Which one to choose between Radeon HD 4870 or GeForce GTX 260?
Which one to choose between Radeon HD 4870 or GeForce GTX 260?
|Rampage II Gene| |Corei7 920| |Coolermaster V8||Kingsten DDR3 1333 3GB| |HIS 4850| |Seagate 500GB 32mb|
|Corsair HX620W| |Creative X-fi Built-in| |Creative 7.1 Speakers| |A4Tech X7 keyboard & Deathadder Mouse| |Dell 21’ CRT|
The 260 is better. You can overlock it and get a 280. All tests say it even beats out the 280. But you'll have to deal with the price.
Nothing anymore
The gtx260 can overclock higher than the gtx280 can.
He doesn't mean to just overclock it to the same clocks as the gtx280 because then it'd still lose by a little atleast. He meant towards the max stock air overclock which is somewhere around 730+ core/ 1450+ shaders/2200+ memory
I don't think the slightly larger bus makes to much a difference in performance.
How come everyones on the gtx260 bandwagon now? The 4870 performs just as good as the gtx260 and for a cheaper price.
Because they've bought the hype once again, as usual.
Here's a review that's tested both since Cat. 8.12's. IOW, the 4870 & 260 are about as equal as you're gonna get. General conclusion is:
So I'd say pick the one that works best with the games you play most, and quit worrying about it....From the performance aspect, ATI made some nice improvements with their 8.12 driver, and they're reflected here. Although the HD 4870 1GB didn't manage to overtake NVIDIA in every test, they did catch up in some, and even overtook in a couple. Those couple being Crysis Warhead and Fallout 3. We also saw some great performance in non-holiday titles as well, which included S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Clear Sky and Unreal Tournament III. In fact, we found that ATI performed better on all the non-holiday titles used here.
To fine-tune our results a little bit more, let's take our highest-available resolution for each game, 2560x1600. This resolution is the most intensive available right now, and as a result, it's a good one to see where one GPU excels over another. If we take a look at performance data at that resolution for each game (1920x1200 for Dead Space), we see that ATI performed the best in four titles (Crysis Warhead, Fallout 3, Clear Sky and UT III), while NVIDIA lead the other four (Call of Duty: WaW, Dead Space, Far Cry 2 and Left 4 Dead). From that standpoint, the cards appear to be almost identical, each having their own set of games in which they excel....![]()
AUDIO-ASUS Xonar DX SPKR-audioengine 5 CASE-Cooler Master Stacker RC-810-SSN1 CPU-E8400 - Q815 @ 4 GHz @ 1.23V FANS-Noctua GPU-EVGA GTX 660/2GB HDD-Raptor 150 ADFD + WD1600YS HSF-Noctua NH-U12 LCD-NEC 20WMGX² @ 1680x1050 MOBO-abit IP35 Pro - BIOS 16 + bolt mod OS-XP Pro x64 PSU-XFX 750W Black Edition RAM-G.Skill PC2-8800 Pi 2x2GB @ 1,128 @ 1.92v TIM-Arctic Cooling MX-2 UPS-TRIPPLITE SU1000XLa + Noctua fan mod
I voted GTX260-216. Mine is clocked at 720/1520/1230. I have run every performance heavy game out there at the highest settings possible in each case and this card has never blinked. The GPU has never even passed 49C for temp, no matter what I throw at it.
Asus Z87 Deluxe
Intel I7 4770K/CM Eisberg 240L
16G (2X8) Corsair Vengance Pro DDR3 1600 CMY16GX3M2A1600C9
Corsair HX 850wt PSU
2X Corsair Neutron GTX 120GB SSD
1X Corsair Neutron GTX 240GB SSD
1 Seagate SATA3 2TB HDD
EVGA GTX780 sc
Creative SB ZXR
CM HAF XM case
Asus VG248 24" 3D LCD monitor
Audioengine A5+speakers/AS8 sub
Win8 Pro
Actually any 260 that can hit 700+mhz on the core and 1500+mhz on the shaders will outperform a stock 280 regardless of the slightly bigger bus and extra shaders.
There used to be a ton of game benchmarks around from anandtech, guru3d, firingsquad.com that would back this up too comparing the value of an overclocked 260 to a 280.
My 192shader 260 runs at 760core 1534shader and 2500mem 24/7 gaming use with the stock cooler, thats a good bit faster than a 280 and it would actually take a slightly overclocked 280 to be able to keep up with it.
It isnt hype, its a fact. I have owned both a HD 4870 and a GTX 260 so I speak from experience and once both are overclocked the 260 leaves the 4870 in the dust. The 4870 does not really overclock all that well and gains very little from the OC, the 260 on the other hand overclocks like mad and scales very well in making performance gains from its overclock.
Bottom line once both are overclocked the HD 4870 cant hang.
were do u get that if u properly install at drivers u get perfect drivers for the most part and u dont get stuck on one beta for new games and one for older ones, and its not polite to triple post when u can edit
also, the 4870 will last longer since ati updates drivers for optimization affter the card isnt the top card, were NV will leave u and your g200 when the new 3xx are out in 8 months.
then u have to consider what games u have and if u like video playback more and IQ or the most fps, and if u want to play dx9 (NV) and dx10 overlays or dx10.x and ogl (ati). so if its a quick upgrade path then the 260 but if u keep it then the 4870 for gaming or if u do workstation or videos then ati
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
The 4870 can overclock to 850 core/ 4800 memory. The first few mhz on the core to 800 I agree doesn't make a massive difference but when you get to 830+ it gets a big boost from higher shader ratio I believe.
Last I knew they were pretty even in all benchmarks a few go one way or another but overall there right there with each other.
Crysis should be ignored essentially and some early benches were drivers weren't available for new games or the review used old drivers for 1 card and brand new 1's for the other. That seemed to happen in some unfair reviews. Crysis because it was so very pro nvidia before that ati card performance was crippled then it balanced out and I think it went back to ati doing crappy in that game for some reason.
Last edited by Caveman787; 01-02-2009 at 05:51 PM.
Where did I say anything about properly installing drivers? and what does that have to do with the fact that Nvidias drivers are leagues ahead of ATI's?
Uh no, you have it backwards. When the 4870 and the 260 were first released it was ATI who was winning, Nvidia optimized their drivers and as an end result the 260 is now the faster card.
ROTFCOPTERThat doesnt mean that the GTX 260 stops getting support, you do realize that the 8800GTX which has been out for over 2yrs now is still being supported by Nvidia do you not?
And do you honestly think ATI will not be releasing new cards either?![]()
260
Asus Maximus SE X38 / Lapped Q6600 G0 @ 3.8GHz (L726B397 stock VID=1.224) / 7 Ultimate x64 /EVGA GTX 295 C=650 S=1512 M=1188 (Graphics)/ EVGA GTX 280 C=756 S=1512 M=1296 (PhysX)/ G.SKILL 8GB (4 x 2GB) SDRAM DDR2 1000 (PC2 8000) / Gateway FPD2485W (1920 x 1200 res) / Toughpower 1,000-Watt modular PSU / SilverStone TJ-09 BW / (2) 150 GB Raptor's RAID-0 / (1) Western Digital Caviar 750 GB / LG GGC-H20L (CD, DVD, HD-DVD, and BlueRay Drive) / WaterKegIII Xtreme / D-TEK FuZion CPU, EVGA Hydro Copper 16 GPU, and EK NB S-MAX Acetal Waterblocks / Enzotech Forged Copper CNB-S1L (South Bridge heat sink)
NV cut the IQ with the 180, and added quad support ati adds quad support with this months driver. u or i cant say that one is better they each have different things that they are better at
and i said driver optimization, sure they will make it not crash but the highly optimized drivers go away
also if u care for dx9 with dx10 overlays go NV if u want it to last or do things other than 3d gaming go with the ati
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
Any 4870 xfire vs. 260 SLI reviews? This might help in deciding too
i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.
*sniff sniff* I smell a "my nVidia penis is better than your ATi penis" thread in the making.
"Prowler"
X570 Tomahawk | R7 3700X | 2x16GB Klevv BoltX @ 3600MHz CL18 | Powercolor 6800XT Red Devil | Xonar DX 7.1 | 2TB Barracuda | 256GB & 512GB Asgard NVMe drives | 2x DVD & Blu-Ray opticals | EVGA Supernova 1000w G2
Cooling:
6x 140mm LED fans, 1x 200mm LED fan | Modified CoolerMaster Masterliquid 240
Asrock Z77 thread! | Asrock Z77 Extreme6 Review | Asrock P67 Extreme4 Review | Asrock P67 Extreme4/6 Pro3 thread | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 thread | Asrock Z68 Extreme4 Review | Asrock Z68 Gen3 Thread | 8GB G-Skill review | TK 2.ZERO homepage | P5Q series mBIOS thread
Modded X570 Aorus UEFIs
I'll play you game here man: prove to me they didn't cut IQ and I will believe you....
there is no "fact" in this drivers argument so leave it to die please, both drivers have issues for some; but for the vast majority in both camps both companies drivers work perfectly fine and dandy.![]()
Last edited by SNiiPE_DoGG; 01-02-2009 at 08:09 PM.
no, you have no way to say nvidia didn't cut IQ so how can you say this?
You are not an nvidia software engineer and neither is Zanzabar so neither of you can validly argue this point to the affirmative or the negative.
lets keep these discussions to performance numbers alone, and those numbers tell me that the 260-216-55nm beats a 4870 1gb by 4% on average, with wins and losses on both sides and extremely similar power consumption.
the cards are the same: pick the cheaper one (currently the HIS 48701gb on newegg)
Last edited by SNiiPE_DoGG; 01-02-2009 at 08:18 PM.
i cant afford to have a bunch of cards but i would do a review if i had them, there was one review with SS in the news section i cant find it, im looking though
Last edited by zanzabar; 01-02-2009 at 08:30 PM.
5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi
Bookmarks