MMM
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26

Thread: Open beta release of the GPU3 core.

  1. #1
    Extreme BodyBuilder SnW's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Holland,NH
    Posts
    271

    Open beta release of the GPU3 core.


  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,592
    Nice catch, those are awesome news!!

    What I want to see now is GTX480 numbers, later on in comparison to Ati's offerings.

  3. #3
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Nice catch. I wanted it to work on ATI but not yet.. sigh lol. Maybe I'll give it a shot on my GTX260.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  4. #4
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Plymouth (UK)
    Posts
    5,279
    are you guys using the 256 driver?


    My Biggest Fear Is When I die, My Wife Sells All My Stuff For What I Told Her I Paid For It.
    79 SB threads and 32 IB Threads across 4 rigs 111 threads Crunching!!

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Goldsboro NC
    Posts
    111
    I took two boards of the farm over to the 256 driver and have them running the GPU3 client as well. Have another two boards running the same exact GPU combination with the GPU2 client. In a day or so I will be able to actually see if this gives the 2oo series better #s.

    I want to see the 400 series #s myself.

    Folding For The Future
    EG

  6. #6
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    CT, USA!!!
    Posts
    2,821
    Coming over from GPUgrid running a GTX480 800/1600/2000 I'm gettin 16k PPD with the 257.15 drivers, hope everyone enjoys the numbers I forgot how much did 295's get?
    Attached Images Attached Images
    Last edited by =[PULSAR]=; 05-25-2010 at 02:57 PM.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,116
    good results pulsar. I think early gtx480 reviews predicted 12k-16k PPD. so landing on the upper end is good.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    CT, USA!!!
    Posts
    2,821
    After doing some testing looks like there is no difference between the 197.75 and 257.15 drivers as far as F@H is concerned.

    EDIT: Looks like the 197.75 drivers are about 500 PPD better.
    Last edited by =[PULSAR]=; 05-25-2010 at 05:59 PM.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Chattanooga, TN
    Posts
    372
    Wow, very nice numbers there Pulsar! Wonder how the GTX 470 ranks in terms of PPD on this new client. Have you run into any problems folding on the new client?

    Core i5 2500K @ 4.8GHz 1.31v [L041C123] | Gigabyte P67-UD3P-B3 | Corsair H60 | 4GB G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3-1866 8-9-8-24-1T | Samsung F3 1TB |
    ASUS GTX 670 2GB| PCP&C Silencer 500W | Antec Three Hundred "Blacked Out" | Dell Ultrasharp 23" U2311H IPS 1920x1080



  10. #10
    I am Addicted!
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    1,772
    good to start seeing some #'s, but 12-16k does not seem very good for the cost of these cards, but i have been out of the loop for a while. this isn't even double of what a gtx 275 can do if i recall correctly

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Chattanooga, TN
    Posts
    372
    Quote Originally Posted by INFRNL View Post
    good to start seeing some #'s, but 12-16k does not seem very good for the cost of these cards, but i have been out of the loop for a while. this isn't even double of what a gtx 275 can do if i recall correctly
    During the time I used the 275 for folding, it was crunching anywhere between 7-10k PPD depending on the work unit. 275's can be had for less than $200 nowadays whereas the 480's retail around $500!

    Core i5 2500K @ 4.8GHz 1.31v [L041C123] | Gigabyte P67-UD3P-B3 | Corsair H60 | 4GB G.Skill Ripjaws X DDR3-1866 8-9-8-24-1T | Samsung F3 1TB |
    ASUS GTX 670 2GB| PCP&C Silencer 500W | Antec Three Hundred "Blacked Out" | Dell Ultrasharp 23" U2311H IPS 1920x1080



  12. #12
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    CT, USA!!!
    Posts
    2,821
    Quote Originally Posted by OCX600RR View Post
    Wow, very nice numbers there Pulsar! Wonder how the GTX 470 ranks in terms of PPD on this new client. Have you run into any problems folding on the new client?
    No issues yet every WU I have gotten has completed successfully.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    1,646
    Quote Originally Posted by OCX600RR View Post
    During the time I used the 275 for folding, it was crunching anywhere between 7-10k PPD depending on the work unit. 275's can be had for less than $200 nowadays whereas the 480's retail around $500!
    Not even much of the way in power savings. Whats going on here?

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,592
    Sooo, let's do the math. That estimated 64k PPD for two cards over 2 days if we follow Pulsars example (thanks for posting that btw! ). If numbers I've seen are correct, then GTX480 SLI with an oc'd i7 uses around 800W fully loaded. i7 oc'd to 4.2GHz or more will eat ~300W I guess and does 61k+ PPD on bigadv every two days. So if I add two of these cards to a already running system, I roughly add 500W of power usage for 64k PPD. Then again if I just build another i7 and let it fold on bigadv I add 300W to my overall power consumption for roughly the same output.

    Edit: Okay, it seems I need to change the numbers a bit. Found several sources saying that an oc'd i7 is eating more like 350-400W. Sooo, it kinda levels the competition between both a bit. For 100-150W higher power usage over an additional i7 you get 4k PPD more and the possibility of playing games as well with the cards.
    Last edited by p2501; 05-26-2010 at 12:49 AM.

  15. #15
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    CT, USA!!!
    Posts
    2,821
    Well just so happens I also have a killawatt hooked up to my system i7 @ 4ghz and GTX480 @ 800/1600/2000 pulls an even 500W at full load.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,592
    Wow, okay. That is 90W less than my 4.2GHz system when I still had a 295 running.

    Anyone with a kill-a-watt running 480 SLI?


    Edit: Btw, wasn't GPU3 supposed to be available for GNU/Linux?

    Edit 2: I put my Kill-a-Watt in line again and my two i7 (one watercooled 4.2GHz 920 12GB, one air cooled 3,8GHz 860 6GB and one GBit switch) are using 650W. Both are running same volts (had bad luck with my 860) so if I overlook differences in cooling and memory both are drawing 325W. If an SLI system draws 800W we're looking at roughly 500W from the cards, as expected. So a 500W 480 SLI upgrade sort of equals a complete i7 setup in production over 2 days while drawing well over 100W more...
    Last edited by p2501; 05-26-2010 at 05:14 AM.

  17. #17
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    1,169
    It's about time they released a new core. Good to see they are still actively developing over there...

    "[crunching is] a minor service to humanity as a side effect of our collective hardware fetish" - Blauhung

  18. #18
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    CT, USA!!!
    Posts
    2,821
    I think I'm already out of work units, back to gpugrid for now.

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    53
    I can't really express how disappointed I am that stanford doesn't want science out of my 5870. I think gpu reviews all need to start putting folding@home performance on their first pages to spur amd and nvidia into taking matters into their own hands and developing folding@home cores for their own cards.

  20. #20
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    Quote Originally Posted by theystolemyname View Post
    I can't really express how disappointed I am that stanford doesn't want science out of my 5870. I think gpu reviews all need to start putting folding@home performance on their first pages to spur amd and nvidia into taking matters into their own hands and developing folding@home cores for their own cards.
    The ATI part is coming, just the nvidia part of GPU3 was ready for public beta first.

    I'm looking forward to ATI GPU3, I'm hoping that it'll improve performance on my 4870. I feel like it is underutilized.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  21. #21
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Bloomfield
    Posts
    1,968
    Quote Originally Posted by theystolemyname View Post
    I can't really express how disappointed I am that stanford doesn't want science out of my 5870. I think gpu reviews all need to start putting folding@home performance on their first pages to spur amd and nvidia into taking matters into their own hands and developing folding@home cores for their own cards.
    you have been misinformed. stanford has been working with ATi for years. one of the main reasons for gpu3 is so nv and ati gpu's can run the same projects, thus speeding up the science.

    they are working with ATi but their opencl compiler is buggy and immature. nvidia's opencl compiler is no better but they have cuda. see how long gpugrid has been waiting for in the 5870 thread. there is nothing anyone outside of AMD that can help.

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    CO, USA
    Posts
    112
    My EVGA GTX 470 sure does emit a high pitched noise while folding. Anyone else have that problem? I'm using the 255 driver.
    MSI X370 XPOWER GAMING TITANIUM / AMD Ryzen 7 1800x

    Fold it until it breaks
    ASUS Rampage IV Extreme / Intel 3820

    RIP Abit

  23. #23
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    'burb of Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,871
    Quote Originally Posted by Sparky View Post
    The ATI part is coming, just the nvidia part of GPU3 was ready for public beta first.

    I'm looking forward to ATI GPU3, I'm hoping that it'll improve performance on my 4870. I feel like it is underutilized.
    Me coming back to folding is a long time coming, but it won't happen until I get water on my Phenom II X6, seeing as I'm idling at 43c...

    This processor is under-utilized unless I'm actually doing something like gaming or solid model rendering.

  24. #24
    Xtremely High Voltage Sparky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Ohio, USA
    Posts
    16,040
    What heatsink are you using? 43C just sounds...wrong.
    The Cardboard Master
    Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
    Intel Core i7 2600k @ 4.5GHz, 16GB DDR3-1600, Radeon 7950 @ 1000/1250, Win 10 Pro x64

  25. #25
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    'burb of Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    2,871
    Xigmatek HDT-S1283. I'm about to dump watercooling for a CPU-only loop on my credit card... even the gf is talking me into it. I'd love to get my GTX260 under water too, but I don't know what to do about the RAM and whatnot, and Swiftech doesn't make that unisink, I'm not buying a full cover, and I don't have enough radiator (2x120mm and 1x120mm).

    Got any WC stuff you want to sell for free?

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •