MMM
Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 116

Thread: It is offical: NVIDIA allows SLI on Intel X58!

  1. #26
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    940
    sooo just sli? or SLi and crossfire?

  2. #27
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    398
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    FB-DIMMs might not be the problem. It can be explained by the fact that MCP-100 is PCI-E 1.1. MCP-200 is 2.0 wouldn't downgrade Skulltrail's support for PCI-E 2.0.
    That was the primary problem with ST1. FB-DIMMS have 40% increased latency over their unbuffered DDR2 counterparts.

    or are you claiming that there is that much of a difference in FPS in the current crop of games between PCI-E 1.1 and 2.0?

    Let's hope ST2 will get better memory as well

  3. #28
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by NeedMoMegaHurtZ View Post
    That was the primary problem with ST1. FB-DIMMS have 40% increased latency over their unbuffered DDR2 counterparts.

    or are you claiming that there is that much of a difference in FPS in the current crop of games between PCI-E 1.1 and 2.0?

    Let's hope ST2 will get better memory as well
    Actually I'm claiming that difference will hardly matter on Current Skulltrail, nothing else.

    I think ST2 will have DDR3 and not FB-DIMMS that'd require a new IMC. No problem on X58 because it will use DDR3 X 3 ch and have an IMC. Thank goodness PCI-E 1.1 is gone I agree with Logos4.

  4. #29
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Papu View Post
    sooo just sli? or SLi and crossfire?
    It will support CF and SLI.

  5. #30
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    940
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    It will support CF and SLI.
    so wheres the problem? people with fat wallets will get their 280@s SLI on a non Sh***y chipset , and bang for bucko's can run their cheaper Ati Parts..
    its still goign to be ludicrously Expensive for a good few months , so it wont affect the market too much? , will the SLI deal run beyond X58
    Last edited by Papu; 07-14-2008 at 10:33 AM.

  6. #31
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Brooklyn, NY
    Posts
    2,771
    [QUOTE=Jimmer411;3140553]Since when was ATi dead? 2900XT? Thats about it. SLi isnt the end all to GPU sales... Prices win, and $750 GPU isnt the way to do it, hence the multiple price cuts before and immediatly after launch QUOTE]

    Yea I know however, ATI was able to survive this long was because of xfire on Intel chipsets. The general preference was Nvidia graphics cards up until now, but with Nvidia dropping prices...

    I guess in the end this will force each company to come out with more competitive and even cheaper products as we now have a choice.
    Asus Rampage Formula X48
    Intel Q9650 @ 4.33GHZ
    OCZ Platinum DDR2-800
    Palit 4870x2
    Creative Xi-Fi Extreme Music
    Corsair HX1000
    LL 343B Case
    Thermochill 120.3
    2xMCP355
    KL 350AT
    KL 4870X2 FC WB
    DD Chipset Block

  7. #32
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by Papu View Post
    so wheres the problem? people with fat wallets will get their 280@s SLI on a non Sh***y chipset , and bang for bucko's can run their cheaper Ati Parts..
    its still goign to be ludicrously for a good few months , so it wont affect the market too much? , will the SLI deal run beyond X58
    Some folks only want whats essential on their motherboards. It also sets a bad precedent!

    Not just needlessly picking on nVidia. There are threads about folks not wanting built-in sound, NICs and etc..... as well.

  8. #33
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    [QUOTE=situman;3140787]
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmer411 View Post
    Since when was ATi dead? 2900XT? Thats about it. SLi isnt the end all to GPU sales... Prices win, and $750 GPU isnt the way to do it, hence the multiple price cuts before and immediatly after launch QUOTE]

    Yea I know however, ATI was able to survive this long was because of xfire on Intel chipsets. The general preference was Nvidia graphics cards up until now, but with Nvidia dropping prices...

    I guess in the end this will force each company to come out with more competitive and even cheaper products as we now have a choice.
    QFT!

  9. #34
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Calgary, AB
    Posts
    2,219
    Quote Originally Posted by [XC] gomeler View Post
    Interesting. Not a huge fan of having these little "SLI chips" added to the boards but then again, a single board to do SLI and CF is good in my book.
    True, if it works out like this. Won't be cheap tho.
    MB Reviewer for HWC
    Team OCX Bench Team

  10. #35
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    For crying out loud NVIDIA is trying to sell balls for kidneys!!

    From i975 era we know that SLi is operable on Intel platform via simple driver hacking!

    Now NVIDIA is trying to sell SLi to Intel community with their "PEG tunnel chip", after has become clear that INTEL will not give them QuickPath license!

    This hasn't got anything with INTEL and NVIDIA making a dill. It's up to a mainboard makers good will and business judgment.

    Also NVIDIA is scared that good voice of the new ATI RV770 based cards, and the fact that they work natively in CrossFire on x58 platform will further erode their GPU market share, so they're making desperate moves, and in their own style they're spinning the story in a wrong to justify ripping of Intel oriented users by making the x58 mobos more expensive for the price ot their "magic" SLi chip!

    I don't hold that against them I only wonder how some people can suck this up pretending that they don't know that SLi worked on i975 w/o any addon chip, free of charge with just a driver hack!
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

  11. #36
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    1,491
    I don't see how this is a good thing. We are basically going to be asked to pay extra for this chip on the board when it could be quite easily done with drivers and no extra hardware to worry about.
    RIG 1 (in progress):
    Core i7 920 @ 3GHz 1.17v (WIP) / EVGA X58 Classified 3X SLI / Crucial D9JNL 3x2GB @ 1430 7-7-7-20 1T 1.65v
    Corsair HX1000 / EVGA GTX 295 SLI / X-FI Titanium FATAL1TY Pro / Samsung SyncMaster 245b 24" / MM H2GO
    2x X25-M 80GB (RAID0) + Caviar 500 GB / Windows 7 Ultimate x64 RC1 Build 7100

    RIG 2:
    E4500 @ 3.0 / Asus P5Q / 4x1 GB DDR2-667
    CoolerMaster Extreme Power / BFG 9800 GT OC / LG 22"
    Antec Ninehundred / Onboard Sound / TRUE / Vista 32

  12. #37
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Quote Originally Posted by zlojack View Post
    I don't see how this is a good thing. We are basically going to be asked to pay extra for this chip on the board when it could be quite easily done with drivers and no extra hardware to worry about.
    It's eerily similar to block pricing that cable companies use. Want NFL TV, but you have to buy all the sports channels including Fishing TV to get it.

    Yet ANOTHER thing monopolies do VERY well

    Perkam

  13. #38
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    @ the computer
    Posts
    2,510
    wait... can someone explain this to me in n00b terms? i'm still a little confused but this is what i'm understanding from all this. x58 mobos are the new nehalem chipset from intel that will natively support xfire just like x38/48 because intel will not give nvidia permission to have native SLI on this new chipset. so to get around this, nvidia makes their own chipset for mobo manufacturers to slap on the board so the board has both x58 chip + nForce200 chip?

    yup shady move. the more crap on the mobo, the more potential problem there will be. like mentioned before, some people just want a basic x58 mobo without all the other gunk on it because in the end, it'll just inflate the mobo prices.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  14. #39
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteFireDragon View Post
    wait... can someone explain this to me in n00b terms? i'm still a little confused but this is what i'm understanding from all this. x58 mobos are the new nehalem chipset from intel that will natively support xfire just like x38/48 because intel will not give nvidia permission to have native SLI on this new chipset. so to get around this, nvidia makes their own chipset for mobo manufacturers to slap on the board so the board has both x58 chip + nForce200 chip?

    yup shady move. the more crap on the mobo, the more potential problem there will be. like mentioned before, some people just want a basic x58 mobo without all the other gunk on it because in the end, it'll just inflate the mobo prices.
    Yes Welcome to Idiots-Ville, Colorado, where you buy an SLI chipset when you want to do Xfire

    Perkam

  15. #40
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    I think this says it best.

    Quote Originally Posted by Logos4
    thanks for posting about this confirmation. I've been among those not quite happy about having to pay an NVidia tax on X58 (knowing that SLI could probably work well without the NForce chip)...see recent thread about that, but well, this is probably better after all, at least a first step, allowing to avoid the purchase of a full and buggy NVidia mobo...so all in all better than the previous situation.
    This chip is similar to hardware DRM. IMHO, there's no probably to it the chip isn't needed unless nVidia changed something on the new cards to require them. That's equally sleazy.

  16. #41
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,743
    I want open SLI... I don't want to use a ing bridge chip!


    Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card

    LSI series raid controller
    SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
    Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
    OSes: Linux and Windows x64

  17. #42
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    352
    if AMD keeps releasing cards like the hd 4000 serires, pretty soon nobody will need SLi

  18. #43
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,210
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteFireDragon View Post
    wait... can someone explain this to me in n00b terms? i'm still a little confused but this is what i'm understanding from all this. x58 mobos are the new nehalem chipset from intel that will natively support xfire just like x38/48 because intel will not give nvidia permission to have native SLI on this new chipset. so to get around this, nvidia makes their own chipset for mobo manufacturers to slap on the board so the board has both x58 chip + nForce200 chip?
    no, NVidia won't make chipset anymore (at least in the beginning...); they found an agreement with Intel to integrate NForce 200 on X58 boards, which doesn't equal to an NVidia Chipset. NVidia will just provide the NForce PCIe bridge chip, nothing more. The boards equipped with it will support both CF (native on Intel mobos anyway) and SLI.

    It's more NVidia that won't allow SLI to run native on X58. They're selling the NForce200 for implementation on the X58 because they like our bank accounts very much...when everyone knows that SLI would run perfectly on an Intel chipset if NVidia drivers didn't prevent it.
    Last edited by Logos; 07-14-2008 at 12:00 PM.
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  19. #44
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    U.S.A.
    Posts
    4,743
    Quote Originally Posted by WRC View Post
    if AMD keeps releasing cards like the hd 4000 serires, pretty soon nobody will need SLi
    you right! I'm probably going to get 2 4870x2s


    Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card

    LSI series raid controller
    SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
    Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
    OSes: Linux and Windows x64

  20. #45
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,061
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteFireDragon View Post
    wait... can someone explain this to me in n00b terms? i'm still a little confused but this is what i'm understanding from all this. x58 mobos are the new nehalem chipset from intel that will natively support xfire just like x38/48 because intel will not give nvidia permission to have native SLI on this new chipset. so to get around this, nvidia makes their own chipset for mobo manufacturers to slap on the board so the board has both x58 chip + nForce200 chip?

    yup shady move. the more crap on the mobo, the more potential problem there will be. like mentioned before, some people just want a basic x58 mobo without all the other gunk on it because in the end, it'll just inflate the mobo prices.
    Hi, I wrote an editorial on the latest rumors/news last night before this news broke (complete with diagrams)...

    http://www.nehalemnews.com/2008/07/r...ts-latest.html

    Here are my observations on all of this...

    What's perhaps most interesting is that NVIDIA will support SLI on Intel boards with the NF200 PCIe bridge/switch for Bloomfield and Lynnfield and may never actually develop a chipset for this architecture. This may be a very good thing for all concerned. While NVIDIA makes excellent graphic cards, their chipsets on Intel platforms have always been riddled with issues. Gaming or 3D benching enthusiasts who want both SLI and the stability or reduced hassle of an Intel chipset may actually be getting what they want.

    NVIDIA will still make decent money from "enabling" SLI motherboards as they are rumored to be pricing the NF200 chips at a lofty $30 price point. Keep in mind that a full-fledged chipset will command around $50. So from the NVIDIA accountant's point of view, this looks very attractive... nearly $30 of pure margin from a very simple chip and no R&D costs associated with developing a new chipset.

    Intel should also be happy as they won't be competing againts NVIDIA for the enthusiast chipset market and any Intel platform can effectively be enabled with SLI by the motherboard manufacturer simply by designing a variation of their board that includes the NF200 chip.

    If these rumors end up being true, it looks to be a Win-Win-Win!

    EDIT: However, I read this morning that X58 will cost $70 so you are looking at $100 just for chipsets on an SLI enabled board and that means these boards will be $300-$400!
    Last edited by virtualrain; 07-14-2008 at 11:56 AM.

  21. #46
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Vancouver, BC
    Posts
    2,061
    BTW, does anyone here know exactly what a NF200 chip does?

    Thanks,
    -Chris.

  22. #47
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    @ the computer
    Posts
    2,510
    Quote Originally Posted by Logos4 View Post
    no, NVidia won't make chipset anymore (at least in the beginning...); they found an agreement with Intel to integrate NForce 200 on X58 boards, which doesn't equal to an NVidia Chipset. NVidia will just provide the NForce PCIe bridge chip, nothing more. The boards equipped with it will support both CF (native on Intel mobos anyway) and SLI.
    yeah i get the part that they won't be making their own mobo chipset anymore (like 680i, 780/790i etc). what i'm confirming is that this is an nvidia BRIDGE chip in order to use SLI on an inte chipset right?
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

  23. #48
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Planet Express HQ, US
    Posts
    385
    Quote Originally Posted by Nedjo View Post
    Also NVIDIA is scared that good voice of the new ATI RV770 based cards, and the fact that they work natively in CrossFire on x58 platform will further erode their GPU market share, so they're making desperate moves, and in their own style they're spinning the story in a wrong to justify ripping of Intel oriented users by making the x58 mobos more expensive for the price ot their "magic" SLi chip!
    yeah agree... this sound like a desperate move



    also does this mean X58 boards iwthout the n200 SB will support SLI as well?? anyone??
    "Thanks for the f-shack. Love, Dirty Mike & The Boys" - from Dirty Mike & The Boys

  24. #49
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    2,550
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteFireDragon View Post
    wait... can someone explain this to me in n00b terms? i'm still a little confused but this is what i'm understanding from all this. x58 mobos are the new nehalem chipset from intel that will natively support xfire just like x38/48 because intel will not give nvidia permission to have native SLI on this new chipset.
    True and wrong!
    1. x58 will natively support CrossFire, NOT 'cos they don't want to give nvidia ANY permission but 'cos ATI supports CrossFire on Intel chipsets w/o ANY charge!
    2. Intel DOESN'T want to sell to nvidia "QuaickPath" licence so nvidia can't make SLi chipset (or any other chipset) for Nehalem.
    3. In this situation only thing left for NVIDA to sell SLi on Intel chipset is to:
    a) "unlock" their drivers
    b) "unlock" their drivers and charge money for that by selling something touchable to mainboard makers (I guess if NVIDIA try to sell them "patch" for ForceWare, they would go mad)
    so to get around this, nvidia makes their own chipset for mobo manufacturers to slap on the board so the board has both x58 chip + nForce200 chip?
    That's partially true. Only thing that you've got wrong is the fact that nForce 200 isn't a chipset... it's probably something like PCI Express bridge on 780i(a) mainboards... but only nvidia knows exactly what it its...
    yup shady move. the more crap on the mobo, the more potential problem there will be. like mentioned before, some people just want a basic x58 mobo without all the other gunk on it because in the end, it'll just inflate the mobo prices.
    someone correct me if I'm wrong but basically all of the Nehalem mainboards are finished in terms of the design/layout and manufacturers are doing polishing to be ready for the next quarter and the launch of Nehalem!

    Who on Earth would do some serious redesign of this expensive mobo three months prior to CPU launch?

    Can someone spot a place for nForce 200 on these mainboards:

    http://www.nehalemnews.com/2008/06/s...boards-at.html
    Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.

  25. #50
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    France
    Posts
    1,210
    Quote Originally Posted by WhiteFireDragon View Post
    yeah i get the part that they won't be making their own mobo chipset anymore (like 680i, 780/790i etc). what i'm confirming is that this is an nvidia BRIDGE chip in order to use SLI on an inte chipset right?
    yes, that's correct. Read my post again, I edited it to add some info
    [SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]

Page 2 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •