hmm i am waiting for R700 .. maybe it wont just be 4870 CF ... maybe theres more (better way of making the 2 chips working together perhaps?) ... then ill make my decision
hmm i am waiting for R700 .. maybe it wont just be 4870 CF ... maybe theres more (better way of making the 2 chips working together perhaps?) ... then ill make my decision
"Thanks for the f-shack. Love, Dirty Mike & The Boys" - from Dirty Mike & The Boys
My gosh, Techreport is my favorite one so far. Everything about their review is so awesome, and makes all others almost "redundant"!
--two awesome rigs, wildly customized with
5.1 Sony speakers, Stereo 3D, UV Tourmaline Confexia, Flame Bl00dr4g3 Fatal1ty
--SONY GDM-FW900 24" widescreen CRT, overclocked to:
2560x1600 resolution at 68Hz!(from 2304x1440@80Hz)![]()
Updated List of Video Card GPU Voodoopower Ratings!!!!!
Yeah I noticed TechReport has really stepped it up recently. Their review had architecture coverage as well as real in-game tests along with synthetic benchmarks and image quality along with AA and AF tests. Very impressed
QFT, i find it quite funny that people don't care about them or vsync. Why spend all that money on hardware? Why bash consoles all the time if you have a tearing and/or jaggies on your PC?I just discovered that if a game doesn't have the option to enable Vsync the CCC won't let you do it in Vista
That and the issues with the X-Fi, i think i'm going back to XP.
i3-8100 | GTX 970
Ryzen 5 1600 | RX 580
Assume nothing; Question everything
QFT
If I'm playing single player, then eye candy is lovely. You can push all the settings as high as you want and enjoy the look of the game. In multiplayer, most competitive players, will have configs to reduce everything as much as possible. Not just for the FPS but also to see clearer.
AA is certainly off.
Guru3D: AMD Radeon HD 4870
http://www.guru3d.com/article/radeon...-review--asus/
Overclockersclub: PowerColor HD 4870 Review
http://www.overclockersclub.com/revi...rcolor_hd4870/
Last edited by onethreehill; 06-27-2008 at 03:16 AM.
System Specs: * i7 2700K @ 4.8 Ghz * Zalman CPNS9900-A LED * Asus Maximus IV Extreme -Z * 16 GB Corsair Dominator GT CMT16GX3M4X2133C9 * Sapphire HD7970 crossfire * Creative X-Fi Titanium Fatality Pro [PCI-E] * Corsair AX 1200W * WDC WD1002FAEX + WDC WD1002FAEX * Optiarc AD 5240S * Dell U3010 @ 2560 x 1600 [DVI-D] * Steelseries 7G * Logitech G9 * Steelseries SX * Coolermaster Stacker STC T01 * Logitech Z-5500 * Sennheiser HD598 * Windows 7 Ultimate x64 SP1*
SKYMTL did you try overclocking the hd4870? you're the only reviewer so far i think, to have proper cooling on this card (btw when checked which coolers fit, did u happen to check the temp difference compared to the arctic cooling?)/
Did I hear overclocking
http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...d.php?t=192411
The issue is not the core nor the memory. It is Catalyst.
I got to the max Catalyst allows RIGHT HERE
790 / 4400
I am waiting to hear back from ATI right now since they are supposed to send me an updated Catalyst driver to unlock speeds to 1000Mhz / 5400Mhz.
As for temp difference between the Thermalright and the AC...I have no idea.
Q6600 1.390v 3.8G Vid: 1.2125Thermalright Ultra-120 Extreme .DFI LanParty DK P35-T2RS. Crucial Ballistix Tracer 8500 2x1GB.. Seagate 410As Raid0 .. Sapphire HD4870 512mb & Cooling Thermalright HR-03 GT.. 19 LG 1950SQ .. Silverstone OP850 watt. Case Gigabyte Auro3D
Nah I'd say the 4870x2 will win, if it indeed is designed to act as an mcm, then it won't need xfire support in games and thus the x2 will win over all, not to mention there shouldn't be any micro-stuttering, so even if the x2 gets less fps it still would hold more value
My god. If 4870 X2 hits the market, I just might be on board. AMD did pretty good this round.
System: Core I7 920 @ 4200MHz 1.45vCORE 1.35VTT 1.2vIOH // EVGA x58 Classified E760 // 6GB Dominator GT 1866 @ 1688 6-7-6-18 1T 1.65V // Intel X25 80GB // PCP&C 750W Silencer
Cooling: Heatkiller 3.0 LT CPU block // 655 Pump // GTX360 Radiator
Sound: X-FI Titanium HD --> Marantz 2265 --> JBL 4311WXA's
Display: GTX480 // Sony GDM-FW900
Pretty good? The 4870 nearly matches the gtx 280, I'd say they did short of amazing, not to mention their yields are better and the r7xx can do ray tracing, so pretty good would actually be a major understatement, especially considering they were behind in the race by a considerable margin (especially with aa enabled)
GTX 280 can do ray tracing also.
Haha. Yeah, I guess I'm the king of understatement.
To possibly speculate though, are the rumors still going around about the 4870X2 using shared memory, instead of using two separate frame buffers?
If that is true, could we not possibly be looking at the end of some of the software/driver/micro-stuttering issues brought on in dual card setups?
System: Core I7 920 @ 4200MHz 1.45vCORE 1.35VTT 1.2vIOH // EVGA x58 Classified E760 // 6GB Dominator GT 1866 @ 1688 6-7-6-18 1T 1.65V // Intel X25 80GB // PCP&C 750W Silencer
Cooling: Heatkiller 3.0 LT CPU block // 655 Pump // GTX360 Radiator
Sound: X-FI Titanium HD --> Marantz 2265 --> JBL 4311WXA's
Display: GTX480 // Sony GDM-FW900
Due to the 4870x2 having a bridge chip that provies 160 GB/s of bandwidth, it is entirely possible, which likely means r700 will act as an mcm if that is the case (now I did not say will be an mcm, act as an mcm, probably too much concentrated heat if it was an mcm). But there's no guarantees yet, but due to the huge delay between the 4870 and 4870x2, likely something big is changed in the r700 from the r680
AliG - 160GB/sec? Sorry but you've been on the funny sauce again. It's a 48 lane PCIe 2.0 Bridge chip from either PLX or IDT (more than likely PLX). Thats 16 lanes for each GPU, and 16 lanes for the bus connection, which means at most, 32GB/sec bandwidth between GPU's.
Main Rig
Intel Core i7-2600K (SLB8W, E0 Stepping) @ 4.6Ghz (4.6x100), Corsair H80i AIO Cooler
MSI Z77A GD-65 Gaming (MS-7551), v25 BIOS
Kingston HyperX 16GB (2x8GB) PC3-19200 Kit (HX24C11BRK2/16-OC) @ 1.5v, 11-13-13-30 Timings (1:8 Ratio)
8GB MSI Radeon R9 390X (1080 Mhz Core, 6000 Mhz Memory)
NZXT H440 Case with NZXT Hue+ Installed
24" Dell U2412HM (1920x1200, e-IPS panel)
1 x 500GB Samsung 850 EVO (Boot & Install)
1 x 2Tb Hitachi 7K2000 in External Enclosure (Scratch Disk)
Entertainment Setup
Samsung Series 6 37" 1080p TV
Gigabyte GA-J1800N-D2H based media PC, Mini ITX Case, Blu-Ray Drive
Netgear ReadyNAS104 w/4x2TB Toshiba DTACA200's for 5.8TB Volume size
I refuse to participate in any debate with creationists because doing so would give them the "oxygen of respectability" that they want.
Creationists don't mind being beaten in an argument. What matters to them is that I give them recognition by bothering to argue with them in public.
Anyone hear about 4870's refusing to post? My new card bit the dust this morning during a reboot after working fine for the last 24 hours. There's another guy over in the general hardware forum who has the same problem on 2 different 4870's.
core i7 920, gigabyte EX58-UD5, 4870x2
DDC3.2 > PA120.3 > DD4870x2fc > Fuzion v1 > PA120.2 > EK Res
hey guys, UPS says my 4870's are out for delivery so i will be doing my own mini review of crossfire scaling and such and ill post it up sometime tommorrow nighttestbed will be the system in my sig
Bookmarks