Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: New Top Score in 01...or is it???

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    ca
    Posts
    4

    New Top Score in 01...or is it???

    Everybody remembers a couple months back all the controversey around the scores that Anabolic was acheiving and his bugged Windows install.

    Well anyways, he re-published a score from July 7 and is on the top of the ORB. Why he waited until now to publish it again, I really couldn't tell you, but he is now 3 points over Macci.

    http://service.futuremark.com/compare?2k1=6729581


    If this is legit, congratulations are in order , if not, why would he re-publish this after being told his scores were bugged by EVERYONE?

  2. #2
    Xtreme 3DMark Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,225
    he probably thinks no one will suspect the scores are bugged since hes only a bit ahead
    3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
    9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!

    9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
    9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
    9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
    9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
    3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
    Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
    3dmark scores with older gpus
    Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    249
    Ah Memories

  4. #4
    Xtreme 3DMark Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,225
    he needs to prove his score is legit or have it deleted
    3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
    9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!

    9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
    9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
    9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
    9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
    3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
    Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
    3dmark scores with older gpus
    Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551

  5. #5
    Xtreme Legend
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    669
    ya! I think he need to prove again! 26k with 263fsb and 3.9ghz...

    and what about the ati? 180fps on nature? (bugged?)

    cumps
    3dmark addict
    phase-change addict
    dirty benching addict
    tits lover

  6. #6
    Xtreme 3DMark Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,225
    He should post here and show everyone pics of his insanely modded rig and tell us the specs and video clocks in the sig. Its like he just jumped with a score 4k too high or something
    3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
    9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!

    9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
    9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
    9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
    9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
    3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
    Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
    3dmark scores with older gpus
    Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551

  7. #7

  8. #8
    Xtreme 3DMark Addict
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Posts
    4,225
    http://discuss.futuremark.com/forum/...16&vc=1&dbid=1


    you can post here and let them know, I reported his link for review, who agrees that his real score should be around 22k?
    3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
    9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!

    9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
    9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
    9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
    9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
    3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
    Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
    3dmark scores with older gpus
    Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551

  9. #9
    Xtreme 3D Mark Team Staff
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Juneau Alaska
    Posts
    7,607
    thats very disappointing of him, I haven't seen brett here in some time, but I know in general he's a good guy, and admittly showed that score was the bugged score, that also produced a 15k score on 2003...
    maybe my facts are alittle fuzzy, but I am fairly certain this is the same score from back then, which is very disappointing indeed.
    a cheap attempt at first place...
    he had very legit scores up to 24k with the same set up, then one weekend just did 26k with only a driver change as far as I can tell.
    which is definatly not enough to score another 2000...

    unless you benchmark with a FX ultra, and a 4403 driver on build 320 of 2003, haha.




    "The command and conquer model," said the EA CEO, "doesn't work. If you think you're going to buy a developer and put your name on the label... you're making a profound mistake."

  10. #10
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    He does not state his card clocks on that run so it is difficult to tell but the only excuse ( to give the benefit of the doubt ) I can think of is that he compared that run to macci's and thought the nature run was not that much higher. It probably isn't that much higher compared to some of his other runs . Maybe he has convinced himself that one is OK.

    Or maybe he is just sticking up two fingers ?

    Regrds

    Andy

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    345
    Days before there were some posts regarding that wrapper that produced artificially boosted scores, then his "bugged" scores, now this, TBH I think there was no bug, he knew exactly why, and what he was doing. Sad he is still playing with 3DA and posting scores not earned.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    ca
    Posts
    4
    It looks like he either took it down now or Futuremark deleted it.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    875
    I can't believe some of you guys still seem willing to give him the benefit of the doubt! Good guy or not, the previous episode proved, to my satisfaction anyway, that he was cheating.
    Abit NF7-S v1.2
    1700+ 0310WMPW @ 12.5x211 (2645MHz)
    Maze3 CPU + GPU watercooled
    2x256MB Corsair XMS3500C2
    Connect3d 9800 Pro @ 466/371 3dMark2001 - 20719
    Leadtek GF4 Ti4600 @ 351/770 3dMark2001 - 17497

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    1,083
    From what I remembered, he said something about his card not being volt-moded.... thats pretty much proved that his score was bugged.... I wouldnt go as far as calling him a cheater, but publishing a score that he knew is not legit is kinda low.....
    E8400 DFI LP P35T2R Ballistix

    8800GTS PCP&C 1.2kw Raptors

    E6600 =5400mhz
    E6700=5680mhz
    QX9650= 6000mhz

  15. #15
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Posts
    4,764
    Originally posted by MrLavender
    I can't believe some of you guys still seem willing to give him the benefit of the doubt! Good guy or not, the previous episode proved, to my satisfaction anyway, that he was cheating.
    That's because I am Saint Zakelwe the Patron Saint of Errant 3dMarkers ...

    I have to go out now and feed the baby deer and bluebirds that visit my garden paradise.



    Regads

    Saint Zak.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Denmark Frederikshavn
    Posts
    462
    Damn i cant believe why you all are whining about him being on top of the ORB ?
    -=Back In Business=-

  17. #17
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    875
    Originally posted by zakelwe
    That's because I am Saint Zakelwe the Patron Saint of Errant 3dMarkers ...

    I have to go out now and feed the baby deer and bluebirds that visit my garden paradise.



    Regads

    Saint Zak.
    LOL!
    Abit NF7-S v1.2
    1700+ 0310WMPW @ 12.5x211 (2645MHz)
    Maze3 CPU + GPU watercooled
    2x256MB Corsair XMS3500C2
    Connect3d 9800 Pro @ 466/371 3dMark2001 - 20719
    Leadtek GF4 Ti4600 @ 351/770 3dMark2001 - 17497

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    345
    Originally posted by Bra!nFreeZe^
    Damn i cant believe why you all are whining about him being on top of the ORB ?

    LOL, you one of those that cheats/cheated your way through school? Its called integrity, honor, credibility? any idea what those words mean??? At best, they were self admittededly "bugged" scores, so you feel bugged or cheat scores are ok?

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Kent, UK
    Posts
    169
    Shut up !!!!

    I dont cheat - never have. That was an accident, Its down now.

    Ruantic, i bet your like 16-18 worrying what everyone thinks. Pouncing on people and calling them cheats makes your life feel better.

    You dont know anything about me.
    Last edited by aNabolic; 09-14-2003 at 09:15 AM.

  20. #20
    Banned
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Posts
    971
    i dont view what he did as cheating, it was unintentional

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •