Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 36 of 36

Thread: Retail E8400 @ 4.8Ghz Sub 10s SPi 1M

  1. #26
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    249
    This chip is seems very promising. 4.8 Ghz with just water cooling for $200!? Incredible!

  2. #27
    Xtreme 3D Mark Team Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Juneau Alaska
    Posts
    7,607
    Quote Originally Posted by Zucker2k View Post
    I care what it's rated for; it means I'm not trying to kill my ram, I'm going to push to MY comfort levels. Or may be I should give it 2.6v - 3.0v for 1500mhz and kill it? I know the peculiarities of this ram with this board, so save me the arm-chair quarter-backing.

    who the hell cares what your comfort level is.
    that wasnt the point at all.

    what I said, was if your rams not doing 1:1, then its a MB issue. not Ram.
    the rating of the ram has nothing to do with it, but whats in the ram chips itself.

    man, how you got hardware this far, and dont know things like that just amazes me.
    you sound like you started overclocking last week...




    "The command and conquer model," said the EA CEO, "doesn't work. If you think you're going to buy a developer and put your name on the label... you're making a profound mistake."

  3. #28
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Nice cpu

    If you are having problems booting at 1:1 over 500FSB how about booting below 500 1:1 and then raising it with software within windows? Have you tried this?

    I think it may be your cpu, but until you do something like that you will not know for sure.

    Goodluck.

    Regards

    Andy
    Last edited by zakelwe; 01-21-2008 at 10:43 PM.

  4. #29
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by Kunaak View Post
    who the hell cares what your comfort level is.
    that wasnt the point at all.

    what I said, was if your rams not doing 1:1, then its a MB issue. not Ram.
    the rating of the ram has nothing to do with it, but whats in the ram chips itself.

    man, how you got hardware this far, and dont know things like that just amazes me.
    you sound like you started overclocking last week...
    Again, your post is full of assumptions. Now where do I even begin?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kunaak View Post
    what I said, was if your rams not doing 1:1, then its a MB issue.
    Go back to the original response to your post and see if that was what I said.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kunaak View Post
    the rating of the ram has nothing to do with it, but whats in the ram chips itself.
    You are assuming that if my ram can ran 1280 @ 5:6, then it should do 1280 @ 1:1. I said earlier that my ram displays this weird behaviour (based on testing with other rams). But you don't accept that explanation. You insists that I erred in my explanation, that it has to be the motherboard. Well, you can make that assumption from the comfort of your living room, I am dealing with the problem for real.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kunaak View Post
    man, how you got hardware this far, and dont know things like that just amazes me.
    you sound like you started overclocking last week...
    Another assumption, or plain rudeness, but that is fine. I don't claim to be as good as you or even a midrange overclocker. What I know however, is that I took my retail E8400 to 4.86 Ghz, cpu-z validated, on water. Period.
    Last edited by Zucker2k; 01-22-2008 at 05:36 AM.

  5. #30
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    30

    Cool

    Zuker2k is right. i ran into the same thing. memory wont run past 520-ish 1:1 well mine atleast. thats way too fast for most of todays chips. dont confuse frequency with this issue. the ram may run at a different divier at 1300mhz but wont keep up at 1:1 thats way too fast for the ram to keep up. like he said you have to have done it to understand. you just cant assume. same thing with cpu voltages depending on the divider you are running the chip may run at lover vcore but when running memory dividers in the current fsb strap cpu need more juice. speciall 1:1.....

    so Zuker2k thanks for the share great work. may i ask what your temps are like in the 4.8 - 5ghz range?

  6. #31
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    342
    Is good E8400 that can stay RS 4200 near 1,32 - 1,35 volt
    My Computer: CPU Intel i7 920@4 ghz 1.35 volt. MAINBOARD Asus P6t dlx. RAM CSX 2000. VIDEOCARD EVGA GTX 295 . H.DISK 2 x WD VelociRaptor 74 GB @ Win XP SP3 . POWER Zalmann 1000 Watt. CASE LIAN-Li A70 . INTEGRATED WATERCOOLING CPU Couplex + Rad V3 + MP655 + Vaschetta dual 5,25 . SK VIDEO EK + Rad V2 + MP655 + vaschetta 5,25

  7. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by nama View Post
    Zuker2k is right. i ran into the same thing. memory wont run past 520-ish 1:1 well mine atleast. thats way too fast for most of todays chips. dont confuse frequency with this issue. the ram may run at a different divier at 1300mhz but wont keep up at 1:1 thats way too fast for the ram to keep up. like he said you have to have done it to understand. you just cant assume. same thing with cpu voltages depending on the divider you are running the chip may run at lover vcore but when running memory dividers in the current fsb strap cpu need more juice. speciall 1:1.....

    so Zuker2k thanks for the share great work. may i ask what your temps are like in the 4.8 - 5ghz range?
    Never done 5ghz yet, board is not cooperating. I suspect my rams tho - they run very well for PC 6400 rated rams but they have limiits - especially since I don't want to give them more than 2.5v and fry them. My temps around 4.8ghz (with windows open (about 22C ambient) is around 34-38 idle. Can't say what full load is since I've never stressed the cpus at that speed.

  8. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    30

    Talking

    zucker2k, whats the highest primed you have got so far. am currently priming 4.25ghz(8.5x 500, 1.425vcore, nb=1.65, ram @ 1200 @ 5-5-5-5-3-35-6-3 @ 2.4).....

    i had cpu ppl at auto,fsbt at auto,sb auto and my system just reboot a few minutes past 8hrs small fft prime95. was advised to change ppl to 1.54 and fsbt to 1.5 am priming to see how that goes. 6 hrs so far. am using maximus formula with bios 907 and crucial ballistix tracers 1066. what would you recommend to tweak voltages so its more stable. am aiming for lower vcore but stable and aim higher frequencies. i want to stick with 500fsb or a little more. if too high my nb will need too much voltage and thats going to warm up the water cooling loop.

    my temps! @ 1.425vcore, 1.65nb, 1.18sb
    cpu & nb on a swiftech 220 water cooling loop.(4x sythe 1500rpm fans...2 each side of rad)
    cpu = 55-58 load
    cores=60,60(load) - (38 idle)
    nb = 38 to 40
    sb = 32 to 35



    first time i primed i set 1.63v northbridge and system blackscreened after 6hrs. upped to 1.65 and reboot after 8hrs. do you know how to tweak these fsbt and ppl and gtl settings?

    am loving the memory bandwidth tho. @ 500fsb and 1200mhz @ 5-5-5-5-3-35-6-3 am getting 9680mb/s in sandra

  9. #34
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by nama View Post
    zucker2k, whats the highest primed you have got so far. am currently priming 4.25ghz(8.5x 500, 1.425vcore, nb=1.65, ram @ 1200 @ 5-5-5-5-3-35-6-3 @ 2.4).....

    i had cpu ppl at auto,fsbt at auto,sb auto and my system just reboot a few minutes past 8hrs small fft prime95. was advised to change ppl to 1.54 and fsbt to 1.5 am priming to see how that goes. 6 hrs so far. am using maximus formula with bios 907 and crucial ballistix tracers 1066. what would you recommend to tweak voltages so its more stable. am aiming for lower vcore but stable and aim higher frequencies. i want to stick with 500fsb or a little more. if too high my nb will need too much voltage and thats going to warm up the water cooling loop.

    my temps! @ 1.425vcore, 1.65nb, 1.18sb
    cpu & nb on a swiftech 220 water cooling loop.(4x sythe 1500rpm fans...2 each side of rad)
    cpu = 55-58 load
    cores=60,60(load) - (38 idle)
    nb = 38 to 40
    sb = 32 to 35



    first time i primed i set 1.63v northbridge and system blackscreened after 6hrs. upped to 1.65 and reboot after 8hrs. do you know how to tweak these fsbt and ppl and gtl settings?

    am loving the memory bandwidth tho. @ 500fsb and 1200mhz @ 5-5-5-5-3-35-6-3 am getting 9680mb/s in sandra
    Looks like you're on your way there buddy From my own experience, cpupll is key to avoiding problems on maximus formula and my E8400. My cpupll voltage is set to 1.50v, yes 1.50v for all my overclocks including the 4.9Ghz overclock.

    The only things I can suggest is to

    1. loosen your timings a little bit to eliminate rams as a problem.
    2. set nb to 1.67v
    3. set sb to 1.100v
    4. Set fsbt to 1.54v.
    5. set both cpu/nb gtl volts to auto.
    6. enable loadline calibration
    7. set sb 1.5v to 1.70v

    Hope this helps.

  10. #35
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    30

    Smile

    i tested the ram and it passed prime. its when i upped the cpu multiplier that she acted up but those settings i posted passed 10hrs small ffts. will aim higher today and when i find a sweet spot(high clock vs temps) i will prime 24hrs. but thats... if i loosen timings i get reboots. they want to be tightened to work at this speed.

  11. #36
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by nama View Post
    i tested the ram and it passed prime. its when i upped the cpu multiplier that she acted up but those settings i posted passed 10hrs small ffts. will aim higher today and when i find a sweet spot(high clock vs temps) i will prime 24hrs. but thats... if i loosen timings i get reboots. they want to be tightened to work at this speed.
    Thought as much. These new cpus are doing faster cycle times... rams have to keep pace.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •