Yes
No
Only if they replace it with one that gauges CPU+GPU+Mem Performance
Hey guys, this poll corresponds to OPP's thread here: http://www.xtremesystems.org/forums/...ad.php?t=56115 so basically the topic is on whether 3d01 should stay or not.
Pls feel free to vote any way you want and NO the third choice is NOT a "maybe" lol, its actually a pretty good suggestion from Charlie.
Perkam
Last edited by perkam; 03-14-2005 at 03:27 PM.
A much more intense overall system benchmark is the way to go. If it's not on Futuremark's schedule, and they remove support, I'll keep using 01, simply not with the ORB.
We can create our own LIST of the higher marks but yeah it wouldnt be easy. And Kunaak alone cant check to see if ALL of the thousands benchie screenshots are admissable, etc.I'll keep using 01, simply not with the ORB.
Perkam
I think most would agree that 2001se has lived it's life and should probably be let go.
The only problem is we just don't think Futuremark will be able to deliver anything better. Thus bencher's are reluctant to let go of it...
Everything has an end, but they must give us something to our "insomnia"!
Only if its relaced...
Phenom II 940 BE / ASUS M4A79 / HD5770 Crossfire
3770mhz CPU 2600mhz NB | DDR1040 5-5-5-15 | 900/1250
Oh yeah thats another alternative, RELACE IT !!! LOLOnly if its relaced...
Yes but replaced with what though ?
Perkam
Its old DX8 stuff. Although I'm not too happy with 03 and 05, 01 is still lived passed its usefulness. Its a lot like running the Quake3 timedemo now.
9900k @ 5.1Ghz
Asus Maximus Hero XI
32GB (8 x 4) Gskill @4000
Strix 2080 Ti OC
OS & Apps: Samsung 970 Pro 512GB
Games: Samsung 970 Pro 1TB
Storage: Crucial M500 2TB
Seasonic Platinum 1000W
Phanteks Evolv X
trash it! out with the old in with the new. whatever it is
NO, it's the only one I get better than 5k with, lol
honestly though it doesn't really reflect any games currently being developed, but it is the most widly known, and most focoused on, so quoting your 3dmark01 score means more to more people than quoting your 03 or 05 score.
Microsoft's homepage can be found at: thesource-dot-ofallevil-dot-com - interesting, no?
Think of something witty and imagine it here.
Agreed.Originally Posted by afireinside
Ditto. 03 is not a CPU test. 05 is not a CPU test. Car low IS
NZXT Tempest | Corsair 1000W
Creative X-FI Titanium Fatal1ty Pro
Intel i7 2500K Corsair H100
PNY GTX 470 SLi (700 / 1400 / 1731 / 950mv)
Asus P8Z68-V Pro
Kingston HyperX PC3-10700 (4x4096MB)(9-9-9-28 @ 1600mhz @ 1.5v)
Heatware: 13-0-0
It needs to be replaced by a bench that tests the gfx, cpu and mem rather than just the graphics. People with uber graphics cards could easily post top notch scores, with crappy cpu's and memory.
.:. X2 @ 2.9 .:. E6600 L628 @ 4.73 .:. AB9 @ 512 FSB .:. E6300 @ 100% OC Stable
U.K. overclockers: Represent your country, bench for EP-UK! Unite and show the world there IS a U.K. scene!
replace with cinebench
Maybe... o_0 if Cinema4D releases 3d animations that ACTUALLY look even a little good when ur looping them over and over againreplace with cinebenchgfx in cinebench 2003 are horrible except for the test where render that medieval image with guy under the bridge thing.
Perkam
give me 3dmark 2003SE or 2005SE that more balanced
Like most I would like to see a quality replacement...We all know '01 so well. Lobby high is a good way to see if your extra bandwidth did anything, nature looped is my GPU stress test run about 25 times to see if its stable, and car low for CPU. I still like it but a DX9 version would be nice. I don't run my DFI on the web anyways so I don't post scores and I don't use em as an extension of my _____ but I do use it to test my OCs. 05...I don't really like but '03 is pretty good for heating up my GC, though not as good as..... the rthdsl or whatever its name is
Hey, that's tradition you're messing with now!!!
I dont think FM will replace 2k1 with another cpu/gpu/mem bench. Because it would kill 3dmark03, and 3dmark05. They invested too much in those benchmarks already to abandon it so quickly. I just think 2k1 will be retired thats it. We can still bench and use it, but it will no longer be supported. Like the 3dmark2000.
--===== proud owner of new razor tarantula gaming keyboard =====--
Yes, unless they revamp it towards nvidia cards and make it less cpu and more towards both
keep 2001 alive! Its not much fun to bench when you cant see the orb and the compare bars, screenshots dont mean much
3000+ Venice 240x9=2.16GHz(ondie controller limit) 2x512mb patriot tccd ram
9700pro at 325/310 runs all games buttery smooth!
9700(8 pipe softmod, 128m) at 410/325 23821 at 325/310 21287 at 275/270 19159
9500(4 pipes, 128m) at 420/330 18454 at 275/270 13319
9500(8 pipe softmod, 64m) at 390/310 19201 at 275/270 16052
9500(4 pipes, 64m) at 400/310 16215 at 275/270 12560
3dmark scores with Ti4200 and Ti4800se
Ti4200 at 340/730 19558 at 300/650 18032 at 275/550 16494 at 250/500 15295
3dmark scores with older gpus
Ti500 at 275/620 14588 Ti200 at 260/540 13557 MX440 at 380/680 11551
I'm thinking 3dmark2006 which has a girl who strips off rendered with 2 million polygons ( if it was good enough for 3dmark 99...)
As well as marks awarded for fps it also has a biometric function where it measures heartbeat and bloodflow to various parts of the body. It also lasts for 5 minutes so all those benchers under 20 have no chance
Regards
Andy
oh man! we would try to run with the screen off, but 2 million polygons says watch me...I'm thinking 3dmark2006 which has a girl who strips off rendered with 2 million polygons ( if it was good enough for 3dmark 99...)
As well as marks awarded for fps it also has a biometric function where it measures heartbeat and bloodflow to various parts of the body. It also lasts for 5 minutes so all those benchers under 20 have no chance
Regards
Andy
I dunno, 05 was quick enough in taking all those amazing scores from 03 and transforming them into two digit fps so I'm not too eager to see an R520 get like 20fps in 3dmark2007/6 etc.oh man! we would try to run with the screen off, but 2 million polygons says watch me...
And I seriously dont think adult 3d animation would be used by Futuremark because they loop the bench at trade shows and product launches, not to mention it would require a 21+ requirement to download it which would only alienate younger audiences.
LOL i scrolled back up to see who suggested it and then I see OMG ZAKALWE...
Spending too much time "alone" in the shed are we ?LOL
Perkam
I know, I'm a heretic
Hey, that's tradition you're messing with now!!!
Seriously though. If we followed the "save 3D01" sentiment to its logical end, we'd also have to bring back 3D99 too. It was a full system measure as well.....Not too mention cool as hell (it was close to 3D01 in style and the music was just awesome). But, that doesn't mean its useful today.
But...*sigh*...I sort of miss the old Mad Onion days
Last edited by mdzcpa; 03-15-2005 at 06:01 AM.
9900k @ 5.1Ghz
Asus Maximus Hero XI
32GB (8 x 4) Gskill @4000
Strix 2080 Ti OC
OS & Apps: Samsung 970 Pro 512GB
Games: Samsung 970 Pro 1TB
Storage: Crucial M500 2TB
Seasonic Platinum 1000W
Phanteks Evolv X
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks