Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast
Results 151 to 175 of 196

Thread: Phenom and 3DMark

  1. #151
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    I can bench 05 tonight with following setup:
    Yorkfield 333x9 + X38 + DDR2 + 2900Pro 860/980
    Operating system is Vista 32-bit.

    Let's see what the score will be...
    You are as good as your samples are!

  2. #152
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    so cal
    Posts
    153
    I would be interested in seeing yorkfield vs phenom folding SMP for a half hour each both at stock settings but then again this would be the wrong section.
    cant blame a guy for asking

  3. #153
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    1,837
    Really interresting thread, i'm really happy for the good results from the phenom, 2005 is so cpu dependant. 3DM2005 is a lot more cpu dependant than new games as Crysis with quality setting settings just under 60Fps.

    It would be interresting to see some numbers under XP too, particulary 3DM2001

    Just any question : Phenom should have 6Mo L3 and 4X1Mo L2 in 2008 ?


    Thanks for the numbers macci, i hope a lot since you reappeared


    Edit : Ok Vista Roxx
    Last edited by misteroadster; 12-14-2007 at 05:44 AM.
    8Days/8Wr
    *OverClocking-Masters.com 3D Team

    Cooling Caskad'Chill : concept by mister, made by Skirms&Pgeo.

    1700+ Cpu-Z SS 3227Mhz/SD 3700 Cpu-Z SS 3704Mhz/E6600 Cpu-Z SS 5104Mhz

    E6600 Results : 10.09s Pi 1M / 714 CpuMark / 3DM2001 : 68061 7900GT air / 76280 7950 Gx2 stock cooling

  4. #154
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Quote Originally Posted by macci View Post
    George,

    don't downclock anything or switch to DDR2 - thanks for the ref. score! now I have a new target again (which is not too far either)

    I think my GT3 is too low for the clocks (I remember it stutters in the beginning of GT3). Let me try WinXP. I think I can get it to over 20.5k too.

    in any case its still a VERY close match.

    I'll work on that 06 number during the weekend.

    speaking of latest technology: I think you should try with Vista (for both 05 / 06)
    You filthy pron macci......
    You didn't tell me that 2k5 on Windows VISTA shines!.....AHA!.....THAT'S why you have benched it on VISTA right?......

    I ALSO have stutters in the beginning of GT3 with XP OR VISTA....You should fix the drivers a bit I think.....


    With my previus setting on rams, I got 20694 and with more tight settings, I got the below......
    ALSO my VGA rams are LOWER than yours....

    Take a look at the Performance Level you INTEL guys.....








    Quote Originally Posted by BeardyMan View Post
    The point is that you have the possibility to compare fair yet you prefer to do it otherwise. You wanne know who is faster clock per clock in this bench yet you use a factor that influence GT1 and GT3 for sure.
    Memory Bandwidth influence a LOT GT1 and a bit GT2.....
    Now tell me this..... Isn't Phenom supposed to have INTERNAL MEMORY CONTROLLER that wipes out EVERY Intel rig?......Yes or No?.....
    This is GT1 of the 2k5....
    Now do you want to compare ALL 3Ds to see how Phenon is NOT doing that well at all?.....


    Quote Originally Posted by massman View Post
    You're right if one would compare what cpu is better for extreme benching purpose ... but then, you would choose Intel just because you can clock it at 5,8G using ln² .

    To find out what cpu is better clock per clock, you need to use the same hardware/software .
    SOFTWARE used the SAME now......Windows Vista and it seems that it performs BETTER as for 2k5.....

    SO we will NOW "avoid" the "SOFTWARE influence" since BOTH benchies where done on VISTA and we keep on, right?....

    Hardware: Look my above answer to BeardyMan....

    We are testing at the EXACT SAME FREQUENCY/bench/software and EACH system is MAXED out with whatever methods the manufacturer provide us....


    Quote Originally Posted by dpa View Post
    anyways, George CAN run the setup at 4.7Ghz on air, while macci is stuck at 3Ghz on air.. enough said at xs.org?


    Quote Originally Posted by KTE View Post
    Again that 2750Mhz George compared to Badnizze had 458MHz FSB. That's insane FSB for quads. Try ~333MHz and you have a proper comparison.
    "Insane fsb for QUADS" is the 500MHz+ M8....This 428 is peanuts....

    .
    Last edited by hipro5; 12-14-2007 at 05:16 AM.
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  5. #155
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Finland
    Posts
    1,707
    hipro you cheater.. no wonder your scores are higher because your GPU clock is 863 MHz instead of 860 MHz
    Favourite game: 3DMark
    Work: Muropaketti.com - Finnish hardware site
    Views and opinions about IT industry: Twitter: sampsa_kurri

  6. #156
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Quote Originally Posted by Sampsa View Post
    hipro you cheater.. no wonder your scores are higher because your GPU clock is 863 MHz instead of 860 MHz
    ....and?..... what frequency is that?...
    Plus Riva Tuner can't take it at 860 sharp....it puts it on 863....
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  7. #157
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    good job hipro

    what's the vMCH on the board for that PL?
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  8. #158
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,014
    Ok i will do it myself next week on my QX9650, and teamgroup DDR2.
    Omg a stupid run on DDR2 seems to be mission impossible

  9. #159
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22 View Post
    good job hipro

    what's the vMCH on the board for that PL?
    I used 1.95VMCH dinos....
    Also
    - a secret - Strap 200

    Quote Originally Posted by BeardyMan View Post
    Ok i will do it myself next week on my QX9650, and teamgroup DDR2.
    Omg a stupid run on DDR2 seems to be mission impossible
    I don't own a DDR2 mobo any more M8......What can I do?.....Bench with ABIT AW9D MAX and X6800?.....
    I'll borrow an ASUS Blitz Formula for you....
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  10. #160
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    I don't care who wins this is fun to watch. I think Macci can tweak a fair bit more yet but i get the feeling Hipro has more in hand hardware wise.

    It's nice to see Macci back benching again Looking forward to results with LN2.

    Regards

    Andy

  11. #161
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    17,242
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5 View Post
    I used 1.95VMCH dinos....
    Also
    - a secret - Strap 200

    that explains low PL value besides monsterous voltages on MCH

    what cooling do you have on MCH
    looks like i'll have to crack open my nautilus 500 with chipset cooler block from corsair to really push the damn RAM and straps

    buying one of OPBs boards :p for super fast CDT ownage hahahah j/k
    really need a decent board for RAM clocking and ddr3 GB isn't cutting it atm
    bios needs a lot of work on them
    Team.AU
    Got tube?
    GIGABYTE Australia
    Need a GIGABYTE bios or support?



  12. #162
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    590
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5 View Post
    [B]

    "Insane fsb for QUADS" is the 500MHz+ M8....This 428 is peanuts....

    .
    yep - P5k does 480 FSB with quad at 1.4v vMCH & 1.7v PLL

  13. #163
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Quote Originally Posted by dinos22 View Post
    what cooling do you have on MCH
    I have a cooper Enzotech heatsink with a DELTA 4x4cm 10000rpms on it.....
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  14. #164
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    Quote Originally Posted by hipro5 View Post
    Memory Bandwidth influence a LOT GT1 and a bit GT2.....
    Now tell me this..... Isn't Phenom supposed to have INTERNAL MEMORY CONTROLLER that wipes out EVERY Intel rig?......Yes or No?.....
    This is GT1 of the 2k5....
    Now do you want to compare ALL 3Ds to see how Phenon is NOT doing that well at all?.....


    SOFTWARE used the SAME now......Windows Vista and it seems that it performs BETTER as for 2k5.....

    SO we will NOW "avoid" the "SOFTWARE influence" since BOTH benchies where done on VISTA and we keep on, right?....

    Hardware: Look my above answer to BeardyMan....

    We are testing at the EXACT SAME FREQUENCY/bench/software and EACH system is MAXED out with whatever methods the manufacturer provide us....


    You sick bastard . PL=4 is just TOO fast

    Anyway, I take your point, going as fast as you can with the hardware that the manuf supports does seem to make more sense

    Now, I'm hoping that Macci is going to pass this again, just to keep this battle going. You know ... I have a flashback to 2003
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  15. #165
    k|ngp|n/Sham my brothers
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    Athens---Hellas
    Posts
    5,693
    Quote Originally Posted by massman View Post
    You know ... I have a flashback to 2003
    INTEL PWA FOR EVER

    Dr. Who my arss...

    .........



  16. #166
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Falkenberg, Sweden
    Posts
    365
    Hipro: 4,5k @ 2750 is FAST, Don´t think i can match that...ever, But I will try My DFi board, does not suffer from the Low NB clock bug. As my older Gigabyte did\does.

    Regarding the FSB thing, K8 does not scale with HTT\FSB I have not done testing with K10, but i think it´s safe to say that running high HTT does not give much in terms of preformance on K10 either. But it would be nice to see what a york does @ 3Ghz with 333FSb for reference. Could someone run 2,4ghz on a York to? Would be nice to see how it scales with Mhz aswell! No one have tested york @ low mhz, right?
    AMD
    955BE, 720BE & Athlon II 250
    Gigabyte 790FXT-UD5P F5 Bios
    Crucial Value 2*1Gb D9 JNM
    XFX 4770
    Seventeam 650w

  17. #167
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    4,714
    Quote Originally Posted by BadNizze View Post
    No one have tested york @ low mhz, right?
    I'm keeping track of as many 45nm 1M results as possible. This is 1M vs MHz, not useful here, but I have one result with very low clock freq, which shows that it scales pretty good.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Clipboard02.png 
Views:	417 
Size:	37.1 KB 
ID:	68717  
    Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.

  18. #168
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    368
    Macci will beat it

  19. #169
    Nice Hardware!!!
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Finland/Tampere
    Posts
    1,846
    Here is totally stock result with yorkfield. Over 20K, but not much. (This is my 24/7 machine, so there is a lot of crap in background)

    QX9650 9x333
    Maximus Formula
    2900Pro 863/999
    2GB ram/ DDR2 1005 / 4-4-4-6
    "strap" 266 (-->200 wasn't stable because NB was too hot.)
    Performance level= 4
    Vista 32-bit.
    Catalyst 7.10 /7.11 doesn't work for some reason.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	05 stock.jpg 
Views:	420 
Size:	174.7 KB 
ID:	68721
    You are as good as your samples are!

  20. #170
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Posts
    368
    @ SF3D

    Nice!
    Can you show us some 3DMARK06 with those stock settings?

    []'s
    Simps

  21. #171
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Ayia Napa, Cyprus
    Posts
    1,354
    nice one guys, come on Hipro play nice

    good to see Macci benching ti is fun to watch

    good to see ipc is close
    Seasonic Prime TX-850 Platinum | MSI X570 MEG Unify | Ryzen 5 5800X 2048SUS, TechN AM4 1/2" ID
    32GB Viper Steel 4400, EK Monarch @3733/1866, 1.64v - 13-14-14-14-28-42-224-16-1T-56-0-0
    WD SN850 1TB | Zotac Twin Edge 3070 @2055/1905, Alphacool Eisblock
    2 x Aquacomputer D5 | Eisbecher Helix 250
    EK-CoolStream XE 360 | Thermochill PA120.3 | 6 x Arctic P12

  22. #172
    Banned
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Posts
    1,014
    Quote Originally Posted by SF3D View Post
    Here is totally stock result with yorkfield. Over 20K, but not much. (This is my 24/7 machine, so there is a lot of crap in background)

    QX9650 9x333
    Maximus Formula
    2900Pro 863/999
    2GB ram/ DDR2 1005 / 4-4-4-6
    "strap" 266 (-->200 wasn't stable because NB was too hot.)
    Performance level= 4
    Vista 32-bit.
    Catalyst 7.10 /7.11 doesn't work for some reason.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	05 stock.jpg 
Views:	420 
Size:	174.7 KB 
ID:	68721
    as i thought so, the reason why hipro doesnt show DDR2 cause he knows that phenom with DDR beats teh crap out of yorkfield with DDR2 and for sure when macci is roling the dices , thx for the info man

  23. #173
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Oslo, Norway
    Posts
    1,218
    Quote Originally Posted by BeardyMan View Post
    as i thought so, the reason why hipro doesnt show DDR2 cause he knows that phenom with DDR beats teh crap out of yorkfield with DDR2 and for sure when macci is roling the dices , thx for the info man
    why do you really need ddr2 for...?? ddr3 is the new thing now, just let DDR2 go, okey?

  24. #174
    ODOC
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Copenhagen - Denmark
    Posts
    2,189
    Really impressive there George.

    Keep pushing it.

  25. #175
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Posts
    1,755
    Quote Originally Posted by dpa View Post
    why do you really need ddr2 for...?? ddr3 is the new thing now, just let DDR2 go, okey?
    DDR2 is still what 99% will buy today.

Page 7 of 8 FirstFirst ... 45678 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •