuring this GPU is much more sinister than you think. The thought is that anyone stupid enough to buy such a laptop should not be able to reproduce, which is why such a laptop will put out so much heat that anyone who dares to put it on their lap will be sterilized.
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
Hey kids why don't you QUOTE your genius insider about the bad performance this time?
It is really embracing for this forum. People jump on and starts bushing everything that comes nVidia and Intel, before the product hits the marked, and before any real benchmarks or results.
Get a clue before you jump on judging an unreleased product.
► ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
► 2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
► Silver Arrow , push/pull
► 2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
► GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
► CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
+
► EVGA SR-2 , A50
► 2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
► Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
► 3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
► XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
► SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W
But is it faster than 5870M and when can we expect a flag ship laptop with this part, such as the ASUS G73?
If it's faster, I don't care how short my battery life is or how hot it gets!
Last edited by TehVince; 05-25-2010 at 11:14 AM.
__________________________________________________
AMD Phenom II X4 "B50" 3.8GHz/2.6GHz NB/1.46v
ATI Radeon HD4850 700MHz/2500MHz
4GB OCZ Platinum DDR3 1333MHz/5-5-5-15-20 1T/1.90v
MSI 790FX-GD70
Auzentech X-Meridian 7.1 PCI
Cooler Master CM690
Corsair HX850W
Thermalright Ultra 120
Dual Dell 2407WFP 24" LCD's
__________________________________________________
I can't wait, I hope it out performs the ATI offering!
The G73 has a great chassis (no fans underneath, like a Mac!), it would be awesome if we had a choice of GPUs.
Last edited by TehVince; 05-25-2010 at 11:13 AM.
__________________________________________________
AMD Phenom II X4 "B50" 3.8GHz/2.6GHz NB/1.46v
ATI Radeon HD4850 700MHz/2500MHz
4GB OCZ Platinum DDR3 1333MHz/5-5-5-15-20 1T/1.90v
MSI 790FX-GD70
Auzentech X-Meridian 7.1 PCI
Cooler Master CM690
Corsair HX850W
Thermalright Ultra 120
Dual Dell 2407WFP 24" LCD's
__________________________________________________
Am I the only one that noticed that this fits the specifications for the GTX465.
My rig the Kill-Jacker
CPU: AMD Phenom II 1055T 3.82GHz
Mobo: ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme
Game GPU: EVGA GTX580
Secondary GPU 2: EVGA GTX470
Memory: Mushkin DDR3 1600 Ridgeback 8GB
PSU: Silverstone SST-ST1000-P
HDD: WD 250GB Blue 7200RPM
HDD2: WD 1TB Blue 7200RPM
CPU Cooler: TRUE120 Rev. B Pull
Case: Antec 1200
FAH Tracker V2 Project Site
Hmm, if the way they cut the units are the same...
0.7x core clock
~0.75x memory clock
So you get 0.8x (max) perf of a GTX 465, which itself like a GTX 285/275 or so...
GTX260 performance or so?
It will definitely be the fastest mobile GPU, no thanks to the anemic 128-bit memory interface of Juniper (you can't really clock RAM fast on notebooks). But the gap should be less than expected- about 15-20% more performance? For double the TDP...
I'm still seeing HP's Envy 15 (if it didn't have that many problems)/17 as the perfect notebook blend for the majority of gamers (who really game)- definitely enough graphics performance, without the heft or uglyness associated with a gaming notebook. These are just gonna sell way more than any Alienware/Clevo, so nVidia really needs a 20-40W lineup on Fermi soon, and hopefully GF104 is (part) of the answer.
But really, congrats to nVidia on making a 530mm2 chip fit with 100W cooling on a design, and actually selling it! ATI would have a hard time doing that for several reasons.
german notebook e-tailer mysn already offers notebooks with 480m for preorder.
it's about time nvidia streamlines their mobile offerings. they used the same architecture over and over again. i think a castrated fermi with a lower power draw could be a pretty good mobile gpu.
1. Asus P5Q-E / Intel Core 2 Quad Q9550 @~3612 MHz (8,5x425) / 2x2GB OCZ Platinum XTC (PC2-8000U, CL5) / EVGA GeForce GTX 570 / Crucial M4 128GB, WD Caviar Blue 640GB, WD Caviar SE16 320GB, WD Caviar SE 160GB / be quiet! Dark Power Pro P7 550W / Thermaltake Tsunami VA3000BWA / LG L227WT / Teufel Concept E Magnum 5.1 // SysProfile
2. Asus A8N-SLI / AMD Athlon 64 4000+ @~2640 MHz (12x220) / 1024 MB Corsair CMX TwinX 3200C2, 2.5-3-3-6 1T / Club3D GeForce 7800GT @463/1120 MHz / Crucial M4 64GB, Hitachi Deskstar 40GB / be quiet! Blackline P5 470W
Last edited by Sam_oslo; 05-25-2010 at 12:09 PM.
► ASUS P8P67 Deluxe (BIOS 1305)
► 2600K @4.5GHz 1.27v , 1 hour Prime
► Silver Arrow , push/pull
► 2x2GB Crucial 1066MHz CL7 ECC @1600MHz CL9 1.51v
► GTX560 GB OC @910/2400 0.987v
► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 400MB RAMDisk
► CM Storm Scout + Corsair HX 1000W
+
► EVGA SR-2 , A50
► 2 x Xeon X5650 @3.86GHz(203x19) 1.20v
► Megahalem + Silver Arrow , push/pull
► 3x2GB Corsair XMS3 1600 CL7 + 3x4GB G.SKILL Trident 1600 CL7 = 18GB @1624 7-8-7-20 1.65v
► XFX GTX 295 @650/1200/1402
► Crucial C300 v006 64GB OS-disk + F3 1TB + 2GB RAMDisk
► SilverStone Fortress FT01 + Corsair AX 1200W
Bookmarks