Did you read the comments above that o wise one?
Did you read the comments above that o wise one?
I read all of them, lol.
|-------Conner-------|
RIP JimmyMoonDog
2,147,222 F@H Points - My F@H Statistics:
http://fah-web.stanford.edu/cgi-bin/...e=Conman%5F530
So today I had my first real attempt at doing some sort of HDR photo, obviously I need a LOT more practice, but as they say, practice makes perfect.
3 shots, +2, 0, -2, Canon 40D, no tripod, photomatrix used.
Does Photoshop CS3 handle noise better? I find Photomatrix to be... Quite bad in that department, but that could just be a new guys opinion.
After using both CS3 and Photomatix, I find that CS3 gives more realistic results and less noise, while Photomatix usually gives more surreal and impressionist results - which most often results in a higher noise ratio.Originally Posted by JacobN
[ 3770K @ 4.2 : H100i : ASRock Z77E-ITX : GTX560 Ti : 16GB DDR3 1800 : +4TB : Bitfenix Prodigy : 2x Dell S2340M : Filco Majestouch-2 [Cherry Brown] : BX8a Deluxe]
Yeah Photomatix increases noise while CS3 usually supresses it. They both combine the images in very different ways.
Photomatix is also very bad at alignment, especially if you have trees/leaves in the image.
System
ASUS Z170-Pro
Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
Samsung 850 EVO (2)
EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
Corsair Hydro H90
NZXT S340
Nothing that really compares to you guys, but thought id post them anyway.
My first attempts to make HDR
what are the step by step guides to do hdr?
[SIZE="1"]Gateway MT6707 Notebook
Intel Pentium Dual Core T2060 1.6 GHz
Memory 2048 MB 533MHz DDR2 SDRAM
Intel Graphics Media Accelerator 950
224 MB shared video memory
High definition audio 2 channel
160 GB HD
8X Multi-format dual layer optical drive
802.11g wireless LAN
4 USB 2.0 ports
If you have done a transaction with me, please fill out my heatware. http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=64039
If you believe in Jesus Christ and are 100% proud of it, then put this in your sig
Nice shoes!!
I try to take pretty pictures
Canon 350D | Canon EF-S 18-55mm f3.5-5.6 | Sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 DG APO |
...
What the...???? Is that Jurassic Park? Awesome picture.
woops.. meant to include the above picture.
Last edited by Dcepter1; 10-22-2008 at 06:19 PM. Reason: Didnt get the picture.
ThanksWhat the...???? Is that Jurassic Park? Awesome picture.
woops.. meant to include the above picture.
It was to dark to see any dinos :-D
and the second picture from last night
sunset hdr
@ WiK1d
Hey mate, got that pic in 1024/768?
I love it.
-yonton228/timmy
"Man, I wish my country wasnt run by liberal mangina's that piss their pants at the sight of guns..."-turtletrax
Photoshop CS3, Photomatix, Bibble pro you name it.Sorry for the noise near the middle, bottom-half - was shot through a screen covered window :S
2long4u: What software are you using to tonemap? (Photoshop, Photomatix, etc)
I find Photoshop hard to use. I can get it done but things that should take very little time end up taking me hours.
Free Omastar!
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Read the comments about HDR and using 1 photo where you've adjusted exposures for a pseudo-HDR attempt. Found a situation where it helped get what I wanted, since I had no tripod when I took the shot and also needed to get it posted quickly with minimal PS time.
I don't often use this technique, but thought this one came out okay. (With no tripod available, I didn't try separate exposures, just adjusted +/- 2, then ran through Photomatix).
Not bad shazza, I'm seeing a bit of over-saturation and noise common to Photomatix but other than that, not bad.
System
ASUS Z170-Pro
Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
Samsung 850 EVO (2)
EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
Corsair Hydro H90
NZXT S340
Agree - especially in the ceiling, where it was too dark to begin with. Definitely would be better with separate shots, instead of working with one exposure. Also could have used some cleanup in PS.
@ S E T H - nice series!
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks