Does it?
Anyone know clock for clock performance of c2d Penryn vs c2d?
Does it?
Anyone know clock for clock performance of c2d Penryn vs c2d?
i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz
Fast computers breed slow, lazy programmers
The price of reliability is the pursuit of the utmost simplicity. It is a price which the very rich find most hard to pay.
http://www.lighterra.com/papers/modernmicroprocessors/
Modern Ram, makes an old overclocker miss BH-5 and the fun it was
perhaps they should say faster than "...[insert something that is 40% slower]..."
i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz
http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post...ance-sse4.html
Intel®CoreTM2 Extreme processor QX6800 (8MB L2, 2.93 GHz, 1066 FSB)
vs
45nm Hi-k Intel®quad core processor (12MB L2, 3.33 GHz, 1333 FSB)
13.5% higher clockspeed + 50% more cache. obviously the clock for clock comparison will depend on the application. The 45nm processor alone is supposed to increase clock for clock performance 20% though.
DivX* 6.6 Alpha with VirtualDub1.7.1 (time in seconds –lower is better) - 211% quicker
Half-Life* 2 build 2707 - 41% quicker
Cinebench* R9.5 - 25% quicker
MainConcept* H.264 Encoder v2.1 - 20% quicker
Photoshop* CS2 - 15% quicker
-------------------------------------------------
Some of you that responded to this thread knew what the benchmarks were but didnt feel like linking them for him...
Last edited by zabomb4163; 04-18-2007 at 03:27 PM.
If it makes CSS faster by 40% I'll buy one... god I hate CSS framerates on publics
Core 2 Quad Q6600 @ 3GHz . DFI DK P45-T2RS Plus . XFX 9800GT 512MB . 8GB OCZ Blade PC2-9200 . WD6400AAKS AHCI .
Creative X-Fi XtremeMusic . Hanns.G 28" LCD . Thermalright U120-E . Seasonic S12 600w . Windows 7 Professional E Retail x64 .
40% faster than Conroe at higher clock, 2.93GHz vs 3.33GHz is what Intel used in the benchmarks. In addition theres a bigger cache and higher bus speed + some other important or not important improvements, and it could possible be something extra in the EDAT-thing, theres no saying that this Penryn will not speed up to for example 3.66GHz when running singlethreaded apps.
Check the news section for more on this.
BadAxe2, WC'ed L631B115 Xeon3060 3.4GHz 1.27v summer OC, 2GB BallistiX 4:5,
2x250GB-16 Raid-0 + 400GB-16, 7900GTO 512MB, Acer 22" Wide, Nexus 500W.
Gigabyte Z68X UD7
Intel Core i7 2600K (testing)
16GB Mushkin Redline 17000 2133 1.65v
EK, 3x120 Rad 2xMCP655
Acer 1200w PSU
2-128GB Samsung SSD RAID 0
2-1TB Seagete 32mb RAID 0
1-1TB Western Digital
1- Plextor PX-B320SA Blue Ray
1- Plextor PX-880SA 24x DVD/RW
2- EVGA Nvidia GTX-480 SLI
LG 30", Hanns G 28"
Rig:
Q6600
Intel BadAxe2
Tuniq 120 Tower
G.Skill HZ 4x1GB
BFG 7900 GS OC (558/675) now MSI HD 7770
WD Raptor 150GB (Primary)
2 x Seagate 320Gb 7200.10 (Storage; No RAID)
Corsair 620Watt
Samsung SH-W183 SATA drive
AuzenTech X-Meridian
Antec A900 Case
I have a Tuniq 120 Tower in my new pc. The size, in relation to others on the market, is directly proportional to the size of my penis. Therefore it is large.
and thick.
..and when it is clocked at 2.93...how about then?45nm Hi-k Intel®quad core processor (12MB L2, 3.33 GHz, 1333 FSB)
...not saying it's not an improvement but a small one only for now i think.
Last edited by adamsleath; 04-18-2007 at 05:56 PM.
i7 3610QM 1.2-3.2GHz
nope they lied ...
not in 3D Games ...
in Video Encoding Apps ... yes, but not in 3d games
E6600 @ 3.6
IN9 32x MAX
EVGA 8800Ultra
750W
without evidence thats slander. The core duo benchmarks were difficult to believe before they actually hit retail. Look up what people said about the benchmarks floating around. I dont see any reason to doubt the benchmarks this time around. You should really read some more about the 45nm changes. They were a lot more than just a die shrink.
Rig:
Q6600
Intel BadAxe2
Tuniq 120 Tower
G.Skill HZ 4x1GB
BFG 7900 GS OC (558/675) now MSI HD 7770
WD Raptor 150GB (Primary)
2 x Seagate 320Gb 7200.10 (Storage; No RAID)
Corsair 620Watt
Samsung SH-W183 SATA drive
AuzenTech X-Meridian
Antec A900 Case
I have a Tuniq 120 Tower in my new pc. The size, in relation to others on the market, is directly proportional to the size of my penis. Therefore it is large.
and thick.
When's the actual release of it?
i7 920 D0
Asus P6T Deluxe V2
6GB OCZ Reaper PC3-1500
XFX 4980 1GB
Audigy X-FI music
silencer 610w
Water cooled with HAF 932 case
Is Penryn s775? Is it compatible with exisiting chipsets (i.e. 965x and 975x chipsets)
Not a Dell.
It seems so, and it will work on existing chipsets, the problem is existing VRMs on the motherboards.
Some say you will need a new board for a Penryn for the same reason you needed a new one for Conroe.
Member of Overclockers.com Folding @ Home team
"<The_Coolest> you can't unwaste wasted CPU cycles" - Start FOLDing now!
Main rig:
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X / Mobo: Asrock Fatal1ty X470 / EVO 970 500GB + WD Blue 250GB + HDD / GPU: Dell RX 570 4GB / Mem: 2x16GB DDR4-3200 G.Skill 32GTZKW TridentZ - 32GB total / PSU: Seasonic Prime Ultra Gold 650W
Secondary rigs:
Core i7 2600K 3.4GHz @ 4.3GHz (Scythe Mugen2) / Mobo: Biostar TP67XE / 2x Inland Pro 120GB / GPU: HD5450 / Mem: 4x4GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 8GBXL RipJawsX - 16GB total / PSU: Seasonic S12II 620W.
Core i3 540 3.06GHz @ 4.0GHz (Freezer 7 Pro) / Mobo: MSI H55M-ED55 / GPU: Integrated / Mem: 4x2GB DDR3-1600 G.Skill 4GBRL RipJaws - 8GB total / PSU: Antec 380W.
Core Temp - Accurate temperature monitor for Intel's Core/Core 2 and AMD64 processors
Bookmarks