Kentsfield K6700es B1
ASUS P5W64 WS Pro , all stock, no mod.
Team DDR2_1000 1G*2 Victor ED
Zippy PSL-6701p
Raptor 150G
FX5700 128m PCI
setting:
vcore=1.45v
vmch=1.8v
vfsb=1.2v
vdimm=2.4v
multi=9x
365*9=3285mhz pi_1m=13.875sec , I really cannot believe that even it's work out by my own hands.
Last edited by VictorWang; 09-12-2006 at 12:29 AM.
I'll tell u guys what happend tomorrow
Hmmm, i think the record is like 9seconds ? lol but never the less that is a great result, my X6800 does the 1M one second longer than your socre. but your FSB is much higher than mine, i just bumped the Multiplier to 13.
Thats a pretty nice result for such low clocks.
so jack it up with LN2 and let's see this at 5GHz and 8.x sec run
so how's you do it
I think you haven't notice how fast it is, ONLY 3289mhz pi_1m = 13.875secOriginally Posted by Artmic
13.875sec need almost 3.65G to achieve in common.
you will know it by tomorrowso jack it up with LN2 and let's see this at 5GHz and 8.x sec run
so how's you do it
Almost seems like PI is trying to use more than one core?!I think you haven't notice how fast it is, ONLY 3289mhz pi_1m = 13.875sec
13.875sec need almost 3.65G to achieve in common.
That is an excellent time for such low clocks indeed!
Tell us How :P
you can trust me it's a real clean run with optimized ram_timings and OS, but not by PS
well for me it is "tomorrow" officially heheheh 1.22am in Sydney as i type sooooooooo i'm ready to learn from the masteryou will know it by tomorrow
please don't tell me it's a bug of some sort
do another one with different RAM and CPU speed.....i want to see if this is repeatable
you able to run 32M with maxmem at 600?.....i was testing ~250 maxmem recently and it would just freeze SPI in 32M runs....hmm
how are 32M runs with this tweak or whatever you figured out
Last edited by dinos22; 09-11-2006 at 07:26 AM.
i think it's a bug...
SuperPI isn't an multi thread soft...
French Overclockers roxxxxxx
OCM Team addict
Maybe that "Multiplexing" thing?
Think it's a bug too. The 2x4Mo cache is not enough to explain the difference of 400Mhz for the same score ... or you've found the ultimate optimization. I want to learn more about it !!
CM : ASUS P5B Delux WiFI AP (soon P5B-E cause P5B's dead)
Proc : Intel C2Duo E6600@3600Mhz 1.42v real WaterCooling by Skirm's Chill 24/24
CG : ASUS 8800GTX@660/1060 Air Cooling (max bench)
CSon : Creative Labs Sound Blaster Audigy LS
Enc. : Creative Itrigue 5600
Mem : 2x1Go CellShock PC8000 (max 621 5-5-5-15@2.45v)
WC : Waterchiller made by skirms, WB Apogee
Ecran : 19" LCD Hyundai Q90U
Boitier: Antec Super Lanboy (only for DD's, cdrom etc etc ...)
Alim : Antec True550 EPS12V 550W (soon Hiper 730W)
DD : 2xSeagate Barracuda SATA 80Go 7200rpm 8mo RAID 1
DVD : LG
Graveur: LG 52-24-52
Système: XP Pro SP2
BENCH :
Score 3DMark2006 : 12568 pts 660/1060 cpu 3800Mhz LDR ~15°
Score 3DMark2005 : 20463 pts 660/1060 cpu 3800Mhz LDR ~15°
Score 3DMark2001 : 65860 pts 660/1060 cpu 3800Mhz LDR ~15°
Score Aquamark : 204196 pts 660/1060 cpu 3800Mhz LDR ~15°
Score Cpumark : 586 pts at 4179Mhz 1.62v real
SuperPi 1M : 12.266s at 4114 1.62v real
ok man , you beat me
as I tried so many time, it's a BUG when K6700 meet P5W64
You can see the following 2 pics , then you will know what's happed
maybe that's why ASUS 975x+6800 cannot run at 400fsb+ on normal Air cooling
setting:
vcore=1.45v
vmch=1.8v
vfsb=1.2v
vdimm=2.4v
multi=10x
1. K6700 @ 365*10 1095 4-4-3-1 pi_1m
2. X6800 @ 365*10 1095 4-4-3-1 pi_1m
Last edited by VictorWang; 09-11-2006 at 07:49 AM.
multi drops to 9x instead of 6x hehehehehe
no , I set 9x in bios, but... sometime it's running slower than normal, but sometime is running extremely fast
So I gave you the "FAST" result and compare with performance of deafult 10x
oh the other way round ROFLno , I set 9x in bios, but... sometime it's running slower than normal, but sometime is running extremely fast
So I gave you the "FAST" result and compare with performance of deafult 10x
nice one anyway you were
I've read there's some errors with application for multithreading on Kentsfield.
Is it right? And GOOD overclock for air..
Through Test required
It is because, there are two dies on a package. the changing multplyer is only effected on a die, the other die is still running at 10x.no , I set 9x in bios, but... sometime it's running slower than normal, but sometime is running extremely fast
So I gave you the "FAST" result and compare with performance of deafult 10x
You can ask manufacture to correct the BIOS.
I got three results at continuouse three runs.
And it is because....
Bios still can not handle the cahanging of the multiplyer on die No.2(on this case CPU2,3, still run at 9x266)
Last edited by tanghiro; 09-11-2006 at 08:07 PM.
haha, Asus' great BUG, and great you found the reason
weird bug hehehaha, Asus' great BUG, and great you found the reason
---
VictroWang, are there any known wmods for this wonderfull mobo?
Can you publish or send some high-res pics to sb like shamino to figure out some mods?
OC-Lab.si!!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks