65nm presler 950es oc test on rad watercooling, 4.9G done !

[gloatlizard]

victor great job, a very interesting topic my friend

[kappa2001]

now i'm interested

get on to game benchmarks

good job :thumbsup:

[[cTx]Philosophy]

I wanna see some 3d action
Whats ur 24\7 clocks looking @?
Or are you still figuring it out?

[PcCI2iminal]

nice chip u got there and great job
Intel @ 65nm is the way to go

and im with the others 3dbenchs with norton runnin,need some real dual core power

[iboomalot]

I'll wait for benches before saying that

going off the slight improvements by these benches I don't think AMD has much to worry about.

http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051010/

Barring a miracle, the new Presler chips would need to have some new feature not listed on the roadmap to really make them outshine the existing Smithfield and Athlon 64 X2 chips. The smaller process might allow them to run slightly cooler, and we might even see 4.0GHz chips at some point, but that's about the only changes

would be nice to see Intel get over that 4ghz hump they have been avoiding for awhile

[Piotrsama]

3 cores?

Presler is dual core...

run PCMARK!!! with three cores, it should ace that.

Same, 2 cores.


Where did you get the 3 cores stuff from?

[VictorWang]

Great stuff victor...these chips look strong.

65nm is really good !

[VictorWang]

victor great job, a very interesting topic my friend

aha~~~~~you can hit over 7.5Ghz with 65nm core soon , my friend

[don_vercetti]

Presler is dual core...



Same, 2 cores.


Where did you get the 3 cores stuff from?

From afireinside......sorry. Also, if you look in the second picture of the first post, he has run 3 instances of SuperPI. In retrospect, it was probably demonstrating that it had HT. My bad.

[Xassius]

Why not lower that divider to 1:1 for some 3-2-2-1 timing action!

[LexDiamonds]

Nice clocks to be sure...

AMD is in no real trouble..

It makes me smile to see Opties@3ghz just spanking a 4.6Ghz next genP4 core at Super Pi. Granted SPi isnt the be all end all, but its a good indication of general performance.

[VictorWang]

Why not lower that divider to 1:1 for some 3-2-2-1 timing action!

I've test for 3-2-2-4 333mhz vs 5-3-3-8 500mhz, seems the latter runs faster

[IluvIntel]

VictorWang, what bios version are you using on P5WD2 ?

[VictorWang]

VictorWang, what bios version are you using on P5WD2 ?

0606

[RoyaL]

going off the slight improvements by these benches I don't think AMD has much to worry about.

http://www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20051010/

well I think AMD is in big trouble.
obviously with this new 0,065 chips Intel cpus will go even higher
going over 7.5ghz@1M getting 16" or 15" who knows
FX is stucked at 21" .. that's a shame

Victor:put some dry ice on that baby!

[VictorWang]

well I think AMD is in big trouble.
obviously with this new 0,065 chips Intel cpus will go even higher
going over 7.5ghz@1M getting 16" or 15" who knows
FX is stucked at 21" .. that's a shame

Victor:put some dry ice on that baby!

I think... 65nm single core can hit over 8.5Ghz for 1m benching

[perry_78]

I think... 65nm single core can hit over 8.5Ghz for 1m benching

If that would indeed be the case I think I better fire up them old DI containers and start saving

[Master_G]

they run colder than the prescott ?
nice stuff

If they didnt i think Intel should pretty much give up and go home tbh lol.
What waterblock is being used?
Nice results, should be interesting in 06, might have to start paying attention to intel again!

G

[VictorWang]

If that would indeed be the case I think I better fire up them old DI containers and start saving

I thinks LN2 is much preffered

[VictorWang]

If they didnt i think Intel should pretty much give up and go home tbh lol.
What waterblock is being used?
Nice results, should be interesting in 06, might have to start paying attention to intel again!

G

very common waterblock with 12*12cm rad and 1225 1700rpm fan
room temp = 22c

[shuRe]

thank god your using water with that, i dont even want to think about the temps on air.

IMO AMD arnt in any real trouble, im willing to bet money on it

[crotale]

I thought they didn't work on 955X boards. Very interesting!

[iboomalot]

8.5 ghz i doubt thats going to happen even on LN2

Yes Intel on LN2 does a great superpi run but I use mine to game with and encode DVDs


Intel won't be winning much on the gaming front until a better design of the CPU happens.

PCMark05 Users Top 10


1. 8513 DINOS-MIKE GREECE -- AMD

2. 8456 Maverick -- AMD

3. 8165 by D. Karetsos) - Intel

4. 7928 Skywaver -- AMD

5. 7800 hyperasus - Intel

6. 7689 eva2000 -- AMD

7. 7678 *XtremeSystems 3D Team* -- AMD

8. 7653 TuKo - AMD

9. 7614 BigStan -- Intel

10. 7465 ElDuderino -- AMD


PCMark04 Users Top 10

1. 10089 OPB Taiwan -- AMD

2. 9518 Sucka -- AMD

3. 9364 Sampsa & Kamu – AMD

4. 9326 FUGGER -- Intel

5. 9298 FROG -- AMD

6. 9158 maverik -- AMD

7. 9123 Project Octane -- AMD

8. 9078 by D. Karetsos) - Intel

9. 8878 Fletch -- AMD

10. 8821 Iboomalot XS -- AMD


3DMark05 Users Top 20

ALL --AMD

3DMark03 Users Top 20

ALL -- AMD


Intel a threath hummm don't think so

atleast they are improving there products competition is good

[The Stilt]

I think... 65nm single core can hit over 8.5Ghz for 1m benching

You might be able to get a Cedar Mill running at 8.5GHz speed (which I doubt), but Intel isn´t going to release a chipset anytime soon that can hit ~450MHz FSB with desent memory speed and timings. 975X isn´t going to bring much difference compared to 955X.

[VictorWang]

8.5 ghz i doubt thats going to happen even on LN2

Yes Intel on LN2 does a great superpi run but I use mine to game with and encode DVDs


Intel won't be winning much on the gaming front until a better design of the CPU happens.
ALL -- AMD


Intel a threath hummm don't think so

atleast they are improving there products competition is good

when yonah comes.........AMD maybe lost in all the game

PCMark05, 4.2G 955xe easily got a score=7377 cpu score