Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: AMD Phenom II X4 940BE + GIGABYTE GA-MA790GP-DS4H Benchmark Session Air Cooling

  1. #1
    Team ID - Indonesia
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Jakarta - Indonesia
    Posts
    832

    AMD Phenom II X4 940BE + GIGABYTE GA-MA790GP-DS4H Benchmark Session Air Cooling

    Currently i'm waiting for GA-MA790-UD4H board from GIGABYTE to testing retail Phenom II X4 940 BE, for a mean while in order to make my CPU a little bit "warm", i used the previous version of AMD 790GX chipset from GIGABYTE, GA-MA790GP-DS4H.

    Testing Specification

    Processor AMD Phenom II X4 940 Black Edition Retail Box 0850 CPMW
    Motherboard GIGABYTE GA-MA790GP-DS4H F3i BIOS
    Memory Team Xtreem DDR2-1300 2GB Kit
    VGA GIGABYTE HD4670 512MB
    Hardisk WD2500AAKS 250 GB SATA II
    PSU Gigabyte Odin Pro 1200 Watt
    HSF TRUE + Delta Fan 3000 rpm


    3920 MHz, vcore 1.58 volt Multi Core Benchmark Result







    4000 MHz, 1.6 volt Single Core Benchmark Result









    Suicide shot 4116 MHz



    will be continue with watercooling system and dry ice... and offcourse new board from GIGABYTE
    Last edited by Benny Lodewijk; 01-15-2009 at 01:33 AM.

  2. #2
    Xtreme X.I.P. Particle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    Kansas
    Posts
    3,219
    Very nice. Was this on 32-bit I'm guessing? Cinebench seems low if it's 64-bit.
    Particle's First Rule of Online Technical Discussion:
    As a thread about any computer related subject has its length approach infinity, the likelihood and inevitability of a poorly constructed AMD vs. Intel fight also exponentially increases.

    Rule 1A:
    Likewise, the frequency of a car pseudoanalogy to explain a technical concept increases with thread length. This will make many people chuckle, as computer people are rarely knowledgeable about vehicular mechanics.

    Rule 2:
    When confronted with a post that is contrary to what a poster likes, believes, or most often wants to be correct, the poster will pick out only minor details that are largely irrelevant in an attempt to shut out the conflicting idea. The core of the post will be left alone since it isn't easy to contradict what the person is actually saying.

    Rule 2A:
    When a poster cannot properly refute a post they do not like (as described above), the poster will most likely invent fictitious counter-points and/or begin to attack the other's credibility in feeble ways that are dramatic but irrelevant. Do not underestimate this tactic, as in the online world this will sway many observers. Do not forget: Correctness is decided only by what is said last, the most loudly, or with greatest repetition.

    Rule 3:
    When it comes to computer news, 70% of Internet rumors are outright fabricated, 20% are inaccurate enough to simply be discarded, and about 10% are based in reality. Grains of salt--become familiar with them.

    Remember: When debating online, everyone else is ALWAYS wrong if they do not agree with you!

    Random Tip o' the Whatever
    You just can't win. If your product offers feature A instead of B, people will moan how A is stupid and it didn't offer B. If your product offers B instead of A, they'll likewise complain and rant about how anyone's retarded cousin could figure out A is what the market wants.

  3. #3
    Team ID - Indonesia
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Jakarta - Indonesia
    Posts
    832
    Quote Originally Posted by Particle View Post
    Very nice. Was this on 32-bit I'm guessing? Cinebench seems low if it's 64-bit.
    Yes 32 bit

  4. #4
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    117
    What cooler were you using, thermal interface matirial, fans, open stand or in a case and what case, and what temps were you getting at stock, and your diff voltage increases?

  5. #5
    I am Xtreme
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    10,374
    Pretty scared by them volts, 1.6volts for 4ghz... I hope this a bad sample man
    Question : Why do some overclockers switch into d*ckmode when money is involved

    Remark : They call me Pro Asus Saaya yupp, I agree

  6. #6
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by Leeghoofd View Post
    Pretty scared by them volts, 1.6volts for 4ghz... I hope this a bad sample man
    We have been over this VCore deneb "issue" 100 times before.This chip is not done on intel highk/mg process.This chip doesn't behave the same way as intel 45nm chips. 1.6V is not the "scary" value since default Vcore for Deneb/Shanghai is 1.35V.It may seem high for default vcore but it's just how 45nm SOI works for AMD(and boy it works well). 1.6V is 18% over default,while AMD lists (officially) a 1.55V as a max value for air.

  7. #7
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    New Jersey, Center of the Universe
    Posts
    676
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    .......default Vcore for Deneb/Shanghai is 1.35V.It may seem high for default vcore but it's just how 45nm SOI works for AMD(and boy it works well). 1.6V is 18% over default,while AMD lists (officially) a 1.55V as a max value for air.
    That's cool. I didn't see that anywhere. I feel better now. I always feel guilty juicing the B3s to 1.5 volts (not really ).

    So I guess we'll really be able to run our systems at high speed 24/7 as long as we can cool them. That is really nice....


    BTW, Benny, what kind of temps were you seeing during load?
    Asus M3A79-T W/ PII 720@3.6Ghz DTek Fuzion Water Block
    Raptor X 150G Boot Device & 3 X WD 500GB in RAID 5 Load Device
    8G OCZ Reaper @1066
    2xVisiontek 4870 Xfire @790/1080Mhz w/XPSC Water Blocks
    Razer Barracuda Sound System
    Windows Vista 64 Bit SP1
    LG 24" 1920X1200

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Posts
    33
    Which vcore for the validation at 4116mhz?

    Thx

  9. #9
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Posts
    6,215
    Quote Originally Posted by nanohead View Post
    That's cool. I didn't see that anywhere. I feel better now. I always feel guilty juicing the B3s to 1.5 volts (not really ).

    So I guess we'll really be able to run our systems at high speed 24/7 as long as we can cool them. That is really nice....


    BTW, Benny, what kind of temps were you seeing during load?
    Yes the temps should be monitored and kept as low as possible.Phenom IIs love cold more than voltage,so if one can invest in some good wc setup it could be a very good option.

  10. #10
    Xtreme Enthusiast
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    746
    Finally someone testing on air with high hypertransport.

    Since you seem to be the only one with it so high, Do you think you could test some games with it high and with it lower like 2.0-2.2 to see if there's a difference.

  11. #11
    Team ID - Indonesia
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Jakarta - Indonesia
    Posts
    832
    Quote Originally Posted by daseto View Post
    What cooler were you using, thermal interface matirial, fans, open stand or in a case and what case, and what temps were you getting at stock, and your diff voltage increases?
    I already mention it before. The cooler is Thermalright Ultra 120 Extreme with Delta 3000 rpm fan, no case. For temps, i still confuse. AOD and BIOS report 30 degree both idle and full load , so i think is not correct. Still digging to find out whats wrong with temps report.

    Quote Originally Posted by nanohead View Post
    That's cool. I didn't see that anywhere. I feel better now. I always feel guilty juicing the B3s to 1.5 volts (not really ).

    So I guess we'll really be able to run our systems at high speed 24/7 as long as we can cool them. That is really nice....


    BTW, Benny, what kind of temps were you seeing during load?
    Already answered above

    Quote Originally Posted by MonsterMash View Post
    Which vcore for the validation at 4116mhz?

    Thx
    1.6 volt

    Quote Originally Posted by Caveman787 View Post
    Finally someone testing on air with high hypertransport.

    Since you seem to be the only one with it so high, Do you think you could test some games with it high and with it lower like 2.0-2.2 to see if there's a difference.
    I will try m8

  12. #12
    Xtreme Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    156
    hey there, I'm also using a TRUE 120 extreme with 2 S-Flex's i'm at 3740 @1.425v with 2400 on the NB. I cant get 4ghz no matter how hard I try. 1.6v still seems kinda high for air since you're probably Topping in the Low / Mid 60's?
    AMD Phenom 1055T @ 4.0Ghz
    Asus Crosshair IV 890FX
    Custom Water Loop
    Mushkin Redlines 1600
    XFX 5870 900c/1300m
    Intel X-25M 80GB SATA
    Western Digital 400GB SATA
    Corsair 1000HX

  13. #13
    Xtreme Mentor
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    cleveland ohio
    Posts
    2,879
    Quote Originally Posted by informal View Post
    Yes the temps should be monitored and kept as low as possible.Phenom IIs love cold more than voltage,so if one can invest in some good wc setup it could be a very good option.
    yeah once you hit above certain voltage point the chip won't get in to windows.

    I've gotten up to about 3,885mhz into windows. Keeping the chip cool seem to the best way to go.
    HAVE NO FEAR!
    "AMD fallen angel"
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamekiller View Post
    You didn't get the memo? 1 hour 'Fugger time' is equal to 12 hours of regular time.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •