MMM
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 69

Thread: PCMARK05 testing

  1. #1
    PIfection
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    989

    PCMARK05 testing

    so the coach finally put me in the game first time for the season, SNAPPED off my warm up pants, got the sweat bands ready to go,

    GIGA X58-UD4P
    GSKILL PS 17066 C8
    GSKILL Falcon SSDs
    ADAPTEC 5805 raid controller
    1 GIGA iram
    SAPPHIRE 4890





    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?pcm05=2152753

  2. #2
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    u' so throwed dude
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  3. #3
    PIfection
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    989
    she thinks your SOOOOO throwed man

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Arizona - USA
    Posts
    2,200
    Damm nice SSD tweaking!
    //RETIRED-o00o--°(_)°--o00o-OVERCLOCKER//


  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    1,609
    what did you do to your "web page rendering" score, crazy pages/sec?!?! very nice

  6. #6
    PIfection
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    989
    thanks mate, just using a different browser for webpages/sec

  7. #7
    Diablo 3! Who's Excited?
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boulder, Colorado
    Posts
    9,412
    Nice testing This december I'll finally devote some time to this benchie. I've wondered about forcing a faster web browser for that test, you confirmed my suspicions Looking forward to the complete run.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    1,609
    Ah nice you found a better one than I did I gave that tip to dinos ages ago too

  9. #9
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    you did? i guess i dont really remember cause i dont enjoy this bench hahahah
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  10. #10
    take me to the manbar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    South Africa :)
    Posts
    1,179
    welldone pro! you are the best ! (nacho libre voice)

  11. #11
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    1,609
    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22 View Post
    you did? i guess i dont really remember cause i dont enjoy this bench hahahah
    Yeah was in PM when you were having crap results with 5x iram.

  12. #12
    PIfection
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    989
    thanks karmakazi, you and chispy have always been very good at pcmark

  13. #13
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Video encoding is HUGE.....How come?.....

    P.S. Is it "legal" to "manipulate" the "default" benchmark?.....
    I mean, this thing about the PCMark and CHANGING the DEFAULT browser of it with ANOTHER one, is it "within the default settings" of the benchmark?...
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  14. #14
    silver wall jumper X
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,579
    Cool score.

    Futuremark has actually not implented the browser in the benchmark - PCmark05 is only looking for Internet Explorer and starting it. The have seen this loophole and closed it in PCMark Vantage - which comes with it's own browser included.

  15. #15
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Ahhh.......I see........thanks...
    So the only think someone has to do, is to uninstall the IE and install another browser right?......
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  16. #16
    silver wall jumper X
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,579
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5 View Post
    Ahhh.......I see........thanks...
    So the only think someone has to do, is to uninstall the IE and install another browser right?......
    Yeah and rename it iexplorer.exe. Same goes for media encoder. Find a better encoder, maybe a multi threaded one and let it do the crunching.

  17. #17
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    Is it only possible to tune at the level of application or also at the level of the file?
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  18. #18
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Please guys, speak ENGLISH.......It's only Greek to me....
    Explain I mean with simple words......
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    1,692
    Wow PCMark is such a lovely benchmark, maaaan I'd love knowing how to tweak it that much
    Grats pro

  20. #20
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5 View Post
    Please guys, speak ENGLISH.......It's only Greek to me....
    Explain I mean with simple words......
    Changing browser/decoder => tuning application used
    Changing file to decode => tuning, ehr, file.

    The first seems to be no problem, but I don't know about the second.
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  21. #21
    silver wall jumper X
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    1,579
    Quote Originally Posted by massman View Post
    Changing browser/decoder => tuning application used
    Changing file to decode => tuning, ehr, file.

    The first seems to be no problem, but I don't know about the second.
    For browser test; changing the temporay html file wouldn't really do much. Disabling showing images in your browser settings helps a tiny bit - but something like that I feel that's a bit of an optimzation...

    I had attempted to mess with the other temp files ( general usage , etc etc.) but never accomplished anything. Don't recall trying to mess with the encoding - but honestly doubt it. If I recall correctly they are actually encrypted. But been too long ago that I looked at those files.

    I like your thinking!

  22. #22
    PIfection
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    989
    they are some sort of archive file, if you do a check with a hex editor you can see all sorts of contents, webpages, images, etc... i have no been able to uncompress them to examine the content properly...

    browser test, yeah different browser definatly does help, and browser optimization also helps...

    using a different video encoder and playing with the encoding settings definatly scales this one up aswell..

    and for the hdd tests you need three arrays and dynamically switch between them during the benchmark, each hdd test wants different optimization, so you need to treat them all seperately... one array for all three will almost certainly leave you missing something...

  23. #23
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Buffalo, NY
    Posts
    1,609
    Quote Originally Posted by youngpro View Post
    thanks karmakazi, you and chispy have always been very good at pcmark
    Thanks for the kind words

    When you throw a 5870 in there... my god... 34.5k easily... and then max out xp startup it will be
    Last edited by TheKarmakazi; 12-03-2009 at 05:01 PM.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    Wichita, Ks
    Posts
    3,887
    with all of these 'optimizations' is that score even submittable on the hwbot? i kinda think this is going against the spirit of the benchmark. a benchmark is so that you can compare your system to other peoples, but if you alter the benchmark ITSELF, isnt that cheating?
    "Lurking" Since 1977


    Jesus Saves, God Backs-Up
    *I come to the news section to ban people, not read complaints.*-[XC]Gomeler
    Don't believe Squish, his hardware does control him!

  25. #25
    PIfection
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    989
    i disagree with that, tweaks and optimization is what makes the difference.. i think if your willing to put in the time and effort to understand a benchmark you shouldnt be penalized for that....

    i mean if clocks was all we were after, we could use cpuz and gpuz validations, but that wouldnt be much fun at all

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •