Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234
Results 76 to 95 of 95

Thread: SuperPi32m 5GHz & 4GHz Z97 Haswell ( Refresh ) All Out Challenge!

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    PI in the face
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    3,083
    Quote Originally Posted by TaPaKaH View Post
    Might be a mistread. When I set 4 on ASUS and use ASRock software, it reads 3.
    Do you believe in magic?

    https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/...Z97OCF012c.rar

    Me neither :P
    Quote Originally Posted by L0ud View Post
    So many opinions and so few screenshots

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Athens,Greece
    Posts
    225
    If you don't install MEI or something related it shows 3 iirc from z87 days...

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    22
    sergmann - 5:58:031 - 49x102 - 1428.9 MHz - 9-12-12-16-108-1 - Z97 OCF - G.Skill TridentX 2x4GB/Samsung - 2.06v - CPU/Water+Mem/Air


  4. #4
    take me to the manbar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    South Africa :)
    Posts
    1,179
    great run serg

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    1,246
    Alex-Ro - 5:56:375 - 49x102.1 - 1497.9 MHz - 9-12-12-18-108-1 - ASUS MAXIMUS VII IMPACT - Corsair Vengeance PRO 2x4GB/Samsung - 2.35v - CPU/Water,Mem/Air



    Same subs as before,just forgot to open utility

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    18
    very nice run ALexyour hch9 is under cold ???

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Romania
    Posts
    1,246
    No,air@15 degrees Celsius.

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Posts
    18
    next time put a timming configurator with your screen NJ!

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    22
    PSC Test with LN2

    sergmann - 5:56:469 - 50x100 - 1333 MHz - 6-10-6-24-64-1T - Z97 OCF - Mach Xtreme 2x2GB - 2.16v - CPU/LN2+Mem/LN2





  10. #10
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    363
    Little update,little waza used here

    bullant - 5:54:828 - 42x119.1 - 1429.2 MHz - 6-10-6-24-64-1 - Z97 OCF - GSkill Pis 2000 cl6 - 2.26v - LN2 -160

    Last edited by bullant; 10-18-2014 at 11:33 PM.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    2,018
    1429 6-10-6 is the new standard now

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    363
    Quote Originally Posted by TaPaKaH View Post
    1429 6-10-6 is the new standard now
    Yeah mate ahah

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    BIOS
    Posts
    68
    nfszocker - 5:57:594 - 48x104.1 - 1457.8 MHz - 9-12-12-18-108-1 - Z97 OCF - G.Skill TridentX 2x4GB/Samsung - 2.22v - CPU/Water+Mem/Air


  14. #14
    that ocer from gen z
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Tuscaloosa, AL
    Posts
    22
    Bit of a thread Necro, as is usual for me, but I think I'll be posting some results here in not too long. Have some PSC and BDBG on hand, and some BBSE on the way.

  15. #15
    that ocer from gen z
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Tuscaloosa, AL
    Posts
    22

    Round 1: Go!

    TheHoof - 5:59:000 - 50x100 - 2800 MHz - 9-12-12-14-104-1 - ASRock Z97 OC Formula - G.Skill TridentX 2400C9 2x4GB/S2D - 1.96v bios/1.955v HWiNFO - AIO CPU/stock mem

    Long time no see! Finally getting back to testing again
    A hair under 300ms behind PB with the older hardware, suspect bios (which is 2.00, not 1.80) or just 4790K is the cause for the time penalty
    Really hope it isn't the latter, because I have a much stronger chip and would like to use it for screens here.
    Not sure if core or IMC but these core clocks are not stable through Aida mem bandwidth tests :/
    Last edited by TheHoof; 11-07-2023 at 12:49 PM.

  16. #16
    that ocer from gen z
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Tuscaloosa, AL
    Posts
    22

    Round 2: Go!

    TheHoof - 5:58:656 - 50x100 - 2800 MHz - 9-12-12-14-104-1 - ASRock Z97 OC Formula - G.Skill TridentX 2400C9 2x4GB/S2D - 2.1vdimm - air CPU/stock mem

    It's been a while, y'all! Good to be back! Been having a lot of hardware struggles over the past year or so. Finally found a reliable motherboard/CPU/mem pairing. Had to recreate and retune my OS to beat my PB from a while ago. If anyone needs a copy of it for testing, feel free to shoot me a message wherever you know me
    Found a QE6S from China, already seems good without delid. It'll pass with lower volts but I didn't minimize for reliability's sake. Hoping that I can get one of my CPUs to do 50/50 on air, though I think that'll need a 4790k I haven't posted here yet.
    Scores still seem kinda inconsistent, especially with anything other than this Samsung profile. I'll get it figured out though, I have a metric ton of memory to bin.
    Last edited by TheHoof; 11-07-2023 at 12:45 PM.

  17. #17
    3D Team Captain Don_Dan's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    4,199
    Well done, thanks for posting!

    Quote Originally Posted by chew* View Post
    You can never have enough D9's.

  18. #18
    that ocer from gen z
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Tuscaloosa, AL
    Posts
    22

    Round 3: Go!

    TheHoof - 5:58:406 - 50x100 - 2800 MHz - 9-12-12-14-104-1 - ASRock Z97 OC Formula - G.Skill TridentX 2400C9 2x4GB/S2D - 1.99vdimm - air CPU/stock mem

    Still a couple hundred ms off my goal, but still pretty solid! I'll take it. Moving on to 2860 next!

  19. #19
    that ocer from gen z
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Tuscaloosa, AL
    Posts
    22

    Round 4: Go!

    TheHoof - 5:57:906 - 49x102.1 - 2860 MHz - 9-12-12-14-104-1 - ASRock Z97 OC Formula - G.Skill TridentX 2400C9 2x4GB/S2D - 2.12vdimm - air CPU/stock mem

    Crazy that C-N was doing .375 with settings similar to this, wonder what I'm missing. Had some runs that looked like they'd be .7xx-.6xx. Also had some 2900 runs about halfway through that probably would've been .4xx, got more instability beyond 2.17vdimm.
    Base clock fluctuation is annoying. I need to set 99.9 to get 100, 102 to get 102.1, and it still fluctuates down.
    Last edited by TheHoof; 11-18-2023 at 01:44 PM. Reason: correcting

Page 4 of 4 FirstFirst 1234

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •