Yup, I agree about the first part; although, LGA775 won't be a dead platform for awhile to come. I think its lifespan compared to AM2 will be very similar. I also don't see Yorkfield and Deneb performing the same, at least from the charts we've seen thus far. The lead by Yorkfield isn't dramatic, but it's consistent.
For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.
.
.
yea clock to clock it seems yorkfield edges out deneb but it would be nice to see more benchmarks and games, etc. plus the cpus might get better after being out for awhile. but if deneb can overclock higher than yorkfield it might be a key point. idk you can only hope at this point but it doesn't seem like deneb will be what it was hyped up to be. its good but not perfect.
You have answered this in another thread also.
It may seem that certain posters have an inability to digest information.
It would help if they removed their dark green tinted sunglasses.
To other ranting posters about PHII being "bad".
I disagree.
If AMD lowers the prices a little after the intial sellout to the fanboi-teams, they have a very competing product in Deneb.
They will drop right into most AM2-board hence saving *a lot* compared to going the "Intel-ci7-route" (as long as there is only extremely high priced X58-board available).
PS/Edit:
Yorkies are also quite high priced compared to ci7 and PHII.
When AMD had 64-bit and Intel had only 32-bit, they tried to tell the world there was no need for 64-bit. Until they got 64-bit.
When AMD had IMC and Intel had FSB, they told the world "there is plenty of life left in the FSB" (actual quote, and yes, they had *math* to show it had more bandwidth). Until they got an IMC.
When AMD had dual core and Intel had single core, they told the world that consumers don't need multi core. Until they got dual core.
When intel was using MCM, they said it was a better solution than native dies. Until they got native dies. (To be fair, we knocked *unconnected* MCM, and still do, we never knocked MCM as a technology, so hold your flames.)by John Fruehe
It has often been said that Intel can't afford to let AMD fail completely because the Federal Govt would then classify them as a monopoly and then interfere with them.
I wonder how much truth there is to that point of view?
I would still wait till some other reviews show up before declaring a "complete slaughter", but it is increasingly looking like AMD's fate depends on what Intel wants to do with them.
Hmm, desktop comparisons are well and good but AMD's fate will be decided by how their server model competes with nehalem xeon parts.
TJ07 | Corsair HX1000W | Gigabyte EX58 Extreme | i7 930 @ 4ghz | Ek Supreme | Thermochill PA 120.3 | Laing DDC 12v w/ mod plexi top | 3x2gb Corsair 1600mhz | GTX 680 | Raid 0 300gb Velociraptor x 2 | Razer Lachesis & Lycosa | Win7 HP x64 | fluffy dice.
Yes, the Q6600 is an EPIC processor, and by non other than the best company in the world: Intel.Reconfirms my purchase of my q6600 being epic.
Its just mind blowing that even now, AMD has not caught up to Kentsfield. Good step in the right direction though.
Good direction would've been two years ago but to this date, it's too little too late, but then again, this is why the green company has had a long time track record of pulling such stunts, well deserve, they get it. Yoda!
And it's safe to say that these CPUs won't be costing $700 to $1000 now that they still can't catch up to Intel's new big guns. LOL. X2 3800+ $550, now? $32.99........LMAO.
ASUS P5B Deluxe P965 BIOS 1236 | Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 G0 8MBL2 @ 3.15GHZ | G.Skill DDR2 800 F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ & XTreem DDR 800 D9GMH - 4GB RAM Total | 4:5 Ratio @ 350fsbx9 | Tuniq Tower 120 | BFG GeForce 9800GTX | Seagate 2x 250GB Perpendicular HDDs RAID-0 | PC Power & Cooling Silencer 750W EPS12V | Samsung TOC T240 24" LCD Monitor |
you weren't saying the exact thing. you were arguing in ways of why deneb wasn't going to be good. i remember you saying that it wasn't going to be that great because all it was was a die shrink and a larger cache. from what we have seen its much more than that with how well it can overclock. but we cool?
you would think that you would want to try to sound less like a fanboy if you actually wanted people to take your comments seriously.
FX-8350(1249PGT) @ 4.7ghz 1.452v, Swiftech H220x
Asus Crosshair Formula 5 Am3+ bios v1703
G.skill Trident X (2x4gb) ~1200mhz @ 10-12-12-31-46-2T @ 1.66v
MSI 7950 TwinFrozr *1100/1500* Cat.14.9
OCZ ZX 850w psu
Lian-Li Lancool K62
Samsung 830 128g
2 x 1TB Samsung SpinpointF3, 2T Samsung
Win7 Home 64bit
My Rig
I was saying its IPC increase wouldn't be that much more significant than is usually the case with shrinks and cache increases and specifically said that 15 to 20% IPC increase claims were ludicrous.
You and others were outraged I was making such claims.
I never stated it would be a poor overclocker.
Terrific review guys, cheers...^^
Shouldn't this be in the Xtreme News or AMD subforum though?![]()
This is the clock-for-clock comparison for Agena and Deneb.
![]()
Put some 2.4+ at deneb's nothbridge and u will see how far behind is the phenom II...(i've seen 920 phenom II @ 2.6 easily...)
I'm pretty sure every intel guy would do this in his kentsfield/yorkfield when he would overclock....(if they had one)
So i'm pretty sure phenom II has some aces in his sleeve....
Cpu:Phenom ΙΙ 965 c3 @ 4.1Ghz/2.8nb (air cooled)
Mobo: Asus M3a79-T Deluxe
Ram:A-data 2x2 800+ @ 1000
Gpu:Asus Hd4850 512mb @ 700/1050(sycthe Musashi)
Hdd:500gb Seagate 7200.11
Psu:Corsair Hx620
Cooling: TRue(dual fan)
Case: Coolermaster Haf 932...
Vozer, could you make the deneb vs kentsfeld and deneb vs yorkfield comparison? and if you have time, yorkfield vs kentsfield...
Last edited by noki; 01-04-2009 at 11:39 AM.
U are already high on fsb at 3.7 to 4 .
Phenom II can go to 3.7 -4 and tweak tha nb at whatever speed u want.
@ 2.6nb and some ddr3 maybe we will have nice numbers. Here we aren't just overclockers we tweak everything.
Yorkfield's everything is just fsb which u already tweak...
@64bit windows phenom II kick ass too mate u aren't even informed.
Cpu:Phenom ΙΙ 965 c3 @ 4.1Ghz/2.8nb (air cooled)
Mobo: Asus M3a79-T Deluxe
Ram:A-data 2x2 800+ @ 1000
Gpu:Asus Hd4850 512mb @ 700/1050(sycthe Musashi)
Hdd:500gb Seagate 7200.11
Psu:Corsair Hx620
Cooling: TRue(dual fan)
Case: Coolermaster Haf 932...
Well to be fair for that comparison to be chew worthy you'd need to lower the phenom's clock but raise tits northbridge, htt and hypertransport clocks.
Also likely the memory because I havnt seen any with good mhz and timings.
Edit: under closer inspection 1gb 800mhz memory vs. 8gb 1000mhz memory...
Edit 2: sorry was gonna say 400/500 at first then changed it.
Last edited by Caveman787; 01-04-2009 at 02:00 PM.
Sigh! Please point us to the evidence that more ram helps cinebench. If anything, my NB is being tasked with such high fsb and 8Gbs. This is my everyday system and this is currently the hardware config. that's all. Of course, you guys can consider this a target when you get your PIIs. All you hear is excuses, DDR3, Expensive, Hot, etc.
This is a Q9550 with 8GB of cheap DDR2 ram at DDR2 990Mhz with loose timings.
Bookmarks