@W1zzard
the Crysis-Scores are way to high, with what timedemo did you bench?
At 1600x1200@High 4xAA (inGame) 16xAF (Driver) i get roughly 17fps with a
8800GT 700/1000, E8400@3.6GHz, WinXP, gpu_bench
@W1zzard
the Crysis-Scores are way to high, with what timedemo did you bench?
At 1600x1200@High 4xAA (inGame) 16xAF (Driver) i get roughly 17fps with a
8800GT 700/1000, E8400@3.6GHz, WinXP, gpu_bench
It's just like that everywhere, you shouldn't be surprised at all.Originally Posted by T_M
Huh? So a regular member wouldn't get the same treatment?
Minding I have great respect for w1zzard and consider him a role-model, I'm sad this had to happen to TPU, they are great and I honestly hope nothing bad happens to them due to this.
Anyway, relatively to Crysis, I think RPGWiZaRD suggestion is one of the bests, since if you have a benchmark tool available to everyone, it will be much easier to compare results
Best regards everyone, and w1zzard, if you really gonna end up your life making graphic cards, info leaks are not going to be a problem*j/k*
Are we there yet?
confirmed .. all crysis results are at 1280x1024. for some reason the loading screen loads in the right resolution and then crysis switches back to 1280x1024 for the benchmark((
Use Crysis-Benchmark Tool 1.05confirmed .. all crysis results are at 1280x1024. for some reason the loading screen loads in the right resolution and then crysis switches back to 1280x1024 for the benchmark
If you came to me with the same scenario that W1zzard did this am I'd have done the same thing for you.
Huh? So a regular member wouldn't get the same treatment?
Maybe I worded my prior statement not quite correctly but you can ask around this forum and anytime someone PM's me for help I do all that I can to help them.
Crunch with us, the XS WCG team
The XS WCG team needs your support.
A good project with good goals.
Come join us,get that warm fuzzy feeling that you've done something good for mankind.
yes, they are too high for all vga that you have tested, so, probably, the relative position anyway is correct.
What driver you have used for benchmark? (if u can tell this...)
you can always force AF through driver, but it on ly works in Crysis if you don't use POM
r_TexMaxAnisotropy doesnt work in crysis?
as far as r_UsePom=0 it should work.
Are you 100% sure about this?
I believe Crysis has AF even while using POM...
Are we there yet?
:cry:
I had Width and Height swapped ...Code:cfg.Add(_T("r_Width = ")+api->GetParameter(_T("ResolutionX"))); cfg.Add(_T("r_Height = ")+api->GetParameter(_T("ResolutionY")));
99.9% sure
on my test-setup setting "r_Texture_Anisotropic_Level = 16"
and "r_TexMaxAnisotropy = 16" doesn't change the framerates.
Have to force it through the driver
Better leave it off at all, for the Benches
but i doubt crysis uses bi/trilinear filtering instead? so 0x AF seems to be incorrect?99.9% sure
on my test-setup setting "r_Texture_Anisotropic_Level = 16"
and "r_TexMaxAnisotropy = 16" doesn't change the framerates.
Have to force it through the driver
Better leave it off at all, for the Benches
===== Crysis =====
Average: 20.9 FPS
Minimum: 14.6 FPS
Maximum: 23.3 FPS
woot new results for 3870x2 1600x1200, 4x AA. looks correct now?
I may be confused about what I'm going to say, but I quite believe in that matter that AF is really =0, because POM is the technique to make 2D textures look like 3D, so no texture filtering needed. As for the long distance views (mountains, rocks vegetation etc), the command "e_view_dist_materials=2048" improves the distant object details, so it makes quite sense the absence of AF.
Did this make any sense or am I wrong about something?
Are we there yet?
Good to know we sorted through that
Looking forward to corrected review
Perkam
@W1zzard:
I am not sure if somebody already asked but could you explain how 9600 GT could possibly have 19.6 FPS in Crysis in 2048x1536 with 4xAA and 16xAF?
He explained, just read the tread.
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
i'm rebenching all cards now with the correct crysis settings and will post the numbers here when done for public scrutiny
oh
good to see you getting to the bottom of it
Do u use a newer driver?
AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W
Aha ok. So if he actually tested in 1280x1024 instead of 2048x1536 the scores for GTX 280 Amp would be:
2048x1536 4xAA = 20.71 FPS
1290x1080 4xAA = 28.27 FPS
That is if the original 49.7 FPS was indeed with 4xAA.
very good!i'm rebenching all cards now with the correct crysis settings and will post the numbers here when done for public scrutiny
That would be great W1zzard, but please don't get yourself in any more grief with Nvidia.i'm rebenching all cards now with the correct crysis settings and will post the numbers here when done for public scrutiny
We can all wait, this isn't life or death or anything like it.
Fun Box: Asus P8Z68-V GEN3++Corsair AX850++i5 2500k@4.5Ghz-1.272v++Corsair A50++2x8Gb Corsair Vengeance++MSI R7970 Lightning++Audigy2 Plat-EX++TBS 6280 DVB-T2 tuner++256Gb OCZ Vertex 4.500Gb Caviar Black.500Gb Seagate Barracuda++Sony AD7240s++Lian-Li PC-60++Linux Mint/Win 7++Asus P238Q
Work Box: Gigabyte H61MA-DV3++Corsair HX620++i5 3450@stock++2x8Gb Corsair Vengeance++120Gb OCZ Agility 3++Linux Mint
Quantum theory in a nutshell: It's so small we don't know where it is, it could be here, it could be there.
Just 'cos it's legal don't make it right.
you should have seen the original thread that got deleted. new numbers wont include nvidia's future products of course
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks