Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 68

Thread: Larrabee - lets get naked!

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Bulgaria, Varna
    Posts
    447

    Larrabee - lets get naked!


  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    32 cores
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    103
    I will put this on my t-shirt. And it will make me irresitible to all nerdy girls
    GB-P31-DS3L|E2160@3Ghz|2GB DDR2-800|8800GT 700/2000|2xWD320GB 16M

  4. #4
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Austria
    Posts
    5,485
    the core setup is rather interrestening:
    1|2|2|3|1|1
    4|4|4
    1|2|2|4|1

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    1,366
    Can't wait to see some game benchmarks.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    uk , bristol
    Posts
    312
    how long til its out and about !!

  7. #7
    Live Long And Overclock
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Posts
    14,058
    Hopefully Nvidia will figure out a way to stay in the market after people start getting incentives to build AMD (AMD/ATI) only and Intel (Core/Larrabee) only systems.

    Perkam

  8. #8
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by Dragy2k View Post
    how long til its out and about !!
    Late this year, early next year. So sometime in the winter months.

    Quote Originally Posted by perkam View Post
    Hopefully Nvidia will figure out a way to stay in the market after people start getting incentives to build AMD (AMD/ATI) only and Intel (Core/Larrabee) only systems.

    Perkam
    Its gonna hurt not only nVidia. But also AMD.

    However it cant be fun to be nVidia. First you lose all chipsets/IGPs. Then someone comes and grab a good portion of your discrete card segment....ouch.
    Last edited by Shintai; 05-12-2009 at 03:35 AM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  9. #9
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Posts
    243
    Yeah I bet Larabee wuill hurt something. My Bananas.. Until I see REAL proof IE benchmarks I think this is about as exciting as the i740 intel graphics deaccelerator.

    I just don't see all developers Jumping on the Larabee bandwagon, unless intel graphic drivers are superb. Frankly I never had any luck with the garbage drivers intel releases for their gimped/garbage 3d deaccelerators.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    525
    larrabee has much more to offer then just graphics power....

    i predict amd going down this route as well.. as of right now, a route nvidia wont be able to follow .

  11. #11
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by tenebre View Post
    I will put this on my t-shirt. And it will make me irresitible to all nerdy girls
    mmhhh you might wanna think twice if thats really what you want...
    and itll also attract male nerds who will "try" to socialize with you


    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    the core setup is rather interrestening:
    1|2|2|3|1|1
    4|4|4
    1|2|2|4|1
    rather messy to use other words

    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Late this year, early next year. So sometime in the winter months.
    id say cebit time, same time as gt300

    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Its gonna hurt not only nVidia. But also AMD
    it depends... drivers, pricing...

    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    However it cant be fun to be nVidia. First you lose all chipsets/IGPs. Then someone comes and grab a good portion of your discrete card segment....ouch.
    if larrabee is really as fast as intel claims, intel will be eating into nvidias market share from the top and ati from the bottom... might be interesting...

    and thank god for no more nvidia chipsets... although it IS a shame... they could have come up with an x58 competitor that has lower qpi multipliers to allow higher bclocks... 250 bclock on air would have been quite nice...

  12. #12
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    Quote Originally Posted by rozzyroz View Post
    larrabee has much more to offer then just graphics power....

    i predict amd going down this route as well.. as of right now, a route nvidia wont be able to follow .
    heh, youve just proven how effective marketing can be
    you dont know a thing about intels nvidias or atis future product but already made up your mind based on the marketing those companies have seeded

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands, Friesland
    Posts
    2,244
    Quote Originally Posted by rozzyroz View Post
    larrabee has much more to offer then just graphics power....

    i predict amd going down this route as well.. as of right now, a route nvidia wont be able to follow .
    It better be, otherwise I'm not interested. Intel vga drivers for current generations simply suck for playing games.
    >i5-3570K
    >Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
    >Asus GTX 670 Mini
    >Cooltek Coolcube Black
    >CM Silent Pro M700
    >Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
    >Cooler Master Seidon 120M
    Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!

  14. #14
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Little Rock
    Posts
    7,204
    Quote Originally Posted by ownage View Post
    It better be, otherwise I'm not interested. Intel vga drivers for current generations simply suck for playing games.
    It sucking had NOTHING to do with drivers, it's weak Hardware. I've never had any problems with Intel's IGP Drivers. Or even the integrated ATI rage drivers that Intel shipped, I can't say the same for nVidia, SIS and or VIA
    Quote Originally Posted by Movieman
    With the two approaches to "how" to design a processor WE are the lucky ones as we get to choose what is important to us as individuals.
    For that we should thank BOTH (AMD and Intel) companies!


    Posted by duploxxx
    I am sure JF is relaxed and smiling these days with there intended launch schedule. SNB Xeon servers on the other hand....
    Posted by gallag
    there yo go bringing intel into a amd thread again lol, if that was someone droping a dig at amd you would be crying like a girl.
    qft!

  15. #15
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    7,750
    from the data i saw on the wiki by intel. 25 cores was needed to keep FEAR at 1680x1050 with 4xaa. that was at 1ghz too, so i wonder if they produce this at the actual 2.4ghz with 32 cores, it could be quite close to ati and nvidia top offerings. however i also saw the chip was supposedly 49mmx49mm, just massive in die size. so i guess its really gonna be interesting to see theoretical costs and benchmarks.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    germany-münster
    Posts
    375
    i heard ~600mm², probably more
    system:

    Phenom II 920 3.5Ghz @ 1.4v, benchstable @ over 3,6Ghz (didnt test higher)
    xigmatek achilles
    sapphire hd4870 1gb @ 820 1020
    Gigabyte GA-MA790GP-DS4H
    8gb a-data 4-4-4-12 800
    x-fi xtrememusic
    rip 2x 160gb maxtor(now that adds up to 4...)
    320gb/250gb/500gb samsung

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    City of Lights, The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,381
    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    heh, youve just proven how effective marketing can be
    you dont know a thing about intels nvidias or atis future product but already made up your mind based on the marketing those companies have seeded
    Does AMD(ATI) do marketing? I barely knew .
    "When in doubt, C-4!" -- Jamie Hyneman

    Silverstone TJ-09 Case | Seasonic X-750 PSU | Intel Core i5 750 CPU | ASUS P7P55D PRO Mobo | OCZ 4GB DDR3 RAM | ATI Radeon 5850 GPU | Intel X-25M 80GB SSD | WD 2TB HDD | Windows 7 x64 | NEC EA23WMi 23" Monitor |Auzentech X-Fi Forte Soundcard | Creative T3 2.1 Speakers | AudioTechnica AD900 Headphone |

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    196
    Intel will not release regular driver updates. That is not a software development model that they will be able to integrate into their business. Imagine what kind of performance you will get out of year old video drivers.
    i5 750 @ 4.2ghz
    EVGA P55 FTW
    8gig G.Skill Ripjaw @ 1055mhz
    Gigabyte 6950 modded
    Seasonic X-650
    Antec P180 modded and watercooled
    Thermochill PA160
    Apogee XT
    MCP350

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    72
    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    Its gonna hurt not only nVidia. But also AMD.

    However it cant be fun to be nVidia. First you lose all chipsets/IGPs. Then someone comes and grab a good portion of your discrete card segment....ouch.
    Will it really hurt amd and nvidia? Gt300 and rv870 will hurt high-performance computing with the cpu. Cpus will become less important, so intel really needs a product against it. Intel will get market share, but the market should grow fast with opencl. I don't think Larrabee will be a good choice for gamers, but it will be strong in gpgpu.

    Quote Originally Posted by saaya View Post
    if larrabee is really as fast as intel claims, intel will be eating into nvidias market share from the top and ati from the bottom... might be interesting...
    Intel eating nvs market share from the top??? Never heard intel claiming this. All comments i heard are that it's a performance chip, so first it has to beat rv870.

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    70
    Quote Originally Posted by RVWinkle View Post
    Intel will not release regular driver updates. That is not a software development model that they will be able to integrate into their business. Imagine what kind of performance you will get out of year old video drivers.
    Where is the proof to that? Intel releases new drivers for their integrated vga about every couple weeks.
    Last edited by .Tret; 05-12-2009 at 08:24 AM.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Slovenia
    Posts
    209
    Can someone please enlighten me. Is this larrabee supposed to be a high-end GPU or an "improved" integrated GPU in a motherboard?
    |ASUS Sabertooth Z77|Intel Core I7-2700K|32GB G.Skill TridentX F3-2400C10Q-32GTX|Corsair AX1200W|
    |ASUS GTX TITAN + Zotac GTX680 for PhysX|Samsung S27A950D|Corsair Obsidian 800D|Corsair Hydro Series H100|

    |ASUS Crosshair IV Formula|AMD Phenom II X6 1090T BE|16GB G.Skill RipjawsX F3-12800CL7D-8GBXH|
    |2X AMD Radeon HD6970 Crossfire|TT Kandalf - MOD|Corsair HX1000W|Corsair Hydro Series H70|

  22. #22
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    7,747
    Quote Originally Posted by BuBBle.D View Post
    Can someone please enlighten me. Is this larrabee supposed to be a high-end GPU or an "improved" integrated GPU in a motherboard?
    Its a GPGPU. But it will also be used as IGP in a CPU later on. Think something like 4-8 cores in IGP. 8-32 Cores in discrete GFX card. (Larrabee cores).

    Quote Originally Posted by AffenJack View Post
    Will it really hurt amd and nvidia? Gt300 and rv870 will hurt high-performance computing with the cpu. Cpus will become less important, so intel really needs a product against it. Intel will get market share, but the market should grow fast with opencl. I don't think Larrabee will be a good choice for gamers, but it will be strong in gpgpu.
    LOL! Ye and CUDA and CTM already made the CPU so obsolete. They are both useless.

    RV870/GT300/Larrabee is still an utter joke for generel computing. Larrabee would be by large portions the fastest of the 3 in those terms. And we talk about Atom performance.

    I dont think RVxxx/GTxxx can do even 5% of what a CPU can. RVxxx/GTxxx are very fast at a very very limited amount of things. They are DSP type chips. Even Cell can do much more than those 2.
    Last edited by Shintai; 05-12-2009 at 11:36 AM.
    Crunching for Comrades and the Common good of the People.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands, Friesland
    Posts
    2,244
    Quote Originally Posted by Donnie27 View Post
    It sucking had NOTHING to do with drivers, it's weak Hardware. I've never had any problems with Intel's IGP Drivers. Or even the integrated ATI rage drivers that Intel shipped, I can't say the same for nVidia, SIS and or VIA
    I don't know. Some new games run fine on my x3100 and some old games run like crap. OpenGL performance is piss poor from what I've experienced.
    Technically the hardware sucks off course.

    I really have no high expectations from the first Larrabee generation.
    Display drivers from AMD and nVidia both have about the same amount of code that Windows XP has. That's allot. Considering Intel doesn't have any good drivers at this moment with good game support, I don't think they will manage to make one within the first year ofter the Larrabee release.
    >i5-3570K
    >Asrock Z77E-ITX Wifi
    >Asus GTX 670 Mini
    >Cooltek Coolcube Black
    >CM Silent Pro M700
    >Crucial M4 128Gb Msata
    >Cooler Master Seidon 120M
    Hell yes its a mini-ITX gaming rig!

  24. #24
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Haslett, MI
    Posts
    2,221
    Quote Originally Posted by ownage View Post
    I don't know. Some new games run fine on my x3100 and some old games run like crap. OpenGL performance is piss poor from what I've experienced.
    Technically the hardware sucks off course.

    I really have no high expectations from the first Larrabee generation.
    Display drivers from AMD and nVidia both have about the same amount of code that Windows XP has. That's allot. Considering Intel doesn't have any good drivers at this moment with good game support, I don't think they will manage to make one within the first year ofter the Larrabee release.
    It's a good point, but Larrabee is a highstakes gamble for Intel and I'm sure they're going to do whatever they can to bring as much initial performance as possible. I think Intel is slowly but steadily taking over every performance segment of general computing with their hardware/implementation; ipc, ram bandwidth (1st generation imc implementation mind you), ssds in the io dept. and now gpgpu in graphics processing.

  25. #25
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Sillicon Valley, California
    Posts
    1,261
    Quote Originally Posted by Hornet331 View Post
    the core setup is rather interrestening:
    1|2|2|3|1|1
    4|4|4
    1|2|2|4|1
    kinda messy imo, was expecting something symmetrical. but the way they laid it out is probably impacted somewhat by switching inductance
    Athlon 64 3200+ | ASUS M2A-VM 0202 | Corsair XMS2 TWIN2X2048-6400 | 3ware 9650SE 4LPML | Seasonic SS-380HB | Antec Solo
    Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3.0GHz | ASUS P5WDG2-WS Pro 1001 | Gigabyte 4850HD Silent | G.Skill F2-6400PHU2-2GBHZ | Samsung MCCOE64G5MPP-0VA SLC SSD | Seasonic M12 650 | Antec P180
    Core i7-2600K @ 4.3 GHz @ 1.30V | ASUS P8P67 Pro | Sparkle GTX 560 Ti | G.Skill Ripjaw X F3-12800CL8 4x4GB @ 933MHz 9-10-9-24 2T | Crucial C300 128GB | Seasonic X750 Gold | Antec P183


    Quote Originally Posted by Shintai View Post
    DRAM production lines are simple and extremely cheap in a ultra low profit market.

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •