Page 30 of 42 FirstFirst ... 202728293031323340 ... LastLast
Results 726 to 750 of 1028

Thread: NVIDIA GTX 595 (picture+Details)

  1. #726
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Quote Originally Posted by Mad Pistol View Post
    Would anyone here seriously consider that a bad thing?
    Well it isnt a good thing. It means CPUs are badly underutilized. We should be aiming for 60 FPS @ 800x600 with three or four CPU cores maxed out. At that point our CPUs will be properly utilized. Then we can just bump up resolution from there depending on the graphics card.

  2. #727
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Orelia
    Posts
    316
    A hypothetical situation -
    Intel buys the unlimited detail technology. After a bit more R&D combining this new tech with their current efforts with dabbling in graphics card design and manufacturing, Intel bring their 'graphics card' to the market bringing forth CPU tech to the GCard sector rather than vice versa in combination with the massive benefits of Unlimited Detail.

    Is it me or would something like this pwn the market?

    Add me on Facebook
    -=<#*!! 5OUnD PHr33K !!*#>=-

  3. #728
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    272
    Lastest news:

    Asus GTX590, European prices

    799 EUR

    Starting to sell tomorrow!
    Confirmed by the owner of the store i use to buy stuff to...

    Wayyyyy to expensive .... 6990 will own this ... 200 Euros difference is way too much of a difference...
    Oh...your ass is grass and I've got the weed-whacker.

  4. #729
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Posts
    3,691
    Quote Originally Posted by SabreWulf69 View Post
    A hypothetical situation -
    Intel buys the unlimited detail technology. After a bit more R&D combining this new tech with their current efforts with dabbling in graphics card design and manufacturing, Intel bring their 'graphics card' to the market bringing forth CPU tech to the GCard sector rather than vice versa in combination with the massive benefits of Unlimited Detail.

    Is it me or would something like this pwn the market?
    John Carmack has already touched on the ability to handle unlimited geometry and has stated that their next engine will revolve around this after idtech 5. No point in buyin this one out considering John already began work on said engine and when combined with the insane texturing ability of idtech 5 it'll easily blow the "unlimited detail" engine out of the water anyway...
    Quote Originally Posted by Leon2ky
    "dammit kyle what's with the 30 second sex lately?" "Sorry sweetie, I overclocked my nuts and they haven't been stable since"
    Quote Originally Posted by trinibwoy View Post
    I don't think his backside has internet access.
    Quote Originally Posted by n00b 0f l337 View Post
    Hey I just met you
    And this is crazy
    But I'm on bath salts
    And your face looks tasty

  5. #730
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    514

  6. #731
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    272
    make sure that's not a single pcb GTX295 design ... it was very similar
    Oh...your ass is grass and I've got the weed-whacker.

  7. #732
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    312
    Im pretty sure its not because of the Fan-sink plate on the PCB.
    My rig the Kill-Jacker

    CPU: AMD Phenom II 1055T 3.82GHz
    Mobo: ASUS Crosshair IV Extreme
    Game GPU: EVGA GTX580
    Secondary GPU 2: EVGA GTX470
    Memory: Mushkin DDR3 1600 Ridgeback 8GB
    PSU: Silverstone SST-ST1000-P
    HDD: WD 250GB Blue 7200RPM
    HDD2: WD 1TB Blue 7200RPM
    CPU Cooler: TRUE120 Rev. B Pull
    Case: Antec 1200


    FAH Tracker V2 Project Site

  8. #733
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    743
    Quote Originally Posted by Pillo-kun View Post
    can you please post your source on that, about SB getting double fps in battlefield than a 775 quad? bad company 2 i presume.
    Quote Originally Posted by Mad Pistol View Post
    http://www.guru3d.com/article/core-i...600k-review/21 plus this: http://www.overclock.net/intel-gener...4-955-3-a.html

    Sorry to say, but that statement is false. The framerate is virtually identical. At that level, you're GPU limited. Even with an HD 6990 or GTX 590, you're still going to have some limitations. There's no doubt that an i7 2600k is faster than a Phenom II X4 @ 4Ghz or a similar Core 2 Quad, but when you're arguing that a faster CPU will benefit the gaming experience, in this case, I just don't see how that can be possible. I mean, even when the CPU is the limitation at 1024x768, BC2 is still chucking out 90+ FPS on a Phenom II quad core. As soon as you move up one more level to 1280x1024 or 1600x900, the CPU is no longer an issue. Would anyone here seriously consider that a bad thing?

    Those tests were done with a GTX 580, too. No way that thing could be considered a bottleneck.
    This is on multi player http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1592732

    Time to upgrade your cpu? Not saying either of your links is incorrect although the first one is a canned benchmark. The multi player is more cpu intensive.
    You be the judge.
    Last edited by kadozer; 03-21-2011 at 09:08 AM.

  9. #734
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Italia
    Posts
    1,021
    Quote Originally Posted by cold2010 View Post
    surry but this is a 295 single pcb...

    http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforc...e-pcb-review/5

  10. #735
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Posts
    399
    Quote Originally Posted by Andrea deluxe View Post
    surry but this is a 295 single pcb...

    http://www.guru3d.com/article/geforc...e-pcb-review/5
    Agreed, everything looks alike - the cutout of the heatsink fins to make room for a side power supply, the three screw spots, the back plate not covering the middle of the card....

    The linked site even mentionons it's a GTX295 in the middle frame! Scam attempt or weak trolling?

  11. #736
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by Postmodum View Post
    Lastest news:

    Asus GTX590, European prices

    799 EUR

    Starting to sell tomorrow!
    Confirmed by the owner of the store i use to buy stuff to...

    Wayyyyy to expensive .... 6990 will own this ... 200 Euros difference is way too much of a difference...
    Ok, now I give you the reason

    I hope that GTX 590 is much better than HD6990. Otherwise, it doesn't make sense buying the GTX 590

  12. #737
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    11
    Here's the *real* GTX 590 compared to a HD6990


  13. #738
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    514
    Very small

  14. #739
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Brazil
    Posts
    580
    will it launch tomorrow or thursday?

  15. #740

  16. #741
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by Postmodum View Post
    Lastest news:

    Asus GTX590, European prices

    799 EUR

    Starting to sell tomorrow!
    Confirmed by the owner of the store i use to buy stuff to...

    Wayyyyy to expensive .... 6990 will own this ... 200 Euros difference is way too much of a difference...
    Well, I just saw an GTX 590 with a price of 825 in other European shop... Really expensive for a vga

  17. #742
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,870
    Well nVidia will win points with people who value aesthetics.

  18. #743
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Past
    Posts
    447
    I must say im impressed with engineering on this one.
    It has 2 much bigger,potentially more power hungry chips which use wider bus.And they were able to cramp it to much smaller space.
    Way to go Nv!

  19. #744
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    3,012
    that game looks worse and worse all the time. it's really to bad to be honest... so much hope and potential lost...

    but to the card. I'm liking the look of it so far. I also am loving the whole fact that it is WAY smaller then a 6990... to be honest I have no idea how they pulled that off considering a GTX 580 is not a small card. also it just looks a whole lot better. the real test however will be overclocking. If it can hit 800mhz it will be a real winner...
    CPU: Intel Core i7 3930K @ 4.5GHz
    Mobo: Asus Rampage IV Extreme
    RAM: 32GB (8x4GB) Patriot Viper EX @ 1866mhz
    GPU: EVGA GTX Titan (1087Boost/6700Mem)
    Physx: Evga GTX 560 2GB
    Sound: Creative XFI Titanium
    Case: Modded 700D
    PSU: Corsair 1200AX (Fully Sleeved)
    Storage: 2x120GB OCZ Vertex 3's in RAID 0 + WD 600GB V-Raptor + Seagate 1TB
    Cooling: XSPC Raystorm, 2x MCP 655's, FrozenQ Warp Drive, EX360+MCR240+EX120 Rad's

  20. #745
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Inside a floppy drive
    Posts
    366
    Size is perfect for my tiny case, looks like it have the same length of a GTX 580. Is the price confirmed (799€)?

  21. #746
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Switzerland
    Posts
    1,972
    ho ho nice size ...

    ( im just a bit worry of the trace... all pieces around the 2 cores should be really close of them... we can see the 2 vapor chambers ( copper ) the only space between is the fan size.. )
    CPU: - I7 4930K (EK Supremacy )
    GPU: - 2x AMD HD7970 flashed GHZ bios ( EK Acetal Nickel Waterblock H2o)
    Motherboard: Asus x79 Deluxe
    RAM: G-skill Ares C9 2133mhz 16GB
    Main Storage: Samsung 840EVO 500GB / 2x Crucial RealSSD C300 Raid0

  22. #747
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    442
    Quote Originally Posted by kadozer View Post
    This is on multi player http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1592732

    Time to upgrade your cpu? Not saying either of your links is incorrect although the first one is a canned benchmark. The multi player is more cpu intensive.
    You be the judge.
    Wow. And I thought a Q9650 was more powerful than that. My PII 965 achieves 20-30% higher framerate in the same areas (granted it's overclocked), and at that framerate, I see no reason to upgrade to anything higher.

    The Sandy Bridge CPU's are very nice, no doubt about it. Lets see if a GTX 590 can put it to work.
    Last edited by Mad Pistol; 03-21-2011 at 03:23 PM.
    PII 965BE @ 3.8Ghz /|\ TRUE 120 w/ Scythe Gentle Typhoon 120mm fan /|\ XFX HD 5870 /|\ 4GB G.Skill 1600mhz DDR3 /|\ Gigabyte 790GPT-UD3H /|\ Two lovely 24" monitors (1920x1200) /|\ and a nice leather chair.

  23. #748
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Oxford, England
    Posts
    3,433
    That card is going to be so ridiculously hot temperature wise :/
    "Cast off your fear. Look forward. Never stand still, retreat and you will age. Hesitate and you will die. SHOUT! My name is…"
    //James

  24. #749
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    514
    Quote Originally Posted by Jamesrt2004 View Post
    That card is going to be so ridiculously hot temperature wise :/
    Any review !

  25. #750
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Portugal
    Posts
    75
    Quote Originally Posted by Jamesrt2004 View Post
    That card is going to be so ridiculously hot temperature wise :/
    Like an HD6990...

Page 30 of 42 FirstFirst ... 202728293031323340 ... LastLast

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •