bought new BH-5!

[Sup3rman]

I just received same KHX3200K2/512 today that I bought new for $85.00 plus $7.85 shipping.

It's working good, I'm running it at 295FSB x 9 @166 2-2-5 and I can pass Spi 32m.

Everyone said you can't buy new BH-5, your wrong.

[Dissolved]

pics?


295fsb@166 whats the point in that?

[conrad.maranan]

Around 236MHz...that's average. Fair price for 512MB, though.

[EnJoY]

Why not try some 1:1 action. That stuff should fly past 250fsb with 3.2volts or more.

[Sup3rman]

I was trying to get a good SuperPi #.
My 3200 winchester seems to like the 9 better than 10 multiplier.
For some reason I get better results with the 9 multi and ram @ 166. I was able to do SuperPi 1M 30s for the first time.

What do you want pictures of?

[EnJoY]

I want pics of your highest 1:1 oc, at whatever cpu multi you want...make it 6x for highest possible mem oc.

[VetteTheHeretic]

i coulda swore BH-5 came as PC-3500, what voltage are you using?

[jumanji969]

i coulda swore BH-5 came as PC-3500, what voltage are you using?

It used to come as everything... PC-3200, PC-3000, PC-3500...

[Sup3rman]

I want pics of your highest 1:1 oc, at whatever cpu multi you want...make it 6x for highest possible mem oc.

not bad for $90?

[conrad.maranan]

Not bad at all, especially for $92.85.

[viccyran]

not bad for $90?

how many volts are you throwing at that? nice

[TEDY]

where did you get it

[NiSMo]

very nice indeed, how many volts is goin through that ram? has it passed memtest etc?

[Sup3rman]

how many volts are you throwing at that? nice

3.7v

where did you get it

Compuvest "Item 311003690-00"



I was very skeptical but it work out for me.

they also have 2X512 but that was $275.00,
1GB DDR PC3200 (2x512mb) 400MHz 184pin Kingston KHX3200K21G
SKU: 311001163-02

[bachus_anonym]

they look like great sticks, Sup3rman..... push'em hard

just a little something to get you on the right path.... 2x256MB @ 273x10 6-2-2-2.0-1T.
Remember - BH-5 still RULEZ

[blinky]

Compuvest "Item 311003690-00"

link plz

[MaxxxRacer]

some really nice results.. almost seems that i should have gotten some bh5 instead of my tccd. But hopefully I will be able to run my tccd at 300 when i get a new cpu.

[gundamit]

link plz

I can't find KHX3200512 sticks on the Compuvest site. Item number given does not come up in search on site. "A" version is available.

[bachus_anonym]

some really nice results.. almost seems that i should have gotten some bh5 instead of my tccd. But hopefully I will be able to run my tccd at 300 when i get a new cpu.

I have a feeling that DDR600 on TCCD is not going to be enough to beat DDR540 out of BH-5.....

EDIT: I'm thinking of getting Gskill PC4800 LA 2x256 and see how it goes....

EDIT 2: I would love to someone compare BH-5 @ DDR540 with TCCD 8-3-3-2.5-1T @ DDR600... Some SuperPi 16M, 3D action an maybe some games....

[Sup3rman]

I can't find KHX3200512 sticks on the Compuvest site. Item number given does not come up in search on site. "A" version is available.

I would just call them and ask about availability, give them them the part # 31100690-00 for 2x256 $85.00 or 311001163-02 for 2x512 $275.00

[charlie]

BH-5 still has it's place, obviously....
However, Winchester is best buddies with tccd. You see.... 9 x 300, 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3 is faster than 9 x 300, 5:4 @ 2-2-2. Now 10 x 270, 1:1 2-2-2 is faster than BOTH of them....
When you get Winchester's cranked up to near 3g's, though.... the 9x and 10x multi's become useless with BH-5, though... and to get a 3500+ pushed north of 3100mHz, BH-5 is out of the equation, too.
What we REALLY need is a good TCCD vs. BH-5 FX-55 comparison....

11 x 270 = 2970, 1:1 @ 2-2-2
vs.
9 x 333 = 2990, 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3

or on the NF4 it seems we may be able to run our G.Skill LA/LE tccd up to near 350.....

[Sup3rman]

You see.... 9 x 300, 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3 is faster than 9 x 300, 5:4 @ 2-2-2.

Is 9 x 300, 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3 still faster than 9 x 300, 5:4 @ 2-2-2 after useing A64Tweaker with CodeRed's setting?

[enzoR]

i dotn think so.

[charlie]

Is 9 x 300, 1:1 @ 2.5-3-3 still faster than 9 x 300, 5:4 @ 2-2-2 after useing A64Tweaker with CodeRed's setting?

Well, of course you use the A64 Tweaker on both and 300 is faster than 240. But why stop at 300....tccd is good for MORE.

C

[Sup3rman]

Isn't thier greater gain in performance when using A64Tweaker on BH-5 @ 2-2-2?

Also at 9 x 300/166 is memory @ 246

I would think BH-5 @ 246 2-2-2 is more command and stable than TDDC @ 300 2.5-3-3

TDDC over 300 seem exotic where as BH-5 @ 245-255 average.