MMM
Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 105

Thread: AMD cuts Phenom II prices

  1. #51
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    194
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    You''re still writing stupid things

    You really think mainstream market is "near nil margin"?
    For five Rockfeller guys like you buying extreme edition cpu, there is 40 guys "low level" mainstream cpu. I know from where Intel and AMD will get the most money
    Judging from your response you're "in the know" somehow... So my question, do you have any idea what their profit margin might be?

    Anand already thought they were hurting(margins) before the price cuts.

    This is the downside to AMD's pricing strategy; while it's great for consumers it's not particularly great for AMD's profit margins.
    Don't get me wrong, I like AMD's pricing(considering building a PII rig)... That does not dismiss his "profit margin" point, which IMHO is probably razor thin.


    "The problem with designing something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of a complete fool."

  2. #52
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by T_Flight View Post
    Bud, I don't cry about anything. I'm not like you kids on here. I understand *why* things are the way they are. Wanna know why? Becasue of failing companies just like this one causing people like me that pay taxes to have to buy their sorry tails out of it. I don't feel a bit sorry for them, and we shouldn't be doing it.

    FYI, I got where I'm at today becasue I worked my ass off for it. I didn't go looking for free rides and handouts. I used my head for something other than a hat rack and realized that a day like this would come when I needed to put food on the table.

    If you really casred about AMD you wouldn't just be looking for the cheapest thing out there and begging them for chips at prices they can't afford to sell them for. That's precisely what has ran them into the ground. It's AMD's biggest fanboi's that are killing it quickly.
    AMD OPTERON(QUAD-CORE) MODEL 8384
    $2,204.07

    AMD OS2384WAL4DGI - OPTERON(QUAD-CORE) MODEL 2384
    $1,050.97


    desktop prices don't reflect all profits.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  3. #53
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,356
    I was with T Flight up until "I'm not like you kids on here."

    Now if that's not the most presumptuous and pompous thing I've ever heard...

  4. #54
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by T_Flight View Post
    It's real simple why they cut the prices. They just don't understand that they have to make a profit. It's what has got them in the dire situation they are now in. They keep making the same mistakes over and over again, and expect different results.

    Until they get a top level performing chip that will compete with their competition's finest and sell them at prices that will make them money they are never gonna be able to get out the pit they've created.

    Maybe you should let them know what they are doing wrong when you attend thier board meeting on tuesday.

  5. #55
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,756
    Quote Originally Posted by T_Flight View Post
    Bud, I don't cry about anything. I'm not like you kids on here. I understand *why* things are the way they are. Wanna know why? Becasue of failing companies just like this one causing people like me that pay taxes to have to buy their sorry tails out of it. I don't feel a bit sorry for them, and we shouldn't be doing it.

    FYI, I got where I'm at today becasue I worked my ass off for it. I didn't go looking for free rides and handouts. I used my head for something other than a hat rack and realized that a day like this would come when I needed to put food on the table.

    If you really casred about AMD you wouldn't just be looking for the cheapest thing out there and begging them for chips at prices they can't afford to sell them for. That's precisely what has ran them into the ground. It's AMD's biggest fanboi's that are killing it quickly.
    Hey forgot to tell you genius, it's "ad nauseam" and we got there due to all your anti AMD rants. You just can't keep them to yourself even if no one is interested in them. Sounds like some old fool growling in his beard
    Crosshair IV Formula
    Phenom II X4 955 @ 3.7G
    6950~>6970 @ 900/1300
    4 x 2G Ballistix 1333 CL6
    C300 64G
    Corsair TX 850W
    CM HAF 932

  6. #56
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,978
    This is what I was waiting for .... quad price war! Whoohoooo

    EDIT: Why wait.... whoohoooo
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	PIIX4_price2.jpg 
Views:	474 
Size:	50.0 KB 
ID:	93204  
    Last edited by JumpingJack; 01-19-2009 at 04:16 PM.
    One hundred years from now It won't matter
    What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
    How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
    -- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft

  7. #57
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    Quote Originally Posted by T_Flight View Post
    Becasue of failing companies just like this one causing people like me that pay taxes to have to buy their sorry tails out of it.
    Lol! You pay taxes for AMD? Explain this to me, I don't understand how?
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  8. #58
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,978
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    Lol! You pay taxes for AMD? Explain this to me, I don't understand how?
    I will explain ...

    He is not complaining about paying taxes for AMD, he is complaining about corporate welfare in general. The world has evolved into an abhorrence of the idea of 'failure', to the point that governments around the world will spend money like a drunken sailer providing a safety net for businesses that have proven to be non-viable with failed business models. As a taxpayer he is tired of governments throwing millions of dollars to support companies that cannot turn a profit.
    One hundred years from now It won't matter
    What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
    How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
    -- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft

  9. #59
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    Lol! You pay taxes for AMD? Explain this to me, I don't understand how?
    He is speaking of the govornment bailouts hapening here in the U.S. with our tax money.

    He has a habit of talking about things he knows nothing about like he is a expert. He has no idea of AMD's profit margins and yet he preaches about it
    Last edited by G0ldBr1ck; 01-19-2009 at 04:31 PM.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

  10. #60
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver
    Posts
    1,073
    Quote Originally Posted by JumpingJack View Post
    I will explain ...

    He is not complaining about paying taxes for AMD, he is complaining about corporate welfare in general. The world has evolved into an abhorrence of the idea of 'failure', to the point that governments around the world will spend money like a drunken sailer providing a safety net for businesses that have proven to be non-viable with failed business models. As a taxpayer he is tired of governments throwing millions of dollars to support companies that cannot turn a profit.
    then he should probably be complaining about his elected officials, who have a responsibility to the people versus a company who has a responsibility to turn a profit for shareholders by any means they can within the "law" ^^

    Edit: Also!! yay for quad wars!
    " Business is Binary, your either a 1 or a 0, alive or dead." - Gary Winston ^^



    Asus rampage III formula,i7 980xm, H70, Silverstone Ft02, Gigabyte Windforce 580 GTX SLI, Corsair AX1200, intel x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb, hp zr30w, 12gb corsair vengeance

    Rig 2
    i7 980x ,h70, Antec Lanboy Air, Samsung md230x3 ,Saphhire 6970 Xfired, Antec ax1200w, x-25m 160gb, 2 x OCZ vertex 2 180gb,12gb Corsair Vengence MSI Big Bang Xpower

  11. #61
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    2,978
    Quote Originally Posted by villa1n View Post
    then he should probably be complaining about his elected officials, who have a responsibility to the people versus a company who has a responsibility to turn a profit for shareholders by any means they can within the "law" ^^

    Edit: Also!! yay for quad wars!
    Exactly! If I want a company to succeed, I will buy their product. But hand out free money they did not earn--- darn striaght --- do I blame them for asking and taking? Nope, I blame the politician who pulls trigger and hands it out.
    One hundred years from now It won't matter
    What kind of car I drove What kind of house I lived in
    How much money I had in the bank Nor what my cloths looked like.... But The world may be a little better Because, I was important In the life of a child.
    -- from "Within My Power" by Forest Witcraft

  12. #62
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by JumpingJack View Post
    Exactly! If I want a company to succeed, I will buy their product. But hand out free money they did not earn--- darn striaght --- do I blame them for asking and taking? Nope, I blame the politician who pulls trigger and hands it out.
    But why blame AMD? Only the German Tax payers have paid them anything. I've heard nothing about AMD getting any money from the US Government, zero. We do know that they got seed money from New York state but those are state taxes. Since then folks from the UAE have stepped in. The rest of AMD prop-up money came from banks and large lenders.

    Bad for AMD, good for us but I expect them to fall even more. I don't believe AMD is making any profit Right now. This due more to the economy than Intel. But that's just the opinion of someone who according to "LowRun" who can't read
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  13. #63
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    612
    OT

    The Crash Course

    Ready to learn everything you need to know about the economy in the shortest amount of time?


    http://www.chrismartenson.com/crashcourse

  14. #64
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Jakarta, Indonesia
    Posts
    924
    Quote Originally Posted by T_Flight View Post
    It's real simple why they cut the prices. They just don't understand that they have to make a profit. It's what has got them in the dire situation they are now in. They keep making the same mistakes over and over again, and expect different results. They are still trying to compete at a low level with near nil profit margins and expect to survive and it's not working...it never has. You'd think that over the entire period of time since X2 they would've realized that.

    Until they get a top level performing chip that will compete with their competition's finest and sell them at prices that will make them money they are never gonna be able to get out the pit they've created.

    I keep saying it ad nauseum...
    Companies are supposed to be in buisness to make money. That is the ONLY reason they are in buisness. When they don't they cease to exist.
    Pardon the question, but are you really THAT thick ? I mean, if AMD has a competitive products against Intel top flight chips at the moment, that they can charge more accordingly, don't you think they would have done so ?

    They charge as much as what the market would accept, that's the bottomline. Yes, they're in a hole and making mistakes, but that doesn't mean they have to lie down and surrender, LOL.

    What are you suggesting in THE SHORT RUN, charge 400 US$ for a Phenom II 940 simply for maximizing profit per unit count ? You can always play "coulda, shoulda, woulda" game, but AMD has to fight with what they have at hand right now.

    The future will take care itself, for the better or worse, we don't really know, though i must say this failing situation isn't exactly a new territory for them -those AMD K6 days, bleh. Put down your AMD bashing stick, it's getting lame by the minute.

  15. #65
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    2,036
    Quote Originally Posted by G0ldBr1ck View Post
    He is speaking of the govornment bailouts hapening here in the U.S. with our tax money.

    He has a habit of talking about things he knows nothing about like he is a expert. He has no idea of AMD's profit margins and yet he preaches about it
    Hey, I didn't pretend to know what the exact numbers were. I just know the end result...

    They ain't enough to get them out of the red so they obviously ain't high enough are they?

    Good try at taking the focus off the problem though.

  16. #66
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere Up to my Ears in Ye Yo
    Posts
    1,124
    Quote Originally Posted by T_Flight View Post
    Bud, I don't cry about anything. I'm not like you kids on here. I understand *why* things are the way they are. Wanna know why? Becasue of failing companies just like this one causing people like me that pay taxes to have to buy their sorry tails out of it. I don't feel a bit sorry for them, and we shouldn't be doing it.

    FYI, I got where I'm at today becasue I worked my ass off for it. I didn't go looking for free rides and handouts. I used my head for something other than a hat rack and realized that a day like this would come when I needed to put food on the table.

    If you really casred about AMD you wouldn't just be looking for the cheapest thing out there and begging them for chips at prices they can't afford to sell them for. That's precisely what has ran them into the ground. It's AMD's biggest fanboi's that are killing it quickly.

    i dont know what to say


  17. #67
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Spain, EU
    Posts
    2,949
    Quote Originally Posted by soundood View Post
    i dont know what to say

    Don't say anything, the rants of this guy are hazardous. They can seriously damage your brain
    Friends shouldn't let friends use Windows 7 until Microsoft fixes Windows Explorer (link)


    Quote Originally Posted by PerryR, on John Fruehe (JF-AMD) View Post
    Pretty much. Plus, he's here voluntarily.

  18. #68
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    A huge portion of AMD's bleeding is from the ATI acquisition for which was over valued at the time of purchase and lost allot on intel chipset sales which further cut ATI's earning potential. If AMD had not bought ATI they would not have the millions in loan payments to make and would have been a much leaner company.

    The bread and butter of cpu sales is not the $300+ cost cpus, I would say generally most people go for a pre built computer with a cpu thats a little more expensive than the cheapest.

    You don't need a high end product to sell to the masses, you need a good affordable product, nobody needs say i7 for web browsing or office suites.

    You DO need a high end product to sell to the enthusiast that is more demanding and more apt to use the extra power.
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  19. #69
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    67
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    Don't say anything, the rants of this guy are hazardous. They can seriously damage your brain

  20. #70
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    1,656
    Quote Originally Posted by STaRGaZeR View Post
    Don't say anything, the rants of this guy are hazardous. They can seriously damage your brain
    Work Rig: Asus x58 P6T Deluxe, i7 950 24x166 1.275v, BIX2/GTZ/D5
    3x2048 GSkill pi Black DDR3 1600, Quadro 600
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 810

    Game Rig: Asus x58 P6T, i7 970 24x160 1.2v HT on, TRUE120
    3x4096 GSkill DDR3 1600, PNY 660ti
    PCPower & Cooling Silencer 750, CM Stacker 830

    AMD Rig: Biostar TA790GX A2+, x4 940 16x200, stock hsf
    2x2gb Patriot DDR2 800, PowerColor 4850
    Corsair VX450

  21. #71
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by highoctane View Post
    A huge portion of AMD's bleeding is from the ATI acquisition for which was over valued at the time of purchase and lost allot on intel chipset sales which further cut ATI's earning potential. If AMD had not bought ATI they would not have the millions in loan payments to make and would have been a much leaner company.

    The bread and butter of cpu sales is not the $300+ cost cpus, I would say generally most people go for a pre built computer with a cpu thats a little more expensive than the cheapest.

    You don't need a high end product to sell to the masses, you need a good affordable product, nobody needs say i7 for web browsing or office suites.

    You DO need a high end product to sell to the enthusiast that is more demanding and more apt to use the extra power.
    Man so many people miss that point about ATI on even Intel chipset motherboards. ATI wasn't selling enough Intel based boards to even count. Once ATI lost rage built in there wasn't much left them. I remember a lot of us here waiting for ATI's effort (motherboard).

    Anyway, prices cut and will be cut some more.
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  22. #72
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Saskatchewan, Canada
    Posts
    2,207
    Quote Originally Posted by AbelJemka View Post
    You''re still writing stupid things
    No everyone like can buy a 1000$ CPU!
    For you 200$-250$ is low level. And you're the guy crying about economy crysis!
    You really think mainstream market is "near nil margin"?
    For five Rockfeller guys like you buying extreme edition cpu, there is 40 guys "low level" mainstream cpu. I know from where Intel and AMD will get the most money



    PhII 940 was priced to be between Q9550 and Q9400 based on it perfomance same for PhII 920, between Q9400 and Q9300.
    And now after Intel pricecut? They are still at the same place!
    A place where they will sell well.
    I don't think you got the point.

    The point is AMD does not make an incredible amount of profit when they sell their top end chip for 225 dollars because the cost of the chip itself and R and D. They also have to lower the price of their other chips because it starts to compete with the rest of their line because of the similar pricing.

    It also doesn't help that these chips are not made by them, but by a third party. This 50 dollar price drop has removed a huge portion of the profit margin on this chip that probably had lower margins than the competition in the first place. What the point of selling a million chips if you are making pennies on each one. Margins are not the same thing as volume, which I think is the thing your thinking of.

    AMD needs new technology so that they can bring the price of their average chip up, so they can create larger margins and make more profit. AMD was at its most profitable when their average chip price was high, which also coincides when their chip were at their most competitive. Everyone knows this. AMD was losing the most money when its average price was at its lowest because of the paper thin margins on each chip sold.

    Although the economy is bad, if you make a fast enough chip, people will still buy. Especially if you have affordable MB and ram to accommodate it.

    This is the scenario NV is in at the moment they have an expensive chip but they have to sell it for very low margin because the competition is strong and they cannot let AMD gain marketshare.

    However the situation AMD is in, they cannot afford this approach because they do not have piles of extra cash nor do they have a tremendous marketshare to lose which is why this approach is used in the first place.

    Cheap chip for all benefits everyone but the company.
    Last edited by tajoh111; 01-19-2009 at 06:05 PM.

  23. #73
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Birmingham AL.
    Posts
    1,079
    Quote Originally Posted by T_Flight View Post
    .........................It's AMD's biggest fanboi's that are killing it quickly.
    You have said this many times and im very curius how you can actualy think that AMD fans are hurting the company. AMD fans make no decisions for AMD, AMD fans do buy the products that AMD are in busness to sell, AMD fans tend to invest in AMD.

    The first few times you have said this I figured you were just rambling but you keep saying it. Evidently you believe this and are trying to make a point that most of us do not see so if you would inlighten us........



    As far as price cut, It was enough to get me to order a 920 today when I already have a 940.
    Last edited by G0ldBr1ck; 01-19-2009 at 05:47 PM.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

  24. #74
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    746
    Quote Originally Posted by tajoh111 View Post
    I don't think you got the point.

    The point is AMD does not make an incredible amount of profit when they sell their top end chip for 225 dollars because the cost of the chip itself and R and D. It also doesn't help that these chips are not made by them, but by a third party. This 50 dollar price drop has removed a huge portion of the profit margin on this chip that probably had lower margins than the competition in the first place. What the point of selling a million chips if you are making pennies on each one.

    AMD needs new technology so that they can bring the price of their average chip up, so they can create larger margins and make more profit. AMD was at its most profitable when their average chip price was high. Everyone knows this. AMD was losing the most money when its average price was at its lowest because of the paper thin margins on each chip sold.

    Although the economy is bad, if you make a fast enough chip, people will still buy. Especially if you have affordable MB and ram to accommodate it.

    This is the scenario NV is in at the moment they have an expensive chip but they have to sell it for very low margin because the competition is strong and they cannot let AMD gain marketshare.

    However the situation AMD is in, they cannot afford this approach because they do not have piles of extra cash nor do they have a tremendous marketshare to lose which is why this approach is used in the first place.

    Cheap chip for all benefits everyone but the company.
    I don't understand you guys....you want AMD to price their parts higher against products that outperform? Do you understand VOLUME? Volume parts are not priced at $500+, AMD is priced to fit in the mainstream, where they will sell more chips. Intel selling a $1k processor is just catoring to the die-hard enthusiast who can afford it. How many of those are there vs the average joe who buys a laptop, or a cheap desktop?

    None of you can begin to make estimates about the margins on their new tech, nor can you know the yields of the new process.

  25. #75
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    PH II 920 and 940 are having much more sucess then PH I. AMD was erased from Retail market and is now coming again with this new CPU.
    And only came out 2 models.
    Wait for February with 6 AM3 models and it will be much better the it was with PH I. Many people (90%++) is waiting for AM3 models.

    And Intel new quad-core and price cuts where very very agressive response because they know that this PH II is going to give them harder times then with PH I.
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •