MMM
Page 2 of 27 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 651

Thread: Corsair revisits CPU cooling: introducing the Hydro Series H50

  1. #26
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    from another thread (i hope he dosnt mind me stealing his photos)





    so things are looking very good. but i cannot tell what speeds they are running at, or how much noise output there is. but overall, hats off to corsair again.

  2. #27
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Athens ~ Greece
    Posts
    119
    Well, assuming both setups are with the stock solution fans, Corsair is @1700rpm (resource page), and TR @1600 (per 1366 RT)...so noise would be somewhat comparable (although the TR solution has one more fan, the stock Lian li goes @1000 on this case).

    I wonder though why did they put the TRUE fan in a pull setup. I believe temps would be worse that way (I have this case)...
    Last edited by Dante80; 06-02-2009 at 11:29 AM.

  3. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    57
    This does look pretty interesting and the price looks very good

  4. #29
    Corsair Rep
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    222
    Quote Originally Posted by Dante80 View Post
    Well, assuming both setups are with the stock solution fans, Corsair is @1700rpm (resource page), and TR @1600 (per 1366 RT)...so noise would be somewhat comparable (although the TR solution has one more fan, the stock Lian li goes @1000 on this case).
    From an audible standpoint, in the lab, I could not tell a significant noise difference between both cases at full CPU load.

  5. #30
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Athens ~ Greece
    Posts
    119
    Yep, that was my guess too. thanks for clarifying...

  6. #31
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    i really cant wait to see some reviews on this thing. price/perf looks like it can set the bar.

  7. #32
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Porto, Portugal
    Posts
    265
    Quote Originally Posted by Redbeard View Post
    From an audible standpoint, in the lab, I could not tell a significant noise difference between both cases at full CPU load.
    Can i apply a 360 radiator instead of the 120 radiator that comes with this WC setup?!
    Last edited by JohnMike; 06-02-2009 at 11:44 AM.

    Windows 7 Ultimate 64bit, SP1 Power By:
    Asus Rampage IV Formula
    Intel SBE 3930K
    Gskill RipJaws Z 14900 (1866 DDR3) 16GB 10-11-10-24
    EVGA 570 GTX SLI
    SSD Samsung P830 240GB
    Corsair AX850

  8. #33
    Corsair Rep
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    222
    Quote Originally Posted by JohnMike View Post
    Can i applie a 360 radiator instead of the 120 radiator that comes with this WC setup?!
    You could but you would void the warranty, and I'm not sure how much performance increase you'd get. The pump is very small and designed for low flow through the system, it's nearly inaudible as well. The only significant performance modification we were able to do in the lab was to replace the included radiator (120mm aluminum) with a slightly better radiator (120mm copper) and we got a small performance bump, but a huge cost bump.

    This product is balanced very carefully to work as a completely closed system requiring no maintenance and it has virtually zero evaporation due to the low-evap tubing used.

    It's really designed to be a standalone CPU cooler.

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    1,319
    We need more info before really judging it. We need internal pics of the block, pump specs, and rad info. I'll bet it will have around a 10C air in/water out delta (with those fans) on an i7 and the block is probably pretty high flow, possibly comparable to the Apogee GT or OCZ block. If this pure speculation is true it won't compare to what we do in the WCing section, but it will be "average" WCing performance. Better than air, but worse than building your own loop. Of course, the price for this is less than WCing but more than air. I would say this will probably turn out to be a good product for those wanting better than air performance, but aren't ready just yet to jump into WCing.

    EDIT:
    Quote Originally Posted by Redbeard View Post
    You could but you would void the warranty, and I'm not sure how much performance increase you'd get. The pump is very small and designed for low flow through the system, it's nearly inaudible as well. The only significant performance modification we were able to do in the lab was to replace the included radiator (120mm aluminum) with a slightly better radiator (120mm copper) and we got a small performance bump, but a huge cost bump.
    Those don't sound good. I assume you have also done something to prevent corrosion (alu block maybe).
    Last edited by faster3200; 06-02-2009 at 11:48 AM.

  10. #35
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    752
    how long would it last w/o having to be refilled?

    this looks like a good alternative to an SFF case if it really works like is claimed on the i7

  11. #36
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    how well it will handle a small air bubble?

  12. #37
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    852
    Quote Originally Posted by Cooper View Post
    This is great kit for Silverstone SG05 or any other big enough mITX cases
    EXACTLY what I was thinking. I might have to buy it if the cpu block + tubing is no great than 82mm. Easy to mount in the front of the case. It'd be awesome.

  13. #38
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    226
    But since it's water it will eventually still evaporate. Any idea how long that will take (especially when it reaches high temps on a normal basis)?
    MSI P67 GD65 B3
    2500k 4.8
    GTX480 835/1650/2000
    8gb ram
    Win7

  14. #39
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,095
    Quote Originally Posted by faster3200 View Post
    We need more info before really judging it. We need internal pics of the block, pump specs, and rad info. I'll bet it will have around a 10C air in/water out delta (with those fans) on an i7 and the block is probably pretty high flow, possibly comparable to the Apogee GT or OCZ block. If this pure speculation is true it won't compare to what we do in the WCing section, but it will be "average" WCing performance. Better than air, but worse than building your own loop. Of course, the price for this is less than WCing but more than air. I would say this will probably turn out to be a good product for those wanting better than air performance, but aren't ready just yet to jump into WCing.

    EDIT:
    Those don't sound good. I assume you have also done something to prevent corrosion (alu block maybe).
    Or the exchange fluid has significant amounts of anti-corrosion fluids.
    E7200 @ 3.4 ; 7870 GHz 2 GB
    Intel's atom is a terrible chip.

  15. #40
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    226
    Quote Originally Posted by faster3200 View Post
    We need more info before really judging it. We need internal pics of the block, pump specs, and rad info. I'll bet it will have around a 10C air in/water out delta (with those fans) on an i7 and the block is probably pretty high flow, possibly comparable to the Apogee GT or OCZ block. If this pure speculation is true it won't compare to what we do in the WCing section, but it will be "average" WCing performance. Better than air, but worse than building your own loop. Of course, the price for this is less than WCing but more than air. I would say this will probably turn out to be a good product for those wanting better than air performance, but aren't ready just yet to jump into WCing.

    EDIT:
    Those don't sound good. I assume you have also done something to prevent corrosion (alu block maybe).
    http://www.hardocp.com/news.html?new...VzaWFzdCwsLDE=

    It would be cool if corsair made something like this for video cards as well.
    MSI P67 GD65 B3
    2500k 4.8
    GTX480 835/1650/2000
    8gb ram
    Win7

  16. #41
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    1,319
    Quote Originally Posted by cegras View Post
    Or the exchange fluid has significant amounts of anti-corrosion fluids.
    Which would hurt performance and will eventually run out but, yeah, this is most likely what they did based on pics (the bottom looks like copper). I guess the fluid will evaporate eventually anyway.

    Quote Originally Posted by nsegative View Post
    http://www.hardocp.com/news.html?new...VzaWFzdCwsLDE=

    It would be cool if corsair made something like this for video cards as well.
    I wish there was any really useful info on that page or the corsair one. Taking off the top to look at the PCB of the pump is hardly a "breakdown". Thanks for the link though.

  17. #42
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    wish we could see under the copper base, think you could help us with that redbeard?

  18. #43
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,510
    its goign to perform worse if they dont get a decent rad

    for example the built in pump waterblock from swiftech was pretty good because there rads were good

  19. #44
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    San Antonio
    Posts
    20
    Someone once explained the math to me when I asked about running an OC'd Penryn quad on a single 120 and it wasn't feasible.
    Single 120 with i7 would be worse. Wouldn't it?
    Asus R2G | i7 920 D0 @ 4.0 | Asus HD 6950 | 6GB Corsair DDR3-1600 C7 | OCZ Vertex 120GB | Antec CP-850 | Antec 1200 v3 | Liteon SATA DVD Burner | Win 7 Pro X64 | BenQ FP241VW |
    No matter where you go, there you are.

  20. #45
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    852
    I think people are being way to negative. No, it's not a high-performance WC loop relative to custom built WC loops, but I'm sure corsair didn't put out a product that performs worse than comparative air-cooling. Now testing will determine this so let's just wait and see. Also, it seems to be best for small cases.

    I have high hopes for this because putting a 120mm rad in front of my SG05 Mini-ITX case was something I was thinking about doing actually. Was thinking about installing a WC loop, but realized it'd be a lot of trouble and cost tons too. This I think would work much better than my geminii that I have currently. It's a massive piece of metal, and it works, but there is definite room for improvement.

  21. #46
    Corsair Rep
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    222
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    wish we could see under the copper base, think you could help us with that redbeard?
    Sorry - not going to show you guys the pin/fin alignment quite yet. I'm sure that some review site will take the whole thing apart and take some pics for you though.

  22. #47
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,510
    Quote Originally Posted by Praxis1452 View Post
    I think people are being way to negative. No, it's not a high-performance WC loop relative to custom built WC loops, but I'm sure corsair didn't put out a product that performs worse than comparative air-cooling. Now testing will determine this so let's just wait and see. Also, it seems to be best for small cases.

    I have high hopes for this because putting a 120mm rad in front of my SG05 Mini-ITX case was something I was thinking about doing actually. Was thinking about installing a WC loop, but realized it'd be a lot of trouble and cost tons too. This I think would work much better than my geminii that I have currently. It's a massive piece of metal, and it works, but there is definite room for improvement.
    does swiftech have something better then this

    it was pump waterblock and then you can just add a your swiftech rad and your good to go

  23. #48
    Xtreme CCIE
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    3,842
    $10 says this is NOT as good as those numbers claim, excepting on low-power CPUs.

    That equipment just isn't enough to beat a TRUE by that much. It might beat it... but that margin just seems pretty high. And, really, those are manufacturer-provided numbers.
    Dual CCIE (Route\Switch and Security) at your disposal. Have a Cisco-related or other network question? My PM box is always open.

    Xtreme Network:
    - Cisco 3560X-24P PoE Switch
    - Cisco ASA 5505 Firewall
    - Cisco 4402 Wireless LAN Controller
    - Cisco 3502i Access Point

  24. #49
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    Quote Originally Posted by wrangler View Post
    Someone once explained the math to me when I asked about running an OC'd Penryn quad on a single 120 and it wasn't feasible.
    Single 120 with i7 would be worse. Wouldn't it?
    as temperature rises, the volume of heat moved from the same airflow increases. the formula is simplified by a C/W ratio, Celsius/Watts, if its 100 watts of heat, and the difference between the water and air is 10 degrees C. then the C/W is 10/100, or .1 degrees Celsius per Watt of heat.

    so if you throw 200W at it, then the temp increases to 20C above ambient for that same loop (in theory, remember its simplified). its not so much that a radiator cant handle the heat, its can it remove enough heat to keep it in safe temperature levels at the max fan speed desired/available.

    there is a very good chance that a single 120mm radiator can handle a cpu. if you double the air flow, its very similar to doubling the surface area of the radiator. so a 120mm rad can handle alot, if you give it a strong enough fan, and deal with the noise of a vacuum cleaner being on 24/7

  25. #50
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    1,319
    Quote Originally Posted by ILikeCosmosS View Post
    its goign to perform worse if they dont get a decent rad

    for example the built in pump waterblock from swiftech was pretty good because there rads were good
    We don't know anything about the rad, don't be so quick to judge. I guess we really need to know specs before I start pulling numbers out of my arse (which I have already done once). I am re-looking over some of Martin's tests and this is getting more interesting.

    Swiftech's built in pump block setup was good because it was the same thing we used in normal setups. An Apogee GT and a DDC 3.1 (which can be modded to a 3.2). I doubt modding the pump would really do much for temps though with that block as it is already high flow.

Page 2 of 27 FirstFirst 1234512 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •