There is a new driver out http://www.nvidia.com/object/winxp64_163.69.htmlOriginally Posted by i found nemo
There is a new driver out http://www.nvidia.com/object/winxp64_163.69.html
i'll give it a shot, but i'm using 32 bit vers. but yea i got xp/media edition version of the driver instead
mobo: strix b350f
gpu: rx580 1366/2000
cpu: ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
ram: 32 gb gskill 2400 @ 3000
psu: coarsair 1kw
hdd's: samsung 500gb ssd 1tb & 3tb hdd
nope
mobo: strix b350f
gpu: rx580 1366/2000
cpu: ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
ram: 32 gb gskill 2400 @ 3000
psu: coarsair 1kw
hdd's: samsung 500gb ssd 1tb & 3tb hdd
i found nemo 3650 single card single core cpu single channel
wow worst part is, even i'm single
mobo: strix b350f
gpu: rx580 1366/2000
cpu: ryzen 1700 @ 3.8ghz
ram: 32 gb gskill 2400 @ 3000
psu: coarsair 1kw
hdd's: samsung 500gb ssd 1tb & 3tb hdd
unmodded 8800ultra @ stock air cooling
lets see some HD 4000/200 GTX
Last edited by NapalmV5; 07-12-2008 at 09:29 PM.
Toysoldier HD4870 = (18659 points) [q] xx
It gives the same score with CF enabled/disabled, so no CF score
This is with autotune and cards running at 860/1000
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X
ASRock Radeon RX 7900 XTX Phantom Gaming OC
Asus ROG Strix B550-F Gaming Motherboard
Corsair RM1000x SHIFT PSU
32 GB DDR4 @3800 MHz CL16 (4 x 8 GB)
1x WD Black SN850 1 TB
1 x Samsung 960 250 GB
2 x Samsung 860 1 TB
1x Segate 16 TB HDD
Dell G3223Q 4K UHD Monitor
Running Windows 11 Pro x64 Version 23H2 build 22631.2506
Smartphone : Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra
heres my initial score with asus top bios...
Seraphiel 8800 Ultra = ( 18040 points ) [q] xx
Intel QX6700 @ stock
XFX 8800 Ultra XXX 685M SLI @ stock
Last edited by Seraphiel; 08-17-2008 at 10:26 AM.
E3110 @ 4.23ghz
4850 @ 880/1150
|| 2500K @ 5GHz 1 thread, 4.8 2 threads, 4.7 3, 4.6 4 1.284V ||
|| P8P67-M Pro || 8GB @ 2133MHz ||
|| 5850 @ 1000/1225 || XFX 650W || Silverstone FT03B ||
|| 37" LCD TV || CM Hyper 212+ || Samsung 2.1 Soundbar ||
sheesh xfire and sli make all the difference in the world.. wow..
my poor GTX280 only got like 8500 points.
"These are the rules. Everybody fights, nobody quits. If you don't do your job I'll kill you myself.
Welcome to the Roughnecks"
"Anytime you think I'm being too rough, anytime you think I'm being too tough, anytime you miss-your-mommy, QUIT!
You sign your 1248, you get your gear, and you take a stroll down washout lane. Do you get me?"
Heat Ebay Feedback
I am using a single card....
|| 2500K @ 5GHz 1 thread, 4.8 2 threads, 4.7 3, 4.6 4 1.284V ||
|| P8P67-M Pro || 8GB @ 2133MHz ||
|| 5850 @ 1000/1225 || XFX 650W || Silverstone FT03B ||
|| 37" LCD TV || CM Hyper 212+ || Samsung 2.1 Soundbar ||
single 4870 1GB @ 895/945 cat8.9
Last edited by NapalmV5; 09-19-2008 at 03:35 PM.
no mods, Sapphire 4870 512, 100% fan
888/5000
Last edited by Xcel; 09-20-2008 at 07:05 AM.
9800gx2 700/2050/1750 =]
- ASUS P5E (BIOS 1201+Microcode Update) 400 FSB - Intel E8500@3.8GHZ (1.28750 VCORE) - Thermalright HR120 Extreme - 8GB Corsair PC28500CS (1066 3:4) - 2*2TB Samsung -
- EVGA GTX580 3GB - PCP&C 750W - Antec P-182SE - Plextor PX-760A - Plextor PX-W5224A - Samsung 245T - Razer Mamba - Razer Black Widow Ultimate - Razer Megalodon -
is this why no one posted 3870 scores..
all air
Last edited by NapalmV5; 10-13-2008 at 01:00 AM.
I don't really trust open GL benches, they don't seem to scale well across multi gpusToysoldier HD4870 = (18659 points) [q] xx
It gives the same score with CF enabled/disabled, so no CF score
Sorry, but i think this test is flawed. FireGL 8600 getting greatly outperformed by these margin in OpenGL benchmarks should not be.....
come on death!
why are there no rv770 or gt200 scores in the list?
FireGL and Quadro cards are not faster then normal graphic cards, but they do it more accurately which sometimes even cost performance. However the 8600 FireGL is based of the HD 2900xt which could answer a couple of questions.
I dont know too much about ATI, always been an Nvidia fan. We just invested into it b/c of its superior value over Nvidia. I would never think it would get such a low bench however, underclocked or not, its a $1400 card
Unfortunately you dont pay for the performance, its for the drivers, support and memory capacity. As i said, 'professional' cards are not faster then their desktop part in example games. Its still the same chip. The difference comes in 'professional' programs such as CAD or other simulation software. Unlike the desktop cards which loads the model in the CPU memory, pro cards loads the model in the graphic memory which is a huge boost for those types of calculations. This is also why pro cards often has several GB of memory. Both drivers and software must be made with this in mind. Also those who mostly use these kinds of software and pro cards are companies and not normal people at home. Which leads to fewer cards will be sold, so they need to raise the price for profit.
Bottom line is that don't think that you made the wrong investment. Some software require professional graphic cards for some features to work. Features that can double your efficiency. Maybe you doubt ATI and ive made this long post for nothing. If you look at benchmarks that matters, FireGLs are both better and cheaper then Nvidias Quadros.
^didn't think it would be such an extreme slow down in openGL benchmarks since thats what they are intended for. I have seen benchmarks before with ATI vs. NVIDIA and ATI is superior for the $$ by far. I have no real regrets in buying the card for our purposes except the fact that the drivers are not certified with UGNX and it causes quite a few glitches with the display.
Yes, but you are still comparing a HD2900XT against a HD4870.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks