Page 3 of 14 FirstFirst 12345613 ... LastLast
Results 51 to 75 of 349

Thread: AMD Phenom II 920 & 940 Full Review [UPDATED with more tests]

  1. #51
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    Quote Originally Posted by Mechromancer View Post
    While the Phenom IIs don't suck, they still are not equal to Penryn clock per clock.
    But is close. Maybe AM3 CPU´s will close the Gap
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    And AMD is only a CPU manufactor due to stolen technology and making clones.

  2. #52
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    Perhaps nb/hypertransport and core scaling with overclocking will close the gap.

    Also these setups do have some slight differences with the memory setup if i'm not mistaken and that could account for a small bit of difference.

  3. #53
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    212
    Quote Originally Posted by v_rr View Post
    But is close. Maybe AM3 CPU´s will close the Gap
    maybe,but i dont want to see again 939 - > AM2

  4. #54
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    next bench throw the Q9400 if deneb fall in between the Q9400 and 9450.

    still want to know how much of that 12mb of cache is helping.
    Last edited by demonkevy666; 12-29-2008 at 07:58 PM.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

  5. #55
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    2,834
    Thank you for the updated review! When does the clock-per-clock comparison arrive?

    For my part I know nothing with any certainty, but the sight of the stars makes me dream.

    ..

  6. #56
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    Quote Originally Posted by YukonTrooper View Post
    Thank you for the updated review! When does the clock-per-clock comparison arrive?
    i was wondering the same thing. i am looking forward to a clock per clock comparison between Phenom, Phenom 2, Kentsfield and a Yorkie. That will show it true colors. and then a max over clock on all of them and then a comparison of benches at the max oc. thanks for the updated review!
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  7. #57
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    288
    Quote Originally Posted by YukonTrooper View Post
    Thank you for the updated review! When does the clock-per-clock comparison arrive?
    See Petnorth on 1st page for a rough estimate on deneb vs york














    pr

  8. #58
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    235
    Not bad considering it costs 279,90€ in Finland (Tax edition)
    And OC's to 3,8-4ghz pretty easily. ( I think I can say that)


    Q6600 costs <190€ though

  9. #59
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    235
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] hipno650 View Post
    and then a max over clock on all of them and then a comparison of benches at the max oc.
    That would be nice indeed
    Last edited by donitsi; 12-29-2008 at 10:27 PM.

  10. #60
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    1,248
    OverClocker_gr: thx for very great tests! , will you compair stock NB vs 2500mhz+ also when you make test @ 3.7ghz?(if you clock cpu dont forget to clock nb also)

  11. #61
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Skopje, Macedonia
    Posts
    1,716
    Keep up the good work guys! So, at stock settings Deneb is:
    1) Clock for clock similar to Kentsfield in performance
    2) similar to Yorkfield in power consumption
    3) as good for OC-ing as Kentsfield and Yorkfield

    I'm curious to see the clock for clock comparisons at 3.7GHz...

  12. #62
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    northern ireland
    Posts
    1,008
    Any way of removing the gpu bottleneck? We are not learning much when a 2.4ghzkentsfield keeps up with this generations finest. Or just run some cpu intensive tests. Get a bit of folding going down. Thanks for the effort man, Must eat up some time doing all this but it is appreciated. Also, if you oc all cpus to 3.7 will that not make the fact that you are gpu limited even more pronounced and every cpu will have a equal score? One more thing, Any thoughts on how deneb overclocks?

  13. #63
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Shimla , India
    Posts
    2,631
    Crysis n' crysis warhead result would also be so good!!

  14. #64
    I am Xtreme FlanK3r's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Czech republic
    Posts
    6,823
    OC gr:
    what is max stable OC? About 3.8GHz? And what is power com. + temperatures? Thx man
    ROG Power PCs - Intel and AMD
    CPUs:i9-7900X, i9-9900K, i7-6950X, i7-5960X, i7-8086K, i7-8700K, 4x i7-7700K, i3-7350K, 2x i7-6700K, i5-6600K, R7-2700X, 4x R5 2600X, R5 2400G, R3 1200, R7-1800X, R7-1700X, 3x AMD FX-9590, 1x AMD FX-9370, 4x AMD FX-8350,1x AMD FX-8320,1x AMD FX-8300, 2x AMD FX-6300,2x AMD FX-4300, 3x AMD FX-8150, 2x AMD FX-8120 125 and 95W, AMD X2 555 BE, AMD x4 965 BE C2 and C3, AMD X4 970 BE, AMD x4 975 BE, AMD x4 980 BE, AMD X6 1090T BE, AMD X6 1100T BE, A10-7870K, Athlon 845, Athlon 860K,AMD A10-7850K, AMD A10-6800K, A8-6600K, 2x AMD A10-5800K, AMD A10-5600K, AMD A8-3850, AMD A8-3870K, 2x AMD A64 3000+, AMD 64+ X2 4600+ EE, Intel i7-980X, Intel i7-2600K, Intel i7-3770K,2x i7-4770K, Intel i7-3930KAMD Cinebench R10 challenge AMD Cinebench R15 thread Intel Cinebench R15 thread

  15. #65
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Mars
    Posts
    425
    Quote Originally Posted by eric66 View Post
    in high res nehalem sucks phenom rules lol at least closes the gap dramatically
    maybe in high rez the bottleneck is not the cpu

    btw i don't really understand the farcry2 high res results as there is no difference between i920 and i940...does somebody have an explanation ?
    Last edited by herderien; 12-30-2008 at 04:37 AM.
    Core i7 2700k@4,8ghz HT off- 1.41v / Gainward GTX580 GooD 850/1700/2200 / 2X4Gb G.Skill Ares 1833C9 / Z77 Sabertooth / Crucial M4 64 Gb / WD 320Gb and 640GB / Corsair H80 / Corsair 620 HX

  16. #66
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    Quote Originally Posted by donitsi View Post
    Not bad considering it costs 279,90€ in Finland (Tax edition)
    Onhan noita halvempiakin ysi-nelikymppisiä Phenomeita.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  17. #67
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    532
    Quote Originally Posted by v_rr View Post
    But is close. Maybe AM3 CPU´s will close the Gap
    Quote Originally Posted by Caveman787 View Post
    Perhaps nb/hypertransport and core scaling with overclocking will close the gap.

    Also these setups do have some slight differences with the memory setup if i'm not mistaken and that could account for a small bit of difference.
    Wishful thinking is fine, but in my opinion you are better off in the long term if you accept the truth.
    Overclocking and power consumption, on the other hand, might turn out to be ph II's competetive advantage, even though I would not bet my money on that.
    Last edited by Jacky; 12-30-2008 at 06:35 AM.
    Quote Originally Posted by freecableguy
    the idiots out number us 10,000:1

  18. #68
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    741
    In waiting of power compsumption results and average overclocking on air/water .
    But actually no one can say Phenom II is a bad product seeing the price. Preorder in Europe are 225€ for 920 and 275€ for 940 in average.
    AMD Phenom II X2 550@Phenom II X4 B50
    MSI 890GXM-G65
    Corsair CMX4GX3M2A1600C9 2x2GB
    Sapphire HD 6950 2GB

  19. #69
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Tre, Suomi Finland
    Posts
    3,858
    I'm looking at offers at sub-245€ for 940BE. And those are in Finland where chips are systematically 5-10% more expensive than in central EU.
    You were not supposed to see this.

  20. #70
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    324
    In sweden we have to pay about 270€ for the 940 phenom, to expensive but as it is only one store that has the prices up for it i expekt that the prices will naturally come down when more stores will list the phenoms.
    http://www.prisjakt.nu/produkt.php?p=376580
    E6600"L630A446"? @3600@1.?v cooled by Tunic Tower sitting on Abit AB9 Quad GT played on ASUS 8800GTX opperated by a lazy slacker!

  21. #71
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    GREECE
    Posts
    133
    In GREECE prices for 940 are 299 euro for some big retail shops and 243 euro for some smaller shops.
    Yet, there are a few shops that have PhII.
    After the official launch we expect to see better prices..
    Maybe, you should order yours from GREECE??
    9950@3760mhz 125TDP, VCORE 1,55, 2x1GB CELLSHOCK PC8000 4-4-4-12, VDIMM 2,1, ASUS M3A79-T, SAPPHIRE 4850 ,CORSAIR 750w, COOLERMASTER HAF 932,Watercooled by EK SUPREME, ΝΟΚΙΑ Ν95-GRAPHITE


    3.760mhz in CPUz

  22. #72
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    324
    well I am very tempted to, yes I am but still not impressed with the performance of the phenom 2 yet. Waiting for oc numbers before I decide.
    E6600"L630A446"? @3600@1.?v cooled by Tunic Tower sitting on Abit AB9 Quad GT played on ASUS 8800GTX opperated by a lazy slacker!

  23. #73
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Munich, DE
    Posts
    1,401
    Quote Originally Posted by PetNorth View Post
    Thanks man for the update!

    Updated (and extended) my previous summary too :P
    Well done.
    Think you have an error on the x264 calculations. I assume the results are given in Seconds.

  24. #74
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    2,476
    Quote Originally Posted by OverClocker_gr View Post
    maybe,but i dont want to see again 939 - > AM2
    I hope you mean with AM3 cause I'm the same way I was POed big time. But if you mean AM2 I'd say its done after these chips. Ugrade path for current users. I'm curious what AM3 can bring but so far its just PII w/ ddr3.
    i3 2100, MSI H61M-E33. 8GB G.Skill Ripjaws.
    MSI GTX 460 Twin Frozr II. 1TB Caviar Blue.
    Corsair HX 620, CM 690, Win 7 Ultimate 64bit.

  25. #75
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Greece
    Posts
    212
    Quote Originally Posted by justapost View Post
    Well done.
    Think you have an error on the x264 calculations. I assume the results are given in Seconds.
    no,they are fps.

    Quote Originally Posted by herderien View Post
    maybe in high rez the bottleneck is not the cpu

    btw i don't really understand the farcry2 high res results as there is no difference between i920 and i940...does somebody have an explanation ?
    maybe your answer is on your first line.

Page 3 of 14 FirstFirst 12345613 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •