sooo just sli? or SLi and crossfire?
sooo just sli? or SLi and crossfire?
That was the primary problem with ST1. FB-DIMMS have 40% increased latency over their unbuffered DDR2 counterparts.
or are you claiming that there is that much of a difference in FPS in the current crop of games between PCI-E 1.1 and 2.0?
Let's hope ST2 will get better memory as well
Actually I'm claiming that difference will hardly matter on Current Skulltrail, nothing else.
I think ST2 will have DDR3 and not FB-DIMMS that'd require a new IMC. No problem on X58 because it will use DDR3 X 3 ch and have an IMC. Thank goodness PCI-E 1.1 is goneI agree with Logos4.
so wheres the problem? people with fat wallets will get their 280@s SLI on a non Sh***y chipset , and bang for bucko's can run their cheaper Ati Parts..
its still goign to be ludicrously Expensive for a good few months , so it wont affect the market too much? , will the SLI deal run beyond X58
Last edited by Papu; 07-14-2008 at 10:33 AM.
[QUOTE=Jimmer411;3140553]Since when was ATi dead? 2900XT? Thats about it. SLi isnt the end all to GPU sales...Prices win, and $750 GPU isnt the way to do it, hence the multiple price cuts before and immediatly after launch QUOTE]
Yea I know however, ATI was able to survive this long was because of xfire on Intel chipsets. The general preference was Nvidia graphics cards up until now, but with Nvidia dropping prices...
I guess in the end this will force each company to come out with more competitive and even cheaper products as we now have a choice.
Asus Rampage Formula X48
Intel Q9650 @ 4.33GHZ
OCZ Platinum DDR2-800
Palit 4870x2
Creative Xi-Fi Extreme Music
Corsair HX1000
LL 343B Case
Thermochill 120.3
2xMCP355
KL 350AT
KL 4870X2 FC WB
DD Chipset Block
For crying out loud NVIDIA is trying to sell balls for kidneys!!
From i975 era we know that SLi is operable on Intel platform via simple driver hacking!
Now NVIDIA is trying to sell SLi to Intel community with their "PEG tunnel chip", after has become clear that INTEL will not give them QuickPath license!
This hasn't got anything with INTEL and NVIDIA making a dill. It's up to a mainboard makers good will and business judgment.
Also NVIDIA is scared that good voice of the new ATI RV770 based cards, and the fact that they work natively in CrossFire on x58 platform will further erode their GPU market share, so they're making desperate moves, and in their own style they're spinning the story in a wrong to justify ripping of Intel oriented users by making the x58 mobos more expensive for the price ot their "magic" SLi chip!
I don't hold that against them I only wonder how some people can suck this up pretending that they don't know that SLi worked on i975 w/o any addon chip, free of charge with just a driver hack!
Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.
I don't see how this is a good thing. We are basically going to be asked to pay extra for this chip on the board when it could be quite easily done with drivers and no extra hardware to worry about.
RIG 1 (in progress):
Core i7 920 @ 3GHz 1.17v (WIP) / EVGA X58 Classified 3X SLI / Crucial D9JNL 3x2GB @ 1430 7-7-7-20 1T 1.65v
Corsair HX1000 / EVGA GTX 295 SLI / X-FI Titanium FATAL1TY Pro / Samsung SyncMaster 245b 24" / MM H2GO
2x X25-M 80GB (RAID0) + Caviar 500 GB / Windows 7 Ultimate x64 RC1 Build 7100
RIG 2:
E4500 @ 3.0 / Asus P5Q / 4x1 GB DDR2-667
CoolerMaster Extreme Power / BFG 9800 GT OC / LG 22"
Antec Ninehundred / Onboard Sound / TRUE / Vista 32
wait... can someone explain this to me in n00b terms? i'm still a little confused but this is what i'm understanding from all this. x58 mobos are the new nehalem chipset from intel that will natively support xfire just like x38/48 because intel will not give nvidia permission to have native SLI on this new chipset. so to get around this, nvidia makes their own chipset for mobo manufacturers to slap on the board so the board has both x58 chip + nForce200 chip?
yup shady move. the more crap on the mobo, the more potential problem there will be. like mentioned before, some people just want a basic x58 mobo without all the other gunk on it because in the end, it'll just inflate the mobo prices.
I think this says it best.
This chip is similar to hardware DRM. IMHO, there's no probably to it the chip isn't needed unless nVidia changed something on the new cards to require them. That's equally sleazy.Originally Posted by Logos4
I want open SLI... I don't want to use aing bridge chip!
Asus Z9PE-D8 WS with 64GB of registered ECC ram.|Dell 30" LCD 3008wfp:7970 video card
LSI series raid controller
SSDs: Crucial C300 256GB
Standard drives: Seagate ST32000641AS & WD 1TB black
OSes: Linux and Windows x64
if AMD keeps releasing cards like the hd 4000 serires, pretty soon nobody will need SLi![]()
no, NVidia won't make chipset anymore (at least in the beginning...); they found an agreement with Intel to integrate NForce 200 on X58 boards, which doesn't equal to an NVidia Chipset. NVidia will just provide the NForce PCIe bridge chip, nothing more. The boards equipped with it will support both CF (native on Intel mobos anyway) and SLI.
It's more NVidia that won't allow SLI to run native on X58. They're selling the NForce200 for implementation on the X58 because they like our bank accounts very much...when everyone knows that SLI would run perfectly on an Intel chipset if NVidia drivers didn't prevent it.
Last edited by Logos; 07-14-2008 at 12:00 PM.
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
Hi, I wrote an editorial on the latest rumors/news last night before this news broke (complete with diagrams)...
http://www.nehalemnews.com/2008/07/r...ts-latest.html
Here are my observations on all of this...
What's perhaps most interesting is that NVIDIA will support SLI on Intel boards with the NF200 PCIe bridge/switch for Bloomfield and Lynnfield and may never actually develop a chipset for this architecture. This may be a very good thing for all concerned. While NVIDIA makes excellent graphic cards, their chipsets on Intel platforms have always been riddled with issues. Gaming or 3D benching enthusiasts who want both SLI and the stability or reduced hassle of an Intel chipset may actually be getting what they want.
NVIDIA will still make decent money from "enabling" SLI motherboards as they are rumored to be pricing the NF200 chips at a lofty $30 price point. Keep in mind that a full-fledged chipset will command around $50. So from the NVIDIA accountant's point of view, this looks very attractive... nearly $30 of pure margin from a very simple chip and no R&D costs associated with developing a new chipset.
Intel should also be happy as they won't be competing againts NVIDIA for the enthusiast chipset market and any Intel platform can effectively be enabled with SLI by the motherboard manufacturer simply by designing a variation of their board that includes the NF200 chip.
If these rumors end up being true, it looks to be a Win-Win-Win!
EDIT: However, I read this morning that X58 will cost $70 so you are looking at $100 just for chipsets on an SLI enabled board and that means these boards will be $300-$400!![]()
Last edited by virtualrain; 07-14-2008 at 11:56 AM.
BTW, does anyone here know exactly what a NF200 chip does?
Thanks,
-Chris.
True and wrong!
1. x58 will natively support CrossFire, NOT 'cos they don't want to give nvidia ANY permission but 'cos ATI supports CrossFire on Intel chipsets w/o ANY charge!
2. Intel DOESN'T want to sell to nvidia "QuaickPath" licence so nvidia can't make SLi chipset (or any other chipset) for Nehalem.
3. In this situation only thing left for NVIDA to sell SLi on Intel chipset is to:
a) "unlock" their drivers
b) "unlock" their drivers and charge money for that by selling something touchable to mainboard makers (I guess if NVIDIA try to sell them "patch" for ForceWare, they would go mad)
That's partially true. Only thing that you've got wrong is the fact that nForce 200 isn't a chipset... it's probably something like PCI Express bridge on 780i(a) mainboards... but only nvidia knows exactly what it its...so to get around this, nvidia makes their own chipset for mobo manufacturers to slap on the board so the board has both x58 chip + nForce200 chip?
someone correct me if I'm wrong but basically all of the Nehalem mainboards are finished in terms of the design/layout and manufacturers are doing polishing to be ready for the next quarter and the launch of Nehalem!yup shady move. the more crap on the mobo, the more potential problem there will be. like mentioned before, some people just want a basic x58 mobo without all the other gunk on it because in the end, it'll just inflate the mobo prices.
Who on Earth would do some serious redesign of this expensive mobo three months prior to CPU launch?
Can someone spot a place for nForce 200 on these mainboards:
http://www.nehalemnews.com/2008/06/s...boards-at.html
Adobe is working on Flash Player support for 64-bit platforms as part of our ongoing commitment to the cross-platform compatibility of Flash Player. We expect to provide native support for 64-bit platforms in an upcoming release of Flash Player following the release of Flash Player 10.1.
Bookmarks