The GT300/Fermi Thread - Part 2!

[jaredpace]

Only benchmark & some videos

Collection of Fermi Benchmarks: courtesy phk, asuka, obr, kakkoii, kravis, heise.de, computerbase, expreview, & pctuning.cz




PCB lengths:
HD5870 280mm 28.0cm, 11.02 inches (including backplate & enclosure, 267mm without)
GTX480 267mm 26.7cm, 10.51 inches
GTX470 243mm 24.3cm, 9.56 inches

General performance:
gtx285 75%
hd5850 80%
gtx470 90-95%
hd5870 100%
gtx480 110-115%
hd5970 140%

---------GTX470----------------GTX480----------------GTX470------

---------GTX470----------------GTX480----------------GTX470------


GTX470 Cooler:








~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ GTX 470 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

GTX470 Device ID = NVIDIA_DEV.06C0.01 = "NVIDIA GF100", this part has been in testing since Forceware v185.20 first spotting:
DriverVer = 12/26/2008, 7.15.11.8520 (15 months of testing ~ same timeframe as cypress coming out of TSMC Jan. 09)

core @ 625, shader @ 1255 MHz
RAM @ 1600 MHz, 2000 Mhz
800mhz (phk's sample) / 1000mhz (obr's sample and the final clocks) GDDR5 Samsung modules (possibly 5gbps)
All the 470 benches done at 800mhz memory, final is supposed to be 1000mhz
GF100 main advantage is high-res, high-tessellation, minimum fps

GTX470 VS HD5870 in various games @ high-res, high-aa:
GTX 470 625|1255|800 ------ HD 5870 850|850|1200



Crysis Warhead:




Tom Clancy's HAWX:



Devil May Cry 4:

????????? Havent seen screens for this game yet

World in Conflict:
2560 x 1600 Ultra 4xAA Max
5870(orange) vs. gtx470(light green)
(Ignore the color of "5870" and "GTX4x0" in the top right, colors were inverted for the overlapping image)




Farcry2:
2560 x 1600 Ultra 8xAA Max DX10 min/avg/max
5870: 17/32/55
GTX470: 30/40/67





Stalker Call of Pripryat:
2560 x 1600 Ultra 4xAA Max DX11




Dirt 2 w/ DX11:



3dmark Vantage:

Performance Vantage- P17156 (GTX470)
(compare HD5850/HD5870: 14300/17303) - GTX480 est.: 17156 x 1.2 = P20,500
Extreme Vantage - X7511 (GTX470)
(compare GTX285/HD5850/HD5870: 6002/6430/8730) - GTX480 est.: 7511 x 1.2 = X9013

GTX470 will have a score of 167xx and 73xx, under Performance preset (1280x1048, 1x AA) and Extreme preset (1900x1200, 4xAA) respectively. Which are 13% and 20% faster than GTX285 and is quite competitive when compared to the results of 5870 under Performance preset. GTX470 will have a wide lead in the benchmarks of the DX10 game, Far Cry 2, with 80fps under the following settings: 1920x1200, 4xAA, 16xAF. However, as there are different benchmarks of Far Cry 2, the data is not ideal for making comparisons with other video cards. GTX470 can achieve a frame rate of around 30fps during the DX11 Uniengine Benchmark under 1920x1200, with 4xAA and 16xAF, which is apparently better than the 5870.

Unigine Heaven:

1920x1200 16xaf benchmark
4xAA [fps]: 29/22/27 (GTX470/HD5850/HD5870)
8xAA [fps]: 20/19/23 (GTX470/HD5850/HD5870)





~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ GTX 480 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~








3dMark 2006:

gtx480

hd5870



GTX480 vs. HD5970 Unigine Heaven DX11 Benchmark:
1920 x 1080 0xAA 1xAF

Geforce GTX 480 stock / Core i7 960 @ 3.33ghz / Heaven v. 1.1 ---------------------------

video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vpdPS...eature=related

Radeon HD 5970 stock / Core i7 920 @ 3.78ghz / Heaven v. 1.0 ---------------------------

video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BvvQAQU7Sjg

Heavy Tessellation:
GTX 480: 43 fps / HD 5970: 29 fps

GTX 480: 45 fps / HD 5970: 36 fps


Medium Tessellation:
GTX 480: 44 fps / HD 5970: 57 fps

GTX 480: 50 fps / HD 5970: 60 fps


Very Little Tessellation:
GTX 480: 44 fps / HD 5970: 69 fps

GTX 480: 71 fps / HD 5970: 112 fps


Using Illuminated Logo:
GTX 480: 9001 fps / HD 5970: 0 fps


Here's a Full run to reference the time/framerate on the graph below: (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-tpT6CPeKsE). The toughest scene for the Ati cards is around the 2 minute mark in the benchmark. The camera does a 360 around the heavily tessellated dragon in the early morning sun light, at which point the GTX480 has a higher average framerate than even the OC'ed HD 5970 at the 120 second mark. GF100 is whooping ATI's ass in tessellation. :respect: Must be the 4 triangles per clock? I dunno.


Dark Void – 1920x1200 – AA4x – PhysX
GTX 285: 38.3
GTX 480: 77.6

FarCry 2 – 1920x1200 – AA4x – No physX
GTX 285: 51 FPS
GTX 480: 84 FPS



Ati's response to GTX 480 is the 2GB 5870 "Eyefinity6" that has been sitting on a shelf collecting dust since last summer:




Youtube:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-0iF...layer_embedded





Check out some other interesting (non-rocketsled) vids showcasing GF100 in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jcXmV5Je_gc
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Juxq2tqHyI
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4Ie0t_LkImk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QLu8DyzoVMs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XFgzG9WyGNQ

[Katanai]

Well I hope it will come out already, cause I'm totally bored with the 9800GTX+ I have. Almost bought a 5850 these days, so it will better be released soon and at a decent price or I'll switch camp.

[-Sweeper_]

I wonder if they'll be able to release a full-featured GF100 card with 512 SPs by March.

[GoldenTiger]

I wonder if they'll be able to release a full-featured GF100 card with 512 SPs by March.

I hope so... I want to switch back from my 5870 to the Fermi. I'd think people looking to upgrade should wait considering it's supposedly so close, to see how it all shakes out, in any case.

[Milos-stancene]

Well I hope it will come out already, cause I'm totally bored with the 9800GTX+ I have. Almost bought a 5850 these days, so it will better be released soon and at a decent price or I'll switch camp.

you shoukd

[RaZz!]

rofl, this pic is so full of win

Zotac beat them to it.

this one as well. hehee.

@annihilat0r: it's in the 2nd post in this thread, where all kinds of information is gathered.