Ok,Guys Make no mistake.Effect of 8800gt was the last Effect.no matter what nvidia can do again.AMd & ATI learned everything from Past and Will not allow to repeat event.
Ok,Guys Make no mistake.Effect of 8800gt was the last Effect.no matter what nvidia can do again.AMd & ATI learned everything from Past and Will not allow to repeat event.
CPU : Athlon X2 7850,Clock:3000 at 1.20 | Mobo : Biostar TA790GX A2+ Rev 5.1 | PSU : Green GP535A | VGA : Sapphire 5770 Clock:910,Memory:1300 | Memory : Patriot 2x2 GB DDR2 800 CL 5-5-5-15 | LCD : AOC 931Sw
GTX465 die:
Performance:
Farcry 2 1920x1200 8x AA Max:54fps
Crysis Warhead 1920x1200 VHQ 4x AA:19.9fps
3Dmark Vantage:X5741
Heaven Benchmark 2.0 1920x1200 4xAA:18.8fps
Source:
http://translate.google.com/translat...sl=zh-CN&tl=en
thx for the link!
~10% better than a 285
~same as gtx285
~10% slower than a 285
~25% slower than a 5850
sounds like its going to be a gtx275 with dx11 pretty much...
maybe this is why nvidia EOLd gt200 cards (pretty much) cause they planned to replace them with the cut down gf100 chips...
any infos about ocing and unlocking?
Last edited by saaya; 05-13-2010 at 05:34 AM.
Sucks much? It looks slower than a 5830 which is already horribly overpriced but is cheaper than this?
This should be priced at $200 max, not $250, if these are true!
INTEL Core i7 920 // ASUS P6T Deluxe V2 // OCZ 3G1600 6GB // POWERCOLOR HD5970 // Cooler Master HAF 932 // Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme // SAMSUNG T260 26"Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Core i7 920@ 4.66ghz(H2O)
6gb OCZ platinum
4870x2 + 4890 in Trifire
2*640 WD Blacks
750GB Seagate.
-=The Gamer=-
MSI Z68A-GD65 (G3) | i5 2500k @ 4.5Ghz | 1.3875V | 28C Idle / 65C Load (LinX)
8Gig G.Skill Ripjaw PC3-12800 9-9-9-24 @ 1600Mhz w/ 1.5V | TR Ultra eXtreme 120 w/ 2 Fans
Sapphire 7950 VaporX 1150/1500 w/ 1.2V/1.5V | 32C Idle / 64C Load | 2x 128Gig Crucial M4 SSD's
BitFenix Shinobi Window Case | SilverStone DA750 | Dell 2405FPW 24" Screen
-=The Server=-
Synology DS1511+ | Dual Core 1.8Ghz CPU | 30C Idle / 38C Load
3 Gig PC2-6400 | 3x Samsung F4 2TB Raid5 | 2x Samsung F4 2TB
Heat
yeah, it really does seem odd, doesnt it...
it probably has to do with how they moved the blocks around and tied them together... and ive said it before, i think texturing is what holds gf100 back, they cut down tmus too much...
xbitlabs:
http://www.xbitlabs.com/articles/vid...gtx400_17.html
i read somewhere that the tmus in gf100 work more efficiently, but even then... everything else got doubled up while the tmu perf remained about the same or only increased a little.If we don’t separate gaming graphics cards into single- and multi-GPU ones, the Radeon HD 5970 still remains the king of the hill. The GeForce GTX 480 cannot match it, especially at 2560x1600. Here are the numbers: the GeForce GTX 480 is an average 3% slower at 1600x900, 9% slower at 1920x1080 and as much as 22% slower at 2560x1600. The gap is even as large as 45% in certain tests. The explanation is simple: even the senior model of the new series has a main domain frequency of only 700 MHz. Besides, the number of TMUs has been reduced from 80 in the G200b to 60 in the GF100 whereas the Radeon HD 5970 has 160 TMUs up and running.
and thats a full blown gf100, if a 465 only has 30tmus active then its actually surprising to see that it still beats a 285 with 80tmus, if only by a little...
i disagree though, it does show in other games as well, but not as much... im sure the reason the 470 is only 1-8% faster than a gtx285 in a few games is a result of the tmus as well... just cause2, metro2033, and dirt2 for example seem to all be texturing heavy... and thats where the 470 is barely faster than a 285.Compared to the previous generation, the weaker TMU subsystem only shows up in Wolfenstein OpenGL (gtx470=27%slower than a gtx285). The GeForce GTX 470 is on average 30% faster than the GeForce GTX 285.
the performance is still good, i wouldnt really see that as the main issue, the problem is price perf... for 200$ this would be a great card, especially if it overclocks well and can maybe even get some extra units unlocked...The bottleneck of the GF100 architecture – the low main domain frequency and the cut-down TMU subsystem (the GeForce GTX 470 has only 56 TMUs) – shows up most clearly at 2560x1600. In six out of the 15 tests the GeForce GTX 470 is more than 15% slower than the Radeon HD 5870.
but if you can get a 470 or 5850 for around 350$, and a 5770 for 180$, then why would anybody spend 300$ on a 460?
Last edited by saaya; 05-13-2010 at 10:52 PM.
Intel Core i7 920 4 GHz | 18 GB DDR3 1600 MHz | ASUS Rampage II Gene | GIGABYTE HD7950 3GB WindForce 3X | WD Caviar Black 2TB | Creative Sound Blaster Z | Altec Lansing MX5021 | Corsair HX750 | Lian Li PC-V354
Super silent cooling powered by (((Noiseblocker)))
GTX465:
Core 607Mhz
352 shader 1215Mhz
256bit GDDR5 3206MHz
Benchmarks:
Dirt2
Metro2033
S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Call of Pripyat
Aliens vs Predator
3Dmark Vantage P(PhysX on)
Crysis Warhead
Farcry 2
Tom Clancy's HAWX
Last edited by mindfury; 05-19-2010 at 08:12 AM.
Thanks mindfury
This card seems to fail really hard ...
i think its a good thing they didnt put a 5850 on the charts, would have scared too many people
Bookmarks