4 x Patriot Warp v2's on ARC-1220
4 x Patriot Warp v2's on ARC-1220
2x 150GB VelociRaptor's RAID 0 - OS/App. Drive
Intel Matrix - Maximus Extreme
Last edited by serialkilla277; 01-20-2009 at 01:33 AM.
supertalent 32gb sata mini pcie ssd @ asus eee pc900
Last edited by NapalmV5; 02-20-2009 at 03:44 PM.
Boot & App Volume:
Mirror of Fujitsu MBA3147RC 15K SAS Drives
Data Volume:
8x500GB WD & Samsung 7200RPM SATA in RAID-5 on Areca ARC-1220
(HDTune doesn't show the real capacity of 3160GB usable due to an issue with supporting 64-bit LBA in the program--as such, the true access time isn't shown either which is around 15ms)
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
3XWD 40GB in RAID 0 -128K stripes. With amd SB750 controller.
Last edited by 3dsag3; 02-21-2009 at 10:33 AM.
MOBO=Asrock P67 Xtreme6
CPU=I5 2500K
RAM=2x2GB GSKILL Ripjaw X 1600 CL7
STORAGE= Barracuda 7200.12 500GB + 1TB NAS
COOLING=Scythe SCMG 2100 Rev. B
GFX= XFIRE 4850
POWER=TT 650 TRX
CASE=ANTEC P180
Raid 0 results are all based on two drives.
OCZ core is single drive (performance was so bad I wasn't going to buy another one to see raid results).
All results are on OS based drives untweaked, apart from the OCZ drive, which was tweaked to improve performance.
Last edited by Ao1; 02-22-2009 at 11:55 AM. Reason: clarification
NOTE: please dont take these numbers seriously dont want to make anyone cry
Last edited by NapalmV5; 02-26-2009 at 12:10 PM.
ahahah
What's up with your numbers? PCIe x8 doesn't even have remotely that much bandwidth.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
VR 150 raid 0 on ICH10R
i7 940/Rampage 2 Extreme/Corsair 6g Dominator/Corsair HX100W/GTX 580/SSD
@ NapalmV5
Config?
Their system is PhotoShop
Areca ARC 1231 use pcie 8x. Pcie 1x = 500 MB/s , 500x8 = 4 GB/seg max.
Bench show >10 GB/s
You have not seen as jumping the line at the end, ? , muahah
@ FEAR
lol come on you know my config
Originally Posted by Mr.Bean
ahahahFYI: its 12GB/s max !!!Their system is PhotoShop
Areca ARC 1231 use pcie 8x. Pcie 1x = 500 MB/s , 500x8 = 4 GB/seg max.
Bench show >10 GB/s
You have not seen as jumping the line at the end, ? , muahah
photoshop? right! im gonna spend all my time punching in all those numbers/dots/graphs
if you guys want more info check the storage subforum
Last edited by NapalmV5; 02-25-2009 at 07:30 AM.
F1 500gb
Hitachi 640gb
Hitachi 750gb (8mb)
Cavalier X
Biostar TP45-HP Ś E4600@3.13 ghz with Xigmatek Red Scorpion Ś OCZ ReaperX (2x2gb @ 782mhz : 4-4-4-12) Ś Xigmatek NRP-MC651 Ś
xfx 9600gt Alphadog edition @ 780/1950/1000 Ś X-fi Fatal1ty Ś Samsung F1 500gb Ś Hitachi 640gb & 750gb ŚCoolermaster Cavalier 3 (Silver/Windowed) Ś
Yes, but not what Ram do you use.@ FEAR
lol come on you know my config
DDR2, DDR3? OC or not?
No, it's really not. PCIe 1.x is 250MB/s per lane. Seeing as how all the Areca cards are PCIe 1.x x8, that means you're limited to ~2GB/s by the slot itself. 9GB/s average is simply impossible on that hardware and means one of the following:
- Benchmarks are screwing up (quite possible)
- You've got Windows setup to do insane caching, thus skewing true hardware performance greatly
- RTC slowdown
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
@ Particle
Napalm means 12GB/s. with MFT
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=218669
Ok then. Let's just not try and pass this off as hard drive performance when it is RAM being used as a generous cache.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
FYI: its not ram! it has nothing to do with pcie = xxxxMB/s
those of you not enjoying the numbers hope you got a good rub-in/not taking the numbers for fun you really got dire issues
heres the NOTE: please dont take these numbers seriously dont want to make anyone cry
late purposely
@ FEAR - all the info is @ thread: giga ep45 extreme/ddr2/q9650 @ 4.5ghz
Last edited by NapalmV5; 02-26-2009 at 12:09 PM.
The data has to get to the SSD somehow, and if you're going through a controller then it very well does have to do with PCIe bandwidth.
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
Ram-Timings and Ram-Clock?
^ 600mhz @ default 5-5-5-15
why so interested ?
you wanna pin point why your 1261 cant catch my 1231 ?
just let me get 4x faster ssd..
Just setup a raid 6 array on a 3ware 9690Sa-8I with BBU and 8xSeagate 7200.12 500gb
Here are some benchies:
why?^ 600mhz @ default 5-5-5-15
why so interested ?
you wanna pin point why your 1261 cant catch my 1231 ?
just let me get 4x faster ssd..
MFT profits from the performance of desktop-ram
So, you can use slower SSDs than your´s.
I think on a Core i7-system you have the best performance (better cpu-ram linking)
12x transcend 32gb mlc on areca1231ml 2gb raid6
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks