I'd really recommend 2GB or more for an honest reading. Your summits can't do 450 MB/s each.
I'd really recommend 2GB or more for an honest reading. Your summits can't do 450 MB/s each.
Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.
Rule 1A:
Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.
Rule 2:
When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.
Rule 2A:
When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.
Rule 3:
When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.
Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!
Random Tip o' the Whatever
You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.
just messin'
2x vraptors in R0 (really) short stroked.
PC-A04 | Z68MA-ED55 | 2500k | 2200+ XPG | 7970 | 180g 520 | 2x1t Black | X3 1000w
I did just got my Intel x25-M GEN2 80GB today
AS SSD Benchmark
2X Intel 25-M GN2 RAID0 ICH10R
3 Intel X25-M 80GB G2 SSD Raid-0
Last edited by demo23019; 03-29-2010 at 02:35 PM.
3x X25-M 80g in raid0 on ICH10R
acard ans9010
16gb size sata 2 interfece
well a ramdrive formed in an atom platform
so if you make it anywhere else make this number x2 :-)
x3 in the i7 platform thought
This any good for 2 drives raid 0?
I would have replied sooner but the compression explosion device in my motion traction system needed to be replenished with distillation fractionation of fossilisation extraction....
(a SoddemFX original)
Classified 760A1 (49)
980X
CMG4GX3M2A2000C8 12g
EVGA GTX 295
Syncmaster 305t
XM25-MG2 160 X2 Raid 0
300G Raptors X2 Raid1
Galaxy 1000w
Win 7 Ultimate
800D 120.3 & 120.2 HeatKiller, Bitspower and MIPS
Here is my 2 300gb WD Raptors in raid 0 using onboard intel controler. Was using 8.6 drivers during this test.
This is my 4 Super Talent Master Drives in Raid 0 (Highpoint 4320 controller)
This is 2 Fujitsu 26Gb 10k 2.5" SAS drive using onboard sas controller in raid 0
This is just a single Fujitsu 36gb 10k 2.5" sas drive using onboard sas controller
New Rig in Development
Current Rig: i7 950 (HK 3.0 CU Block) : ASUS WS (Koolance Blocks) : eVGA 295 GTX CO-OP (Swiftech Full card Block) : 6GB Corsair Dominator XMP memory : Highpoint 4320 raid card : 4x 128Gb SuperTalent MasterDrive SX's (Raid 0) - OS : 2x 300GB WD Raptors (Raid 0) - Caching Drive : D5 pump with Bitpower top running to 360 rad for CPU & MB : MCP355 with XPSC Res Top to 120mm rad for GPU
Here are some ATTO of my drives
60GB Vertex Rurbo (onboard intel controller with new trim supported driver) Purchased 5 of these and will be running a Raid 0 with them on new rig for my apps/games drive
ATTO of the 2 300gb raptors in raid 0 (onboard intel)
And here is the ATTO of my 4 128GB Super Talent SSDs on the highpoint controller
Atto of 100gb Veretex LE drive (Onboard intel controller)
Here is the AS of my Vertex LE 100GB drive (On the onboard intel controller)
New Rig in Development
Current Rig: i7 950 (HK 3.0 CU Block) : ASUS WS (Koolance Blocks) : eVGA 295 GTX CO-OP (Swiftech Full card Block) : 6GB Corsair Dominator XMP memory : Highpoint 4320 raid card : 4x 128Gb SuperTalent MasterDrive SX's (Raid 0) - OS : 2x 300GB WD Raptors (Raid 0) - Caching Drive : D5 pump with Bitpower top running to 360 rad for CPU & MB : MCP355 with XPSC Res Top to 120mm rad for GPU
Brand New: 64 GB PCIe SSD in raid0
I'll try booting on this later...
jk...
It's actually 16 x 4GB FB-DIMM in raid0...
jk again...
I cheated... it's just a ramdrive...
Main Machine:
AMD FX8350 @ stock --- 16 GB DDR3 @ 1333 MHz --- Asus M5A99FX Pro R2.0 --- 2.0 TB Seagate
Miscellaneous Workstations for Code-Testing:
Intel Core i7 4770K @ 4.0 GHz --- 32 GB DDR3 @ 1866 MHz --- Asus Z87-Plus --- 1.5 TB (boot) --- 4 x 1 TB + 4 x 2 TB (swap)
My intel x25-m G2 80gb (2 days old :P )
AS SSD:
Crystal Disc Mark 3.0 x64:
HD TUNE:
Last edited by Sesto Sento; 05-07-2010 at 05:31 AM.
_____________________
Intel Core i5 2500k @ 5ghz (50*100)
MSI P67A-GD55 B3
GSKILL 8gb GBNT
2x Sapphire HD 6870 1gb Crossfire X
Corsair HX 850
Corsair H7O
1xIntel X25-M G2 80 gb (OS)/ 2xSamsung Spinpoint f3 1Tb RAID 0 (Games)/ 2xWestern Digital 2Tb (Storage)/ 1xSamsung Story 1,5Tb (Storage)
LG W2286L-PF
Monsters Game - The Battle Between Vampires & Warewolf's MMORPG
Some Areca 1680ix numbers!
How many ssd's and what controller? bit over kill :P, i know its areca but which version?
Another thing I find funny is AMD/Intel would snipe any of our Moms on a grocery run if it meant good quarterly results, and you are forever whining about what feser did?
I just took 2 x Samsung F3 500GB (HD502HJ) and made my first RAID.
Decided to go for a Matrix RAID (two partitions on two drives, first two partitions = RAID 0 and second two partitions = RAID 1). Best of both worlds with only two HDDs.
RAID 0 - Write Cache Enabled
Impressive bench but really not as big of a performance boost as I expected.
Especially since this was the bench from my previous HDD:
Transfer Rate Minimum : 31.4 MB/sec
Transfer Rate Maximum : 64.7 MB/sec
Transfer Rate Average : 58.0 MB/sec
Access Time : 16.5 ms
Burst Rate : 102.5 MB/sec
CPU Usage : -1.0%
Last edited by trentlad; 08-03-2010 at 10:20 AM.
What do those real big spike drops represent in the bench directly above??
When I didn't have 'write cache' enabled it looked really clean, here's the pre-write cache bench:
Last edited by trentlad; 08-03-2010 at 10:27 AM.
Bookmarks