32 cores![]()
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
I will put this on my t-shirt. And it will make me irresitible to all nerdy girls![]()
GB-P31-DS3L|E2160@3Ghz|2GB DDR2-800|8800GT 700/2000|2xWD320GB 16M
Can't wait to see some game benchmarks.
how long til its out and about !!
Hopefully Nvidia will figure out a way to stay in the market after people start getting incentives to build AMD (AMD/ATI) only and Intel (Core/Larrabee) only systems.
Perkam
Late this year, early next year. So sometime in the winter months.
Its gonna hurt not only nVidia. But also AMD.
However it cant be fun to be nVidia. First you lose all chipsets/IGPs. Then someone comes and grab a good portion of your discrete card segment....ouch.
Last edited by Shintai; 05-12-2009 at 03:35 AM.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
Yeah I bet Larabee wuill hurt something. My Bananas.. Until I see REAL proof IE benchmarks I think this is about as exciting as the i740 intel graphics deaccelerator.
I just don't see all developers Jumping on the Larabee bandwagon, unless intel graphic drivers are superb. Frankly I never had any luck with the garbage drivers intel releases for their gimped/garbage 3d deaccelerators.
larrabee has much more to offer then just graphics power....
i predict amd going down this route as well.. as of right now, a route nvidia wont be able to follow .
mmhhh you might wanna think twice if thats really what you want...
and itll also attract male nerds who will "try" to socialize with you
rather messy to use other words
id say cebit time, same time as gt300
it depends... drivers, pricing...
if larrabee is really as fast as intel claims, intel will be eating into nvidias market share from the top and ati from the bottom... might be interesting...
and thank god for no more nvidia chipsets... although it IS a shame... they could have come up with an x58 competitor that has lower qpi multipliers to allow higher bclocks... 250 bclock on air would have been quite nice...
>i5-3570K
>Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
>Asus GTX 670 Mini
>Cooltek Coolcube Black
>CM Silent Pro M700
>Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
>Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!
Originally Posted by Movieman
Posted by duploxxx
I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
Posted by gallag
there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.qft!
from the data i saw on the wiki by intel. 25 cores was needed to keep FEAR at 1680x1050 with 4xaa. that was at 1ghz too, so i wonder if they produce this at the actual 2.4ghz with 32 cores, it could be quite close to ati and nvidia top offerings. however i also saw the chip was supposedly 49mmx49mm, just massive in die size. so i guess its really gonna be interesting to see theoretical costs and benchmarks.
i heard ~600mm², probably more
system:
Phenom II 920 3.5Ghz @ 1.4v, benchstable @ over 3,6Ghz (didnt test higher)
xigmatek achilles
sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 820 1020
Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
8gb a-data 4-4-4-12 800
x-fi xtrememusic
rip 2x 160gb maxtor(now that adds up to 4...)
320gb/250gb/500gb samsung
"When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman
Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |
Intel will not release regular driver updates. That is not a software development model that they will be able to integrate into their business. Imagine what kind of performance you will get out of year old video drivers.
i5 750 @ 4.2ghz
EVGA P55 FTW
8gig G.Skill Ripjaw @ 1055mhz
Gigabyte 6950 modded
Seasonic X-650
Antec P180 modded and watercooled
Thermochill PA160
Apogee XT
MCP350
Will it really hurt amd and nvidia? Gt300 and rv870 will hurt high-performance computing with the cpu. Cpus will become less important, so intel really needs a product against it. Intel will get market share, but the market should grow fast with opencl. I don't think Larrabee will be a good choice for gamers, but it will be strong in gpgpu.
Intel eating nvs market share from the top??? Never heard intel claiming this. All comments i heard are that it's a performance chip, so first it has to beat rv870.
Can someone please enlighten me. Is this larrabee supposed to be a high-end GPU or an "improved" integrated GPU in a motherboard?
|ASUS Sabertooth Z77|Intel Core I7-2700K|32GB G.Skill TridentX F3-2400C10Q-32GTX|Corsair AX1200W|
|ASUS GTX TITAN + Zotac GTX680 for PhysX|Samsung S27A950D|Corsair Obsidian 800D|Corsair Hydro Series H100|
|ASUS Crosshair IV Formula|AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE|16GB G.Skill RipjawsX F3-12800CL7D-8GBXH|
|2X AMD Radeon HD6970 Crossfire|TT Kandalf - MOD|Corsair HX1000W|Corsair Hydro Series H70|
Its a GPGPU. But it will also be used as IGP in a CPU later on. Think something like 4-8 cores in IGP. 8-32 Cores in discrete GFX card. (Larrabee cores).
LOL! Ye and CUDA and CTM already made the CPU so obsolete. They are both useless.
RV870/GT300/Larrabee is still an utter joke for generel computing. Larrabee would be by large portions the fastest of the 3 in those terms. And we talk about Atom performance.
I dont think RVxxx/GTxxx can do even 5% of what a CPU can. RVxxx/GTxxx are very fast at a very very limited amount of things. They are DSP type chips. Even Cell can do much more than those 2.
Last edited by Shintai; 05-12-2009 at 11:36 AM.
Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.
I don't know. Some new games run fine on my x3100 and some old games run like crap. OpenGL performance is piss poor from what I've experienced.
Technically the hardware sucks off course.
I really have no high expectations from the first Larrabee generation.
Display drivers from AMD and nVidia both have about the same amount of code that Windows XP has. That's allot. Considering Intel doesn't have any good drivers at this moment with good game support, I don't think they will manage to make one within the first year ofter the Larrabee release.
>i5-3570K
>Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
>Asus GTX 670 Mini
>Cooltek Coolcube Black
>CM Silent Pro M700
>Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
>Cooler Master Seidon 120M
Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!
It's a good point, but Larrabee is a highstakes gamble for Intel and I'm sure they're going to do whatever they can to bring as much initial performance as possible. I think Intel is slowly but steadily taking over every performance segment of general computing with their hardware/implementation; ipc, ram bandwidth (1st generation imc implementation mind you), ssds in the io dept. and now gpgpu in graphics processing.
Athlon 64 3200+ | ASUS M2A-VM 0202 | Corsair XMS2 TWIN2X2048-6400 | 3ware 9650SE 4LPML | Seasonic SS-380HB | Antec Solo
Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz | ASUS P5WDG2-WS Pro 1001 | Gigabyte 4850HD Silent | G.Skill F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ | Samsung MCCOE64G5MPP-0VA SLC SSD | Seasonic M12 650 | Antec P180
Core i7-2600K @ 4.3 GHz @ 1.30V | ASUS P8P67 Pro | Sparkle GTX 560 Ti | G.Skill Ripjaw X F3-12800CL8 4x4GB @ 933MHz 9-10-9-24 2T | Crucial C300 128GB | Seasonic X750 Gold | Antec P183
Bookmarks