Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 101

Thread: NVIDIA 8600GT and 8600GTS Pictured

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Taiwan
    Posts
    882

    NVIDIA 8600GT and 8600GTS Pictured


    Replace the 7600GT,G84-300 GPU 540MHz and 128-bit GDDR3 RAM(128MB or 256MB) at 1400MHz ,Price 150~180



    Replace the 7900GS ,G84-400 GPU 675MHz and 128-bit GDDR3 RAM (256MB or 512MB) at 2000MHz ,Price 200~250

    techpowerup

  2. #2
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    2,462
    just wanted to post the same :p

    the cooler of both cards are quite tiny and out of Aluminium, so it looks like the don't need that much energy
    Notice any grammar or spelling mistakes? Feel free to correct me! Thanks

  3. #3
    all outta gum
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    3,390
    It seems like 8600 GT's PCB has lots of unused space, so it will probably be available in low-profile version.
    www.teampclab.pl
    MOA 2009 Poland #2, AMD Black Ops 2010, MOA 2011 Poland #1, MOA 2011 EMEA #12

    Test bench: empty

  4. #4
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    1,905
    Am I mistaken in believing that the 8600GT is likely to be getting '05 scores in the area of an X1900XT?
    -


    "Language cuts the grooves in which our thoughts must move" | Frank Herbert, The Santaroga Barrier
    2600K | GTX 580 SLI | Asus MIV Gene-Z | 16GB @ 1600 | Silverstone Strider 1200W Gold | Crucial C300 64 | Crucial M4 64 | Intel X25-M 160 G2 | OCZ Vertex 60 | Hitachi 2TB | WD 320

  5. #5
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    693
    Bet 8600GT will be great for physics.
    P5B Deluxe/WiFi-AP
    Core 2 Duo E6300 @ 2.8GHz
    GeForce 8800GTS




    CLICK THIS:http://www.projectoffset.com/astormiscoming/ Each unique view moves the bar up. Last time it filled, a new picture was revealed.

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Miichiigan
    Posts
    517
    you sure? I dunno. It looks like it wont throw much more weight than the 7600GT.
    Heatware, Ebay, Facebook
    Current Laptop:
    Cyber Power PC
    Xplorer X1M
    Intel Core i7 3610qm
    8GB DDR3 1333
    240GB OCZ Agility
    Nvidia Geforce GT650m 2GB GDDR5
    1TB Toshiba external portable drive

    Backup Laptop:
    Asus G60JX
    Intel Core i7 720qm
    8GB DDR3 1333
    256GB ADATA
    Nvidia Geforce GTS 360m 1GB GDDR5
    640GB Western Digital external portable drive

  7. #7
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    738
    shouldn't the 8600gts have a 256bit interface if its using the same pcb as the 7900gs ?
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    real men like the idea of packing lots of stuff into a very small space, which is what the mac mini is
    ----------------------------------------------------

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron_Davis View Post
    PS. I'm even tougher IRL.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    eu/hungary/budapest.tmp
    Posts
    1,591
    Quote Originally Posted by Wiggy McShades View Post
    shouldn't the 8600gts have a 256bit interface if its using the same pcb as the 7900gs ?
    It's replacing the 7900GS in the price/performance ladder, but it is still a G84
    built on the 7600-series pcb, with 128bit ( ). The 8900GS will have 256bit
    IIRC/if teh sources are right.
    Usual suspects: i5-750 & H212+ | Biostar T5XE CFX-SLI | 4GB RAndoM | 4850 + AC S1 + 120@5V + modded stock for VRAM/VRM | Seasonic S12-600 | 7200.12 | P180 | U2311H & S2253BW | MX518
    mITX media & to-be-server machine: A330ION | Seasonic SFX | WD600BEVS boot & WD15EARS data
    Laptops: Lifebook T4215 tablet, Vaio TX3XP
    Bike: ZX6R

  9. #9
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,693
    Quote Originally Posted by Wiggy McShades View Post
    shouldn't the 8600gts have a 256bit interface if its using the same pcb as the 7900gs ?
    were does it say it uses the same pcb as the 7900gs?

    it only says that it will replace the 7900GS in Nvidias lineup
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    Groucho Marx



    i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    386
    Cheap DX10 thrills. 8600GTS doesnt look that bad if you are on a small budget.

  11. #11
    all outta gum
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    3,390
    They are not built on 7000 series PCB's. You can't put a chip on a PCB designed for totally different chip.
    www.teampclab.pl
    MOA 2009 Poland #2, AMD Black Ops 2010, MOA 2011 Poland #1, MOA 2011 EMEA #12

    Test bench: empty

  12. #12
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Posts
    738
    Quote Originally Posted by xoqolatl View Post
    They are not built on 7000 series PCB's. You can't put a chip on a PCB designed for totally different chip.


    those look identical to the 7000 series pcbs.
    Quote Originally Posted by Manicdan View Post
    real men like the idea of packing lots of stuff into a very small space, which is what the mac mini is
    ----------------------------------------------------

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron_Davis View Post
    PS. I'm even tougher IRL.

  13. #13
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Cairo
    Posts
    2,366
    IMO 8800GTS 320MB 2 weeks ago better than 8600GT next month
    Intel Core I7 920 @ 3.8GHZ 1.28V (Core Contact Freezer)
    Asus X58 P6T
    6GB OCZ Gold DDR3-1600MHZ 8-8-8-24
    XFX HD5870
    WD 1TB Black HD
    Corsair 850TX
    Cooler Master HAF 922

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    eu/hungary/budapest.tmp
    Posts
    1,591
    Quote Originally Posted by xoqolatl View Post
    They are not built on 7000 series PCB's. You can't put a chip on a PCB designed for totally different chip.
    Of course it's modified, but the gpus are pin-compatible; with the pcbs being
    similar, they could ramp production quickly.
    Usual suspects: i5-750 & H212+ | Biostar T5XE CFX-SLI | 4GB RAndoM | 4850 + AC S1 + 120@5V + modded stock for VRAM/VRM | Seasonic S12-600 | 7200.12 | P180 | U2311H & S2253BW | MX518
    mITX media & to-be-server machine: A330ION | Seasonic SFX | WD600BEVS boot & WD15EARS data
    Laptops: Lifebook T4215 tablet, Vaio TX3XP
    Bike: ZX6R

  15. #15
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    if the GTS is 250...

    the the pricing can't eb right, because the 320mb version of the 8800GTs should be falling to around that level soon, especially considering that it now has DX10 competition.

  16. #16
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    Quote Originally Posted by xoqolatl View Post
    They are not built on 7000 series PCB's. You can't put a chip on a PCB designed for totally different chip.
    just like how you can't place a s939 Athlon x2 in a s939 athlon 64 board....

  17. #17
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Miichiigan
    Posts
    517
    How can you have 512mb of ram if you have a 128bit interface???
    to my understanding, you can't...
    Heatware, Ebay, Facebook
    Current Laptop:
    Cyber Power PC
    Xplorer X1M
    Intel Core i7 3610qm
    8GB DDR3 1333
    240GB OCZ Agility
    Nvidia Geforce GT650m 2GB GDDR5
    1TB Toshiba external portable drive

    Backup Laptop:
    Asus G60JX
    Intel Core i7 720qm
    8GB DDR3 1333
    256GB ADATA
    Nvidia Geforce GTS 360m 1GB GDDR5
    640GB Western Digital external portable drive

  18. #18
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    HD0
    Posts
    2,646
    Quote Originally Posted by squilliam View Post
    How can you have 512mb of ram if you have a 128bit interface???
    to my understanding, you can't...
    how can you have 512mb with a 64 bit interface?
    http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16814141054


    the capacity of the ICs has relatively little to do with the MC controlling them.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Washington State
    Posts
    1,315
    Ew 128bit ram. if it was 256bit/512mb it would be a nice step up from a x1900 or a 7900. Though I am curious to how they bench... Maybe these will be a good as the 6800U/9800XT Generation was compared to the FX series... lol

    Personally Im waiting for R600 to hit the market. Im hoping that competition will drive last gen prices down even further. $250 or less 1900XTX 512mb or a 7900GT Sli setup would be lovely, since I have no interest in DX10 games at the moment. My X850XT is enough for everything I play.
    Phenom 9950BE @ 3.24Ghz| ASUS M3A78-T | ASUS 4870 | 4gb G.SKILL DDR2-1000 |Silverstone Strider 600w ST60F| XFI Xtremegamer | Seagate 7200.10 320gb | Maxtor 200gb 7200rpm 16mb | Samsung 206BW | MCP655 | MCR320 | Apogee | MCW60 | MM U2-UFO |

    A64 3800+ X2 AM2 @3.2Ghz| Biostar TF560 A2+ | 2gb Crucial Ballistix DDR2-800 | Sapphire 3870 512mb | Aircooled inside a White MM-UFO Horizon |

    Current Phenom overclock


    Max Phenom overclock

  20. #20
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    over the rainbow
    Posts
    964
    If u play in low res and without aa/af you danot have to care about 128Bit.
    AMD Phenom II X6 1055T@3.5GHz@Scythe Mugen 2 <-> ASRock 970 Extreme4 <-> 8GB DDR3-1333 <-> Sapphire HD7870@1100/1300 <-> Samsung F3 <-> Win8.1 x64 <-> Acer Slim Line S243HL <-> BQT E9-CM 480W

  21. #21
    Xtreme X.I.P. Soulburner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Lincoln, NE
    Posts
    8,868
    Quote Originally Posted by Baron View Post
    Cheap DX10 thrills. 8600GTS doesnt look that bad if you are on a small budget.
    It supports the API but won't have enough power to push it in a truly next-gen game, as with all budget cards.

    But hey, at least "DX10" makes it looks good on paper to the guys who walk in to Best Buy not knowing any better paying $299 for them.
    System
    ASUS Z170-Pro
    Skylake i7-6700K @ 4600 Mhz
    MSI GTX 1070 Armor OC
    32 GB G.Skill Ripjaws V
    Samsung 850 EVO (2)
    EVGA SuperNOVA 650 G2
    Corsair Hydro H90
    NZXT S340

  22. #22
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    229
    Quote Originally Posted by xoqolatl View Post
    They are not built on 7000 series PCB's. You can't put a chip on a PCB designed for totally different chip.
    I don't know that the PCB is identical, but there was a pretty big thread on this a month or so ago, I think there was some indications that Nvidia is planned to share a lot of the PCB as a cost saving implementation.

    Quote Originally Posted by Soulburner View Post
    It supports the API but won't have enough power to push it in a truly next-gen game, as with all budget cards.
    Yeah, I hate it when Nvidia does that, the 256meg Geforce 5200 comes to mind. DX9 with barely enough power to run the DX8 path of any game designed 2 years before it. And no possible way to turn up the graphics high enough to utilize all of that RAM.

  23. #23
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    i will be interested to see how these perform with only 128bit but i might step up a 7600gt to the 8600gt without much of a cost hit. even with the 128bit i think the 8600gts will out do the 7900gt and maybe trade punches with the 7900gtx and 1900 series after you oc it a bit.
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  24. #24
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    2,693
    Quote Originally Posted by falqon View Post



    Yeah, I hate it when Nvidia does that, the 256meg Geforce 5200 comes to mind. DX9 with barely enough power to run the DX8 path of any game designed 2 years before it. And no possible way to turn up the graphics high enough to utilize all of that RAM.

    they both do it (nvidia and ati)
    its partialy to sell cards to those idiots that think the amount of RAM is the most imporant bit on a grafix card.
    Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
    Groucho Marx



    i know my grammar sux so stop hitting me

  25. #25
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Do
    Posts
    267
    Quote Originally Posted by Starscream View Post
    they both do it (nvidia and ati)
    its partialy to sell cards to those idiots that think the amount of RAM is the most imporant bit on a grafix card.
    That's right mate. I know a lot of people that still think the amount of ram is what matters in a Videocard
    Excuse me for my English

Page 1 of 5 1234 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •