Asus P5b Deluxe
Core 2 Extreme 6700 (kentsfield) 1,33v
2gb Gskill pc6400 GA c3
Mach II cooling
http://82.173.172.10/Rol-Co/1m4g.png
http://rol-co.nl/images/langer.jpg
Asus P5b Deluxe
Core 2 Extreme 6700 (kentsfield) 1,33v
2gb Gskill pc6400 GA c3
Mach II cooling
http://82.173.172.10/Rol-Co/1m4g.png
http://rol-co.nl/images/langer.jpg
I see. It's an engineering sample. Not really indicative of actual retail chips.Originally Posted by Drag
But impressive.
But can you hold that with sustained load, or just a quick superpi 1m?
QX6700, Asus P5WDH, 2GB TeamXtreme D9GMH, Watercooled (PA120.3 rad, 1/2", Swiftec 655 pump)
3.5GHz - 48degC idle and 65degC load after 8 hours prime
Currently now priming small 8K fft @ 2.66 GHz with 1.14 vcore under load.
Originally Posted by loafer87gt
I just can not believe, that f***n nv4disp.dll BSOD
is from ti4200 prehistorical eon!!!!!
try google>nv4disp.dll fix etc....
VIA used to have some fix for that problem, it did work on some nonVIA based mobos.
ti4200, 5900,6600...and even 8800 have same problem?
Check nV+VIA forums for that fix.
Advice, try ti use D3D instead OGL, it is even more faster in MAX7,8,9.
regards!
P5B DLX
Scythe Infinity + SanAce 260CFM
Room Temp->10C
Bios set -> 1.63v
Windows idle-> 1.53v
load-> 1.45v
Mojo
Family
Biostar TP55 XE - Core i7 860(ES) @ 4.2ghz - CNPS10X Extreme - G.SKILL 1600 - Galaxy GTX275 - Velociraptor 300GB x 2 - Zippy TypeR 600w
Criminal
Biostar Tpower X58A - 920~Gulf - G.SKILL2000CL8 - GTX580 - Intel 520 120GB - Antec HCP 1200w
Biostar TP67XE/TZ77XE4 2500k~3770K - G.SKILL 2800 - GTX480 - OCZ Vertex2 50GB - Corsair AX1200
Biostar Tpower X79 i7 3820 ~ E5 2680 - G.SKILL 2400C11 - GTX560Ti - Intel 520 120GB - AX1200i
Kids
P4GD1 - Pentium M 780 - XMS Xpert400 - GTX460 - Raptor 36GB - Aopen 560w
Hi, What is the real vcore for this frequency ? and is it stable or not ?Originally Posted by nicepun
3350 mhz Quad prime @ 1.4v on a STORM.
3970 mhz on 1m/wprime 32m @ 1.55v on a STORM.
3910 mhz wprime 1024m
I will more testing but so far 1.55vcore for 320x11 (3.5Ghz) stable as hell. I will measure real vcore and let you know.Originally Posted by pepinorang
"You'll find happiness once you accept the inevitable or at least you won't be too pissed off" -- Me
[SIGPIC][/SIGPIC]
vcore was 1.625v
My Custom Pressure/Temperature Charts for Various Refrigerants
QX6700 @ 3900 | EVGA 680i |2 GB Corsair 8500 Dominator | 7800 GT SLi | Silverstone 1KW | Seagate 7200.9 Barracuda RAID 0 + Hitachi Deskstar 2TB RAID 0 | SS Phase w/ Cryostar Evap | MIPS Full Motherboard cooling
My Fake Quad Core is better than your real Quad Core! **cough**Barcelona**cough**
Lian Li Cube Case with Phase and Water DONE!!
I just got done building my rig a few hours ago and am still messing around, but so far, 3.6GHZ, 1.4 vcore. Temps from 30ish to 48ish so far but have not run anything heavy other than 4 instances of P95 for about 30 minutes, and 500% memtests. This is definitely foreign territory for me because that last intel board I had was the IC7-Max3. Also, when I went for 3.7, I don't know if it was ram, fsb, may both, but it would BSOD before Vista completed loading. PWM temps also shoot up pretty fast after 3.6/1.4vcore, so I think I'll hang around this OC with the CPU and concentrate on RAM now.
This bios on this IN9 is a little scary!
By the way, running 4 sticks of:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16820227159
Think I'll get much more from it?
Abit IN9 - Kentsfield QX6700 @3520
1.5 vcore watercooled D-Tek Fuzion/PA-160/MCR120/2x MCP655
2x2GB G-Skill (1080Mhz) 5-5-5-15@2.2vdimm
2x XFX 8800GTS 648/999
2x 74GB Sata Raptor Raid0
2x 320GB Sata WD
X-FI Elite Pro
Lian Li V2100B
Dell 2405FPW
PP&C Silencer 750
Propably, if you get rid of this Abit (and any Abit) board and buy something else, like Evga, Asus, Gigabyte, DFI, etc.Originally Posted by Slammin
Have a look here![]()
Vapochill LS results.
Just the CPU dependant benchmarks.
Pifast - hwbot comparison
PCMark05 - hwbot comparison
wPrime 32M - hwbot comparison
wPrime 1024M - hwbot comparison
Also, 3DMark06
![]()
Originally Posted by Chosen.
Hmm,
I gues the latest bios must have taken care of it because I am 100% certain, at least by every measure (Everest, benchmarks, etc.) I can make that all cores are clocking together.
I never even booted into an OS with the shipping bios, but I did save it to floppy. If I ever get bored, I may load it just to play, but I doubt I get that bored anytime soon!
Edit:
I just checked with RMClock and sure enough, two cores with multi 11, and two with multi 10! I stand corrected! I hope abit fixes this!
Last edited by Slammin; 03-08-2007 at 12:54 PM.
Abit IN9 - Kentsfield QX6700 @3520
1.5 vcore watercooled D-Tek Fuzion/PA-160/MCR120/2x MCP655
2x2GB G-Skill (1080Mhz) 5-5-5-15@2.2vdimm
2x XFX 8800GTS 648/999
2x 74GB Sata Raptor Raid0
2x 320GB Sata WD
X-FI Elite Pro
Lian Li V2100B
Dell 2405FPW
PP&C Silencer 750
qx6700 on xbx2 with latest bios..
266x11 = 3ghz, all voltages at default.. stable dual orthos, gaming, 3d benchies, without problem.
266x12 = 3.2ghz, all voltages at default.. unstable orthos for core 3 n 4, but stable gaming, 3d benchies..
will try higher when i got time to play with this new processor![]()
Intel Core i7 870,
MSI P55 GD65,
4x 2048mb DDR3 1600 Corsair Dominator,
Sapphire 5870,
Corsair HX850W,
2x 640GB WD sata II,
1x 1TB WD Sata III,
easy'r way![]()
run s-pi 1m and set affinity to core 1 only and look at the result
run s-pi 1m second time and set affinity to core 4 and look at the result.
you be shokked![]()
Originally Posted by Rol-Co
er.. that's exactly what my screenshot is showing: one Spi1M @core1 and one @core3, 3 whole seconds difference, 12x300 from BIOS, 2 cores stuck at 10x300.
See My Sig. I'm sure others can do better, But I'm stuck with slow ram, So I'll make do until I can replace It.![]()
PC1: QX6700 _B1(ES) cpu @ 2.98GHz, Asus P5K Deluxe(812 Bios) w/one GTX295 card...
PC1(Replacement): i5 750 cpu @ 2.66GHz, Asus P7P55D Pro[Under Construction]
Vcore for the OC in my sig is 1.60 on Striker
Im sure i can go much higher but I I am waiting for a new phase unit before I go higher..
http://valid.x86-secret.com/show_oc?id=169633
Last edited by sdumper; 03-08-2007 at 06:29 PM.
Never empower an idiot with a response....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Troll_%28Internet%29
Seller/Buyer Reputation:
Heatware: http://www.heatware.com/eval.php?id=50905
Ebay: {Family Account} Kasyg3 http://myworld.ebay.com/kasyg3/
Ebay: {My personal Account} Sdumper http://myworld.ebay.com/sdumper/
iTrader: http://www.blazingpc.com/forum/itrader.php?u=28
You can also use the -core parameter in the shortcuts for the latest cpu-z to see what individual cores are set at. RMClock is easier though.er.. that's exactly what my screenshot is showing: one Spi1M @core1 and one @core3, 3 whole seconds difference, 12x300 from BIOS, 2 cores stuck at 10x300.
A fix to this is use CrystalCPUID. Example I have my multiplier set to 12x275 right now. If I run CrystalCPUID, go through each core and from functions select 'Intel Enhanced Speedstep Control' one of them shows up with a multiplier of 6. If I then change that to 12, all cores are then overclocked evenly.
I tested this with cinebench and my rendertime dropped from 15 seconds down to 12 seconds, so it does work.
RLM
QX9650@4.5ghz Vapochill LS
E8600 (Boxed)
Rampage Extreme
OCZ Gold DDR3 (8500) 1680 7-6-6-20-2T
4870x2 Vmodded + Ek Nickel
9800GX2 Vmod + EK H20 (Stored)
Thermaltake TP 1000W
Lian Li P007 Case
i played with 3dmax this morning and yes, the nv driver problem appeared!![]()
Intel Core i7 870,
MSI P55 GD65,
4x 2048mb DDR3 1600 Corsair Dominator,
Sapphire 5870,
Corsair HX850W,
2x 640GB WD sata II,
1x 1TB WD Sata III,
Bookmarks