Page 1 of 33 123411 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 812

Thread: AMD To Launch Radeon HD4890 "RV790" In April

  1. #1
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Posts
    3,247

    AMD To Launch Radeon HD4890 "RV790" In April

    AMD is slated to launch the Radeon HD 4890 card based on the RV790 core in April not the rumored Radeon HD 4970. The RV790XT A11 sample is running at 850Mhz core at 1.3V and 975Mhz GDDR5 memory. In comparision, a Radeon HD 4870 (RV770) card runs at 750MHz core and 900MHz GDDR5 memory. AMD told their partners that RV790 is expected to be around 20% faster than the current Radeon HD 4870 RV770 card and will compete headon against the GeForce 285 GTX card. The pricing? Between US$199 to US$249.
    Source: VR-Zone

    Updated: RV790 is an OCed RV770?
    Last year AMD got a great turnaround with the help of RV770, but now it seems somewhat weak in front of NVIDIA GT200 Series. After NVIDIA’s partners pushed out their self-designed GeForce GTX260, the launch of GeForce GTX285 and GeForce GTX295 have made NVIDIA even more confident in this battle.

    What move will AMD take to fight back? RV790 has aroused interest from lots of people as well as 40nm RV740. According to our source, RV790 will be named as Radeon HD 4970, with core clock improved to 950MHz (compared with 750MHz on HD4870). The memory clock keeps unchanged as 900MHz (i.e.3600MHz GDDR5). Based on 55nm manufacturing process, RV790 will come with 800 stream processors just as RV770, not 960 ones as rumored.

    With massive 27% improvement of core clock, RV790 may target at GeForce GTX285. Maybe you would think AMD is confusing us on purpose like what they did to RV770, but the informer believe there won’t be much change in specs. The availability and pricing of RV790 are not disclosed yet, but hardware-info says it would be announced in April........
    Source:Expreview
    Last edited by onethreehill; 02-23-2009 at 08:06 PM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Posts
    2,788
    Only 20% faster than the 285... no way that will compete head on. Price maybe, but not for sheer performance. But I bet it will overclock like crazy!
    Asus Rampage II Gene | Core i7 920 | 6*2GB Mushkin 998729 | BFG GTX280 OCX | Auzentech X-Fi Forte | Corsair VX550
    —Life is too short to be bound by the moral, ethical and legal constraints imposed on us by modern day society.

  3. #3
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    1,905
    Quote Originally Posted by 003 View Post
    Only 20% faster than the 285... no way that will compete head on. Price maybe, but not for sheer performance. But I bet it will overclock like crazy!
    20% faster than 4870 - which would put it on par roughly with the 285 - the competition would obviously be on the price front.
    -


    "Language cuts the grooves in which our thoughts must move" | Frank Herbert, The Santaroga Barrier
    2600K | GTX 580 SLI | Asus MIV Gene-Z | 16GB @ 1600 | Silverstone Strider 1200W Gold | Crucial C300 64 | Crucial M4 64 | Intel X25-M 160 G2 | OCZ Vertex 60 | Hitachi 2TB | WD 320

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    TX, USA
    Posts
    308
    Would a 100Mhz core bump really increase performance by 20%? IIRC, the 4870 has plenty of memory bandwidth so bumping it up shouldn't help all that much.
    2600k@4.9Ghz 1.42V | Asrock Ext 3 Gen 3 | Custom H20 | 16GB PC3 1600 | 7970@1375/1600

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    1,346
    Quote Originally Posted by Elfear View Post
    Would a 100Mhz core bump really increase performance by 20%? IIRC, the 4870 has plenty of memory bandwidth so bumping it up shouldn't help all that much.
    There might be additional functional units and other tweaks.
    oh man

  6. #6
    Xtremely Hot Sauce
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    3,586
    Sounds interesting.

    My toys:
    Asus Sabertooth X58 | Core i7-950 (D0) | CM Hyper 212+ | G.Skill Sniper LV 12GB DDR3-1600 CL9 | GeForce GTX 670-2048MB | OCZ Agility 4 512GB, WD Raptor 150GB x 3 (RAID0), WD Black 1TB x 2 (RAID0) | XFX 650W CAH9 | Lian-Li PC-9F | Win 7 Pro x86-64
    Gigabyte EX58-UD3R | Core i7-920 (D0) | Stock HSF | G.Skill Sniper LV 4GB DDR3-1600 CL9 | Radeon HD 2600 Pro 512MB | WD Caviar 80GB IDE, 4TB x 2 (RAID5) | Corsair TX750 | XClio 188AF | Win 7 Pro x86-64
    Dell Dimension 8400 | Pentium 4 530 HT (E0) | Stock HSF | 1.5GB DDR2-400 CL3 | GeForce 8800 GT 256MB | WD Caviar 160GB SATA | Stock PSU | (Broken) Stock Case | Win Vista HP x86
    Little Dot DAC_I | Little Dot MK IV | Beyerdynamic DT-880 Premium (600 Ω) | TEAC AG-H300 MkIII | Polk Audio Monitor 5 Series 2's

  7. #7
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Posts
    1,356
    Certainly not unexpected. They are at least somewhat obligated to counter the 285.

    It will be interesting to see what is packed onboard other than the mhz bump.

  8. #8
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Posts
    117
    HD4890 has 800SP, core 850Mhz, mem 975 GDRAM 5, 20% faster !
    ha ha..
    When AMD had 64-bit and Intel had only 32-bit, they tried to tell the world there was no need for 64-bit. Until they got 64-bit.
    When AMD had IMC and Intel had FSB, they told the world "there is plenty of life left in the FSB" (actual quote, and yes, they had *math* to show it had more bandwidth). Until they got an IMC.
    When AMD had dual core and Intel had single core, they told the world that consumers don't need multi core. Until they got dual core.
    When intel was using MCM, they said it was a better solution than native dies. Until they got native dies. (To be fair, we knocked *unconnected* MCM, and still do, we never knocked MCM as a technology, so hold your flames.)
    by John Fruehe

  9. #9
    I am Xtreme zanzabar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    SF bay area, CA
    Posts
    15,871
    i wounder how long until the 740 (hopefully march) and 790x2
    5930k, R5E, samsung 8GBx4 d-die, vega 56, wd gold 8TB, wd 4TB red, 2TB raid1 wd blue 5400
    samsung 840 evo 500GB, HP EX 1TB NVME , CM690II, swiftech h220, corsair 750hxi

  10. #10
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lubbock, Texas
    Posts
    2,133
    rv790 is 40nm right? because this seems like it would be a pretty hot card. i thought the 4870 ran hot idk now.

  11. #11
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    290
    I don't see a 20% performance boost out of those specs either.

    I guess we'll see.

  12. #12
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Where the Cheese Heads Reside
    Posts
    2,173
    So I see a possible 13% increase with the clock speed going up. Other then that, you not much else in there to help it unless its driver driven what they expect to increase it the rest of the way.
    -=The Gamer=-
    MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
    8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
    Sapphire 7950 VaporX 1150/1500 w/ 1.2V/1.5V | 32C Idle / 64C Load | 2x 128Gig Crucial M4 SSD's
    BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
    -=The Server=-
    Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
    3 Gig PC2-6400 | 3x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 2x Samsung F4 2TB
    Heat

  13. #13
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    rv790 is 40nm right? because this seems like it would be a pretty hot card. i thought the 4870 ran hot idk now.
    With that little incy-weency cooler equivilent to what they stick on a Geforce 8600/9600 GT ;-)

    If you could stick a cooler equiv. to the 285's cooler on the 4780 I bet it would have load temps around 30-35c.

    Looking forward to this, I'm trying to make do on a 4850 atm.
    Smile

  14. #14
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Arizona, USA
    Posts
    1,700
    No way that 100mhz more core and 300mhz more on the memory will give 20% more.
    Which means, there is more than meets the eye.


    Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
    80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}

    CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
    GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump

  15. #15
    Xtreme 3D Team
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,499
    What if the core ran @ 900+ and the memory ran at 1000 or something...that would be sweet.
    Smile

  16. #16
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Arizona, USA
    Posts
    1,700
    I haven't got my 4870 1GB hooked up to my WC system yet, or I would try to get it up there.

    Anyone with a voltmodded 4870 1GB care to try this out, to tell us if there are improvements in the core?


    Core i7 920 D0 B-batch (4.1) (Kinda Stable?) | DFI X58 T3eH8 (Fed up with its' issues, may get a new board soon) | Patriot 1600 (9-9-9-24) (for now) | XFX HD 4890 (971/1065) (for now) |
    80GB X25-m G2 | WD 640GB | PCP&C 750 | Dell 2408 LCD | NEC 1970GX LCD | Win7 Pro | CoolerMaster ATCS 840 {Modded to reverse-ATX, WC'ing internal}

    CPU Loop: MCP655 > HK 3.0 LT > ST 320 (3x Scythe G's) > ST Res >Pump
    GPU Loop: MCP655 > MCW-60 > PA160 (1x YL D12SH) > ST Res > BIP 220 (2x YL D12SH) >Pump

  17. #17
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    1,374
    lulz 20% with those minimal changes, waiting on AMD marketing graphs ...
    ░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█▀▀ ░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
    ░█▀▀ ░█▀▀ ░█ ░█ ░░░░█▀▀ ░█▀█ ░█ ░█ ░░░
    ░▀▀▀ ░▀ ░░░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░░▀ ░░░▀░▀ ░▀ ░▀▀▀ ░

  18. #18
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    290
    I'm getting 835 core on my 1GB Dark Knight, and even that stays under 61C, I just don't have enough voltage and unfortunately none of the volt mods work for me or I'd test it out.

  19. #19
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    227
    Well if it is 20percent more performance the price is right
    "Fanbouyism is a disease we all carry but most have immune systems that keep it at bay. However when coupled with a bad dose of ignorance and Low IQ numbers, this disease can be accelerated out of control to boast insane amounts of irradic, Defensive, or Aggressive behaviour and unexplainable devotion to a product or label whether or not that item is truly deserving" -DR Ima Noober, June 1, 2003

    Asus P5QL-Pro
    Kinston HyperX 4x2 gigs 5-5-515@ 1120 mghz
    Q6600 - 3.33 GHZ
    2x Sapphire 4870 1 gig
    Galaxie 850 PSU- this thing rocks
    audigy 2zs gamer
    4x Freezones to cool Proc. Idle @ 10c- Full load @29c(soon to be 5x in my new twelve hundred case)
    Vista ultimate 64

  20. #20
    Xtreme Guru
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Vancouver, Canada
    Posts
    3,858
    If 20% is to be believed, there must be some difference in addition to the clockspeeds, plain and simple. More SP's, maybe radically new drivers..
    i5 750 4.20GHz @ NH-D14 | 8GB | P7P55DLE | 8800U | Indilinx SSD + Samsung F3 | HAF922 + CM750W
    Past: Q6600 @ 3.60 E6400 @ 3.60 | E6300 @ 3.40 | O165 @ 2.90 | X2 4400+ @ 2.80 | X2 3800+ @ 2.70 | VE 3200+ @ 2.80 | WI 3200+ @ 2.75 | WI 3000+ no IHS @ 2.72 | TBB 1700+ @ 2.60 | XP-M 2500+ @ 2.63 | NC 2800+ @ 2.40 | AB 1.60GHz @ 2.60
    Quote Originally Posted by CompGeek
    The US is the only country that doesn't use [nuclear weapons] to terrorize other countries. The US is based on Christian values, unlike any other country in the world. Granted we are straying from our Christian heritage, but we still have a freedom aimed diplomatic stance.

  21. #21
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Lansing, MI / London / Stinkaypore
    Posts
    1,788
    There's a big percentage that this is not RV770 at all.


    RV770 has gone to at least Revision A12. 790 must have some stuff changed inside to get back to a new revision slate (A10 and 11)
    Quote Originally Posted by radaja View Post
    so are they launching BD soon or a comic book?

  22. #22
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Barack Hussein Obama-Biden's Nation
    Posts
    1,084
    Yeah, I can recall the rumors of 960 shaders and 48 TMU's. It's a one-step increase, from 320 on a 3870, to 800 on 4870, and then 960 on a 4890 ( a 2:5:6 ratio). Same for 16 TMU's on 3870, 40 on 4870, and then 48 on 4890 (also a 2:5:6 ratio). It seems perfectly logical, and I think that if this were true, the claimed 20% performance increase would be an extremely modest one. The prices of $199-$249 are really exciting!

    The other thing I could think of are tighter latency timings for GDDR5 memory.. but that still would not be enough for 20% increase without adding more shaders/TMU's.. Another hint is that it's no longer a RV770, but rather a RV790XT!

    --two awesome rigs, wildly customized with
    5.1 Sony speakers, Stereo 3D, UV Tourmaline Confexia, Flame Bl00dr4g3 Fatal1ty
    --SONY GDM-FW900 24" widescreen CRT, overclocked to:
    2560x1600 resolution at 68Hz!(from 2304x1440@80Hz)

    Updated List of Video Card GPU Voodoopower Ratings!!!!!

  23. #23
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    川崎市
    Posts
    2,076
    Quote Originally Posted by roofsniper View Post
    rv790 is 40nm right? because this seems like it would be a pretty hot card. i thought the 4870 ran hot idk now.
    No, the 48x0 cards don't put out a lot of heat, amd just prevents the fan from spinning up to keep them silent which leads to high temps, you can try it out, make a profile in ccc, change fan speed in profilename.xml file to higher than default and the temps drop like crazy, so it would be possible to cool a higher clocked 48x0 at 55nm as well, they would just need to sacrifice some of the silence for it.

  24. #24
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    290
    Quote Originally Posted by naokaji View Post
    No, the 48x0 cards don't put out a lot of heat, amd just prevents the fan from spinning up to keep them silent which leads to high temps, you can try it out, make a profile in ccc, change fan speed in profilename.xml file to higher than default and the temps drop like crazy, so it would be possible to cool a higher clocked 48x0 at 55nm as well, they would just need to sacrifice some of the silence for it.
    That, and it's just not the most effective cooler. I posted this shot on another forum of my Asus 4870 DK card:



    All it takes is a decent heatsink and the card runs plenty cool.

  25. #25
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Skopje, Macedonia
    Posts
    1,716
    If it has 800SP's then it is going to be 8~13% faster depending on game and settings, sometimes maybe less. But if it has 1000SP's like numerous rumors were indicating then it is going to be up to 40% faster. So in such case 20% in average makes sense.

    Anyway, I won't believe in anything about the future ATi graphics cards until I have them in my hands.

Page 1 of 33 123411 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •