MMM
Page 1 of 9 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 213

Thread: Nvidia crushes MSI's Lucid - RETRACTED

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    197

    Nvidia crushes MSI's Lucid - RETRACTED

    ...

    So, what do we have in the end? Three weeks before the launch of the Lucid based Big Bang Fuzion, the product was killed, and it was 'replaced' with a non-existent Trinergy board. Well, Trinergy exists as photoshopped pixels, and likely a powerpoint or three, but nothing more. The Trinergy is a pale shadow of the Fuzion, and the Nforce 200 is an awful PCIe switch with none of the extras that Lucid brings to the table.

    Weeks before, Nvidia told many people that it would not let the Lucid solution live, and on launch day, the Fuzion was killed. Well, technically, it is still alive, but being pushed to Q1 for absolutely no technical reasons is a typical knifing move. How the game works is that a board gets delayed and delayed, and when all eyes are off it, it disappears. If anyone bothers to ask, they get a lame excuse about market conditions or some technical nit that no one can explain. It can't be officially killed on 'launch' day, or else things look bad, but later on usually means no one cares.

    What you are seeing is a classic behind the scenes coverup. Lucid has a very interesting product that Nvidia doesn't like, because it threatens Nvidia's noxious SLI tax. The only real question now is whether MSI had its arms twisted or its pockets lined to kill off Lucid based products. Whatever the case, the user loses, and Nvidia unfairly profits. It might have gone unnoticed if it wasn't such an obvious hack job and carried out so badly. And if that isn't a hallmark of Nvidia these days, I don't know what is. S|A
    Full story & explanation

  2. #2
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    9,060
    If this is really true then burn in hell, Nvidia.
    Donate to XS forums
    Quote Originally Posted by jayhall0315 View Post
    If you are really extreme, you never let informed facts or the scientific method hold you back from your journey to the wrong answer.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    1,023
    did nvidia kill off it's PR department or something?

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Acreageville, Alberta
    Posts
    1,411
    Nv need a hard dose of reality, and at this rate they are going to get it.

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    The Curragh.
    Posts
    1,294
    I want to see more sources saying the same before I believe it.

    But if true, I will never touch another NV product again.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Green Bay, WI
    Posts
    616
    Wow, what a load of horse. Fermi better be the second coming of the 8800 series perf jump or i'm out.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,095
    Son of a .....

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Linköping
    Posts
    2,034
    Way to go

    EDIT: This is written by Charlie Demerjian and I am not alone to take him serious? XS got the swineflu!
    Last edited by Smartidiot89; 11-04-2009 at 12:05 PM.
    SweClockers.com

    CPU: Phenom II X4 955BE
    Clock: 4200MHz 1.4375v
    Memory: Dominator GT 2x2GB 1600MHz 6-6-6-20 1.65v
    Motherboard: ASUS Crosshair IV Formula
    GPU: HD 5770

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Posts
    510
    and this is surprising???

  10. #10
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    The one that was 'launched', and we use the word launch very carefully, was not the promised Lucid board, but one based on, wait for it, the Nvidia Nforce 200 PCIe decelerator chip.
    I just can't stop laughing.
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by N19h7m4r3 View Post
    I want to see more sources saying the same before I believe it.

    But if true, I will never touch another NV product again.
    Add MSI to that list too.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    Well, we will see if it really is the case. Nevertheless, it wouldn't surprise me.

    Quote Originally Posted by freeloader View Post
    Add MSI to that list too.
    Just theoratically, what do you think would any manufacturer do if a supplier threatens them to not deliver the goods they need to be competitive if you don't scrap a certain product? And I believe if NVIDIA made MSI scrap their lucid-board it was because of something like that.
    Last edited by FischOderAal; 11-04-2009 at 12:07 PM.
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    above USA...below USSR
    Posts
    1,186
    no way, i wanted to get a mobo with lucid for my AM3 platform...say it a'nt so
    Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
    MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
    Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
    Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
    CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
    RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
    Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
    300Gb of MUSICA!!


    Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
    http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,692
    I find this completely based on speculation to the highest degree. There is not even a hint of solid evidence that nVidia has got anything to do with this.

    Intel Core i7-3770K
    ASUS P8Z77-I DELUXE
    EVGA GTX 970 SC
    Corsair 16GB (2x8GB) Vengeance LP 1600
    Corsair H80
    120GB Samsung 840 EVO, 500GB WD Scorpio Blue, 1TB Samsung Spinpoint F3
    Corsair RM650
    Cooler Master Elite 120 Advanced
    OC: 5Ghz | +0.185 offset : 1.352v

  15. #15
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    681
    Desperate times call for desperate measures. But these are the wrong measures, I think. They should be promoting their brand instead of making their customers hate them, so they can get a good price for their company when they get bought out.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, UK
    Posts
    473
    If its true, and it stinks of NV style: you nvidia, and fermi, im out, im not waiting. I have been but not anymore. Just die, I dont care about compition, you sicken me. ing die and take IW with you

    Edit: sorry about the swearing, lost it for a min there, fed up of NV in general and having to wait for them. Once again sorry
    Last edited by Bodkin; 11-04-2009 at 12:13 PM. Reason: Apologising
    CPU: Intel 2500k (4.8ghz)
    Mobo: Asus P8P67 PRO
    GPU: HIS 6950 flashed to Asus 6970 (1000/1400) under water
    Sound: Corsair SP2500 with X-Fi
    Storage: Intel X-25M g2 160GB + 1x1TB f1
    Case: Sivlerstone Raven RV02
    PSU: Corsair HX850
    Cooling: Custom loop: EK Supreme HF, EK 6970
    Screens: BenQ XL2410T 120hz


    Help for Heroes

  17. #17
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    427
    Lucid Hydra is an Intel financed project and gets great support from Intel.
    No one can kill Lucid unless it is not ready yet.
    Lucid should be more careful about announcing great Big Bang products they cannot deliver.
    They lose credibility this way.
    Big bang - count down from MSI - Lucid hydra and poof - soap bubbles once again.

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    197
    I don't know... just thinking in the possibility that if hydra is a success, nvidia nf200 and the Sli cookie are gone for ever, so.. 1 source of income less.

    On the other hand i don't think killing 1 motherboard is gonna stop lucid. They sure are pushing with all their might if their product deserves the attention, and more importantly delivers.

    So... all in all i don't understand what nvidia is aiming for with this...

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Ontario
    Posts
    307
    Quote Originally Posted by Tim View Post
    I find this completely based on speculation to the highest degree. There is not even a hint of solid evidence that nVidia has got anything to do with this.
    Because Nvidia have been a shining pillar in the community recently? Disabling Phys-X when paired with an ATI card. Having code in Batman: AA that disables AA on ATI brand cards. Now possibly this? Shame on them.


    Like others have said, they need a real, hard dose of reality.

  20. #20
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lancaster, UK
    Posts
    473
    @Stanley Pain

    Yep, even if it is untrue, NV have been treating us so badly and there PR has an unbeliveble attitude problem. When I can pick up an ASUS 5870 I will, my first ATI card since the 9800
    CPU: Intel 2500k (4.8ghz)
    Mobo: Asus P8P67 PRO
    GPU: HIS 6950 flashed to Asus 6970 (1000/1400) under water
    Sound: Corsair SP2500 with X-Fi
    Storage: Intel X-25M g2 160GB + 1x1TB f1
    Case: Sivlerstone Raven RV02
    PSU: Corsair HX850
    Cooling: Custom loop: EK Supreme HF, EK 6970
    Screens: BenQ XL2410T 120hz


    Help for Heroes

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Chicago,Illinois
    Posts
    1,182
    Quote Originally Posted by Bodkin View Post
    it stinks of NV style: you nvidia,Just die, I dont care,you sicken me. ing die and take IW with you



  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by FischOderAal View Post
    Well, we will see if it really is the case. Nevertheless, it wouldn't surprise me.



    Just theoratically, what do you think would any manufacturer do if a supplier threatens them to not deliver the goods they need to be competitive if you don't scrap a certain product? And I believe if NVIDIA made MSI scrap their lucid-board it was because of something like that.
    Simple, go with their competitors products. That's the problem with any semiconductor company, they have no balls.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    337
    Bastards!

    If true, let the witch hunt begin.
    System: Core I7 920 @ 4200MHz 1.45vCORE 1.35VTT 1.2vIOH // EVGA x58 Classified E760 // 6GB Dominator GT 1866 @ 1688 6-7-6-18 1T 1.65V // Intel X25 80GB // PCP&C 750W Silencer
    Cooling: Heatkiller 3.0 LT CPU block // 655 Pump // GTX360 Radiator
    Sound: X-FI Titanium HD --> Marantz 2265 --> JBL 4311WXA's
    Display: GTX480 // Sony GDM-FW900

  24. #24
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,782
    Quote Originally Posted by Stanley Pain View Post
    Because Nvidia have been a shining pillar in the community recently? Disabling Phys-X when paired with an ATI card. Having code in Batman: AA that disables AA on ATI brand cards. Now possibly this? Shame on them.


    Like others have said, they need a real, hard dose of reality.
    And that hard dose is in everyones pants! Our wallets!

  25. #25
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    I never hear about them much on here, but I really like MSI video cards. I think I just made my next choice ATI based MSI card. I would love to see MSI go straight ATI For a while and still release that board.
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

Page 1 of 9 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •