Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: LSI MegaRAID 9260-4i + 2x Marvell based Plextor - poor performance?

  1. #1
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    199

    LSI MegaRAID 9260-4i + 2x Marvell based Plextor - poor performance?

    Hello guys,

    I've got two LSI controllers on my desk 9260 and 9240. Decided to try 9260 first, but what concerns me is... I'm getting really poor speed compared to X79 chipset.

    I'm using 2 plextor drives: M5S and M5Pro. I know they're not equally fast, but for benching will do just right.

    Look at results vs Intel:



    X79 is better at 4K writes and completely destroys my 9260 in terms of 4k-64Thrd.

    Configuration:



    Could you help me with this one? I can provide screenshots of anything you need

    Regards

  2. #2
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    124
    With the M5S and M5P on the LSI9260
    In Device Manager, Disk Drives, then the array, then policies.
    Check the 'writing Cache policy' setting, if enabled disable it, reboot then test again.
    If disabled try enabling it.
    If you can't change it here, then do it with LSI MSM utility.

    Disabling seems to work best with SF based SSD's enabled seems to work better with some other SSD controllers.
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    Intel Core i5-3470T
    16GB 1333Mhz RAM
    PNY GeForce GTX470
    LSI 9266-8i CacheCade pro v2.0/fastpath
    IBM ServeRAID M5016
    IBM ServeRAID M1015 LSI SAS Controller (IR mode)
    4x 60GB OCZ Solid 3 SSDs
    6x Hitachi 2TB 7k2000 HDs

  3. #3
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    199
    Can not.

    "Windows could not change the write-caching setting for the device. Your device might not support this feature or changing the setting"

    EDIT: changed in MSM utility, reboot and benching.




    After setting "disk cache policy: disabled":

    seq: +100 MB/s read, -600 MB/s write
    4k: -2 MB/s, -15 MB/s
    4k-64thrd: -20 MB/s, -50 MB/s

    :/
    Last edited by c22; 12-08-2012 at 07:06 PM. Reason: added results

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    124
    Write speeds are terrible.

    In MSM:
    Writeback is 'Always on' ?
    Have a play with Read ahead and Cached IO as well
    ASUS P8Z77 WS
    Intel Core i5-3470T
    16GB 1333Mhz RAM
    PNY GeForce GTX470
    LSI 9266-8i CacheCade pro v2.0/fastpath
    IBM ServeRAID M5016
    IBM ServeRAID M1015 LSI SAS Controller (IR mode)
    4x 60GB OCZ Solid 3 SSDs
    6x Hitachi 2TB 7k2000 HDs

  5. #5
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    199
    I tried almost every single configuration and nothing gives me speeds that I wanted to see

  6. #6
    RAIDer
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    699
    If you want speed with ssd's , buy lsi pci-e 3.0 series

  7. #7
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Poland
    Posts
    199
    I doubt PCI-E 2.0 is any problem here :P It delivers solid 2 GB/s at x4 link so this is plenty, I just wanted to bump my random read/write speeds

  8. #8
    RAIDer
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    699
    Quote Originally Posted by c22 View Post
    I doubt PCI-E 2.0 is any problem here :P It delivers solid 2 GB/s at x4 link so this is plenty, I just wanted to bump my random read/write speeds
    The controller is the problem.
    Buy Areca 18xx series ir the new lsi pci-e 3.0 series for ssd speed.

    Isn't youre controller pci-e 2.0 x 8 ? Same as ibm 1015?
    And youre write back cache is not activated, that is for sure.
    Last edited by Nizzen; 12-11-2012 at 02:47 PM.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Redding, CA
    Posts
    7
    What stripe size was used on the LSI volume and on the Intel/X79 volume?

    LSI documentation on benching.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Athens -> Hellas
    Posts
    944
    Well, my 2x 128GB Crucial M4 on the same controller with Fastpath gave the performance that follows....



    NoReadAhead-WriteThrough-DirectIO-DiskCacheEnabled 128K stripe LSIFW-12120-0073 - 2120183-1415

    I thinik you should secure erase and retest

    EDIT :

    This one is same settings but 105MHz PCI-E (and it's the same AMD setup with above)


  11. #11
    RAIDer
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    699
    Fastpath is helping the high QD.
    Thredstarter need it...

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •