MMM
Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast
Results 76 to 100 of 191

Thread: AMD phenom II X6 hexacore vs Intel i7 quad HT

  1. #76
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    280
    yep, this is what i get...

    #----cut here----
    # Chip drivers
    # no driver for AMD K10 thermal sensors yet
    #----cut here----

  2. #77
    Xtreme crazy bastid
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On mah murder-sickle!
    Posts
    5,878
    Says it all, really. Gotta wait for the update OR go get the latest source and roll your own

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  3. #78
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    280
    Wish I knew how...

  4. #79
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,264
    It will defineatly be reporting frequency wrong if the reading is under load. The chip would never allow 3.6Ghz on all cores loaded at stock.

    What does do though is essentially sit in Turbo mode whenever it's completely idle or less than 50% CPU usage(load distributed across any cores). when load goes above that it'll be at 3.2.
    I
    -edit , my mistake, it does only boost active cores!
    Last edited by mAJORD; 05-01-2010 at 04:03 PM.

  5. #80
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    280
    It was definitely under load when I checked. When I enabled CnQ everything went to 3.2 though.

  6. #81
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,264
    just edited my post, it does only boost the 3 cores.

    CnQ is a bit screwy at the moment, I haven't seen anyone be able to disable it fully, I think the HW turbo mode overrides

  7. #82
    Xtreme crazy bastid
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On mah murder-sickle!
    Posts
    5,878
    It might use CnQ to regulate itself to 3.2, running up to 3.6 with the controls disabled. I really don't know, but it wouldn't surprise me.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  8. #83
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    280
    In the BIOS screen when I was Re-enabling CnQ it mentioned that in processors which support turbo mode CnQ should be set to disabled. I had it disabled though and got an error message on boot-up in Ubuntu saying it would be unable to scale the frequency properly. I actually set CnQ to "auto" instead of enabled or disabled. No freq. scaling error message and it runs at 3.2 under load. When I go to overclock it all this will be moot anyway, but until LM-sensors works I'm going to refrain. It ran 24 hours at 3.6 to the best of my knowledge and it didn't seem to be running very hot, but without the sensor working properly there is no real way to tell yet. Not one available to me, anyway.

  9. #84
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,264
    mm I need to get AMD Overdrive to work with my mobo so I can check it out. No other freq reporting tool reports what's going on properly.

    But I think that all totally idle cores will always drop into a lower P state / frequency even with CnQ off. Perhaps Turning it OFF just prevents the legacy operation of CNQ from occuring..

  10. #85
    Xtreme crazy bastid
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On mah murder-sickle!
    Posts
    5,878
    Try this:

    enter "sudo modprobe k10temp" (then your password of course)

    then "sensors" and see what it says.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  11. #86
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    280
    Gave it a shot D_A this is what returned

    Code:
    $ sudo modprobe k10temp
    [sudo] password for XXXXXX: 
    FATAL: Module k10temp not found.

  12. #87
    Xtreme crazy bastid
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On mah murder-sickle!
    Posts
    5,878
    What kernel version are you running?

    (type "uname -r" in the terminal)

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  13. #88
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    280
    2.6.31-21-generic
    Code:
    $ uname -r
    2.6.31-21-generic

  14. #89
    Xtreme crazy bastid
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On mah murder-sickle!
    Posts
    5,878
    The K10temp module is listed as being included in the 2.6.33 kernel series .... how much do you want it?

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  15. #90
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    280
    A bit, but as I don't plan on bringing this computer down until supercomputer week is over I can wait a week. Ive found a few websites with instructions on adding k10temp manually, but I'm afraid I have run out of time to do it right now. Later tonight I will be back to mess it up

  16. #91
    Xtreme crazy bastid
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On mah murder-sickle!
    Posts
    5,878
    Honestly I think you're better off just compiling the kernel from source. I can help you with that, it's actually not that hard (when you have a script to work from )
    Wait till after the challenge, though, so you have time to tinker with the MANY new settings you'll discover.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  17. #92
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    280
    Sounds good, I look forward to it.

  18. #93
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Land o' 10,000 lakes
    Posts
    836
    Just a reminder, when compiling the kernel, don't forget to build in support for your file system, network, and SATA. I've done it before, and it is not fun to debug when you're totally new to it
    Just take your time in menuconfig. I love compiling my own kernel now. Compiling gnome or KDE on the other hand...

    I'm almost always available on Steam to chat. Same username.

  19. #94
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    So I am up and running on my WHS server with a 1055T, however I have one quick question, when I go and stream from the server what happens? Does WCG suspend, share or other?
    Thanks.
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  20. #95
    Fanboy of Good Products
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    FL
    Posts
    4,050
    usually it suspends until your cpu is freed back up. i can leave boinc crunching, start a game and never miss a frame.. i hope that's what you're asking
    Cruncher #1: EVGA Z68 FTW | i7-2600k @ 4.5 | 6GB Ram
    Cruncher #2: Supermicro Dual-Socket | 2 x 6-core Opterons | 4GB Ram
    Cruncher #3: 8-core Xserve 1,1

    T400 for non-crunching



    "But don't think you'll run me over - It's, ah, planting season here in Texas... and the farm is growing..." -Otis11 on crunching WCG

  21. #96
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Dallas
    Posts
    4,467
    Yep. Just want to make sure it doesn't mess with my streaming. Thanks.
    CPUID http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=484051
    http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=554982
    New DO Stepping http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=555012
    4.8Ghz - http://valid.canardpc.com/show_oc.php?id=794165

    Desk Build
    FX8120 @ 4.6Ghz 24/7 / Asus Crosshair V /HD7970/ 8Gb (4x2Gb) Gskill 2133Mhz / Intel 320 160Gb OS Drive, WD 256GB Game Storage

    W/C System
    (CPU) Swiftech HD (GPU) EK HD7970 with backplate (RAM) MIPS Ram block (Rad/Pump) 3 x Thermochill 120.3 triple rads and Dual MCP355's with Heatkiller dual top and Cyberdruid Prism res / B*P/Koolance Compression Fittings and Quick Disconnects.

  22. #97
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    In a van down by the river
    Posts
    852
    Quote Originally Posted by sierra_bound View Post
    Do you recall the numbers you got from the BOINC benchmark? The benchmark runs automatically when you first install BOINC.
    Hello, Just got home, checked stats after a little over 26 hrs running, results upload 1 hour ago and shows average points per calander day as 1,266.83 but probably because I joined 3 days before actually running. Points generated shows 7,601 but did not start running till 27hrs ago. Team History and stats updated 5 hour ago so does that make it 22 hours? 345.5 points per hour?

    Edit: My Up Time now shows 1:04.43.33

    Don't remember benchmark, sorry. Wanted to get some idea of performance before activating other machines.
    Found it, Thanks soya! 3275Whetstone/8011 Dhrystone for stock speed, volts, cooler +2600NB
    Last edited by PaganII; 05-01-2010 at 11:07 PM. Reason: time correction/ add benchmark

  23. #98
    Xtreme crazy bastid
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    On mah murder-sickle!
    Posts
    5,878
    Quote Originally Posted by jspace View Post
    Just a reminder, when compiling the kernel, don't forget to build in support for your file system, network, and SATA. I've done it before, and it is not fun to debug when you're totally new to it
    Just take your time in menuconfig. I love compiling my own kernel now. Compiling gnome or KDE on the other hand...
    My intention was/is to nurse folk through the process the first time and just build a new kernel with everything the same as the original generic kernel. That way everything should work straight away, but they get the additional modules that come with the new kernel version.
    For my own kernels, I strip them worse than an open cut mine. I even cut multicore support down to only and exactly the number of cores in the precise rig the kernel is for, just to save a little bit more memory.

    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  24. #99
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    118
    Well, thats the Bench at 4GHz. I do know that it's quite much voltage, but it isn't stable at all beyond 3,6GHz.

    W7 64 Bit

  25. #100
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    1,264
    For some reason I'm getting better results with less Mhz

    1055T @ 3.92Ghz NB @ 2800 RAM 1120 CAS 7

    3246 FP (whetstone)
    10344 INT (Dhrystone)

    so at 4 I'd expect a couple % higher even.. Sensitive to NB/L3 cache ??

Page 4 of 8 FirstFirst 1234567 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •