Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: 2x2 GB Crucial & 2 GB Buffalo value RAM OCing mini-review

  1. #1
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    714

    2x2 GB Crucial & 2 GB Buffalo value RAM OCing mini-review

    I saw some cheap value RAM in 2 GB dimms at a local store, & noticed that the Crucial was Micron D9FTB (Fatbodies, though not the awesome ones).
    And the Buffalo was actually PowerChips, basically the same stuff as most higher end 2x2 GB kits out there today.

    I did initial quick testing with Memtest86+, followed by HCI Memtest in Windows.
    I find that if you get past 25% in HCI Memtest, it's extremely likely to be very stable, as it's generally at least as sensitive as Memtest86+ is for reporting errors, & takes minutes to find issues vs. hours with Orthos or Prime95.

    Specs used for Testing:
    Q6700
    DFI UT P35-T2R
    Raptor 150 GB
    Corsair HX520
    Vista Ultimate x64



    Buffalo Select 2 GB DDR2-667
    PowerChips R1C889-AA3G
    This or very similar ICs are found in many of the 2x2 GB DDR2 kits out there presently.
    They clock well, generally without needing much voltage.





    Crucial 2x 2 GB DDR2-667
    Micron D9FTB
    These are Fatbodies (though not the infamous IC of yore)...didn't clock terribly well.
    I've seen results with very tight timings with these before, but i wasn't willing to put more than 2.25V into these, so i didn't get spectacular results.





    Onto the results...

    I didn't bother messing with subtimings, & actually deliberately left them very loose to keep them out of the equation.
    Voltages i did mess with, but i didn't spend tons of time trying for lowest possible vdimm.
    Just will show the results with reasonable voltage, though i have no doubt the PSC would have run with a lot less voltage, & the D9FTB would run even tighter timings with more voltage.


    Buffalo - PowerChips "R"type IC
    DDR2-800 4-4-3-12 2.08v
    DDR2-880 5-4-3-12 2.08v
    DDR2-1067 5-5-3-15 2.08v






    4-4-3 pretty much always gets as far as 4-4-4 from what i've tested on PSC, & same story here.
    Loosened to 5-4-3 & it did DDR2-900.
    Basically exactly how things are with my Mushkin actually, though the Mushkin does a bit farther for each of those timings.
    DDR2-1067 5-5-3 was pretty much the ceiling; dropping to 5-5-5 did not help getting further.
    Very nice for what's essentially crap value RAM IMO


    Crucial - Micron D9FTB
    DDR2-800 4-3-3-6 2.25v
    DDR2-885 4-4-3-12 2.25v





    You never get 4-3-3 @ DDR2-800 on PowerChips, so that was impressive.
    Couldn't get past there with those timings though, had to loosen to 4-4-3.
    Unfortunately, that was it!
    I basically hit a brick wall @ DDR2-900.
    Only way to get DDR2-900 stable was to run 5-6-6, which barely got any further either.
    I tried numerous different ratios too, & same brick wall.
    Seems this stuff is great for tight timings on 2 GB dimms, but only to pretty low speeds...then it just completely craps out.
    I will admit CAS 4 till DDR2-880 is nice...you rarely see 2 GB PSC capable of that.
    But needing 5-6-6 just to get DDR2-900 stable lol...


    Hope this little write-up was worth skimming through.
    Or even better if it inspires you to write up your own!
    Last edited by -n7-; 05-13-2008 at 12:02 AM.
    Gigabyte X58A-UD3R | i7 930 @ 4 GHz | Corsair H50
    G.Skill RipJaws 4x2 GB @ DDR3-1600 7-7-6-24-1N | HIS Radeon HD 5870
    3x Intel X25-M 80 GB RAID-0; OCZ Agility 120 GB | Samsung SH-S243D
    Corsair HX1000 | Dell 3007WFP & Samsung 204T | 7 Ultimate x64

  2. #2
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    360
    nice results on the buffalo @1066 and a resonable 24/7 voltage

    Crucial kind of sucky comparatively but OK.

    Thanks for the test.

  3. #3
    Xtreme X.I.P.
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Location
    Shipai
    Posts
    31,147
    weee those fatbodies suck :P
    nice mini review dude!

  4. #4
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Grinchville Embassy; Santa Cruz, Aruba
    Posts
    599
    so microns suck in 2gb sticks?





    Q9450 @3.60 Ghz, Striker II Formula, Evga 9800GTX (863/2050/1200), 2X2gb 1100 5,5,5,18 D9's at 2.20V
    Cooled by: MCR320, D-Tek Fuzion V2, MCP335 w/ EK G3/8 TOPS, Full BP high flow 1/2" fittings
    Oh and Vista Ultimate (i know, I KNOW!)

  5. #5
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    IL
    Posts
    1,948
    considering the timings and the Crucial is PC5300 I wouldn't say it sux'd. I think Micron Fatties have their place . Powerchips tend to scale nice though
    it's never fast enough!

  6. #6
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
    Posts
    714
    Quote Originally Posted by JNav89GT View Post
    considering the timings and the Crucial is PC5300 I wouldn't say it sux'd. I think Micron Fatties have their place . Powerchips tend to scale nice though
    Yup.

    Different Micron ICs have different strengths.

    D9FTB seems to love voltage, & can do tighter timings than PowerChips , but can't do good speeds at all.

    It's also a discontinued IC though, so it's not like it'll be found in much.
    Most likely it's thrown into these Crucials to be cleared out, whatever is left anyway.

    PSC is easily king for 2 GB dimms these days, as basically every good 2 GB dimm sports PowerChips.
    Gigabyte X58A-UD3R | i7 930 @ 4 GHz | Corsair H50
    G.Skill RipJaws 4x2 GB @ DDR3-1600 7-7-6-24-1N | HIS Radeon HD 5870
    3x Intel X25-M 80 GB RAID-0; OCZ Agility 120 GB | Samsung SH-S243D
    Corsair HX1000 | Dell 3007WFP & Samsung 204T | 7 Ultimate x64

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •