Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 58 of 58

Thread: AMD RS780 is 261% Faster Than AMD 690G in 3DMark06

  1. #51
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    Cool, it will have 64 and 128Mb versions.
    I want to see a review of the 128mb version with overclock

  2. #52
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,550

  3. #53
    Fused
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Malaysia
    Posts
    2,769
    Quote Originally Posted by KoHaN69 View Post
    Sorry thats not AMD RS780 board

  4. #54
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    82
    Quote Originally Posted by Calmatory View Post
    Which 7300GT falls under 1200 3dmarks? Mine goes over 2000 marks with all stock with 2GHz "Sempron X2". :|

    Though.. mine has GDDR3 + factory OC. ;_;
    Well actually only 7300GS is the real budget Card based on G72. 7300GT is actually based on the 12pipe G73 chip with 4 deactivated, what makes still 8 pipes. Far from a Budget Card, its a mainstreampart, sometimes even faster than lower clocked 7600GS.
    They brought the GT as a interim Solution because of strong competition from the x1300pro and xt. but its not a card to make money with since g73 is a expensive mainstreamchip not meant for low end.
    U could compare the integrated graphics with G72, but since this has only 4 pipes like 6200 and not 8 like 7300GT ist useless as it will loose out to almost anything.


    RS780 is a nice Chipset and it looks a lot smaller than MCP78. Thats a huge plus for AMD since it means its also cheaper for them. I guess that the dedicated Ram feature is pretty good for oems, especially in notebooks as you can build nearly the same sku with or without ram.

    From the ocworkbenchtests i conclude that Ram performance with integrated graphics activated is way up. So the GPU doesn't suck much from the system ram, maybe there is some limitation fpor the bandwith which is dedicated to the GPU.

    Also the ram interface is really lowcost only 32 bit. thats half of the ultralowend 2400pro. It doesn't take up much transistors or heat, so its not that bad if u don't use it.
    AMD uses a mechanism to dedicate 32bit of the main Ram bandwith to the graphics and the 32bit onboard memory doubles that to 64bit (2 channels wide). Thats the same as on a 2400pro. Also if u got 64mb onboard u have a full of 128mb 64 bit graphics ram. If u solder 128mb on the board u already have 256mb which should be more than enough for the power the chip has. U don't need more since the Chip doesn't handel higher tecture grades.

    I bet notebook manufacturers will love this Chipset. Now AMD should hurry with its griffin and they have a good team. If they can't defeat Intel in the highend wuadcore market they need to fight where it hurts Intel the most - in the Notebook space. But since 45nm CPUs will also come to the MObile Front, Griffin needs to be a heck of a mobile CPU to stand up against that. I don't expect better performance on that segmewnt, but they should at least deliver better performance per watt with griffin. (chipset+gpu included)
    Last edited by davidzo; 01-27-2008 at 03:20 PM.

  5. #55
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Posts
    1,550
    Quote Originally Posted by tictac View Post
    Sorry thats not AMD RS780 board
    RX780 chipset

    Damn, thats confusing

  6. #56
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    above USA...below USSR
    Posts
    1,186
    heres the full roadmap of the RD7xx chipsets, http://forums.vr-zone.com/showthread.php?t=231020

    looks like i will be looking for an HD3300 in my next lappy
    Case-Coolermaster Cosmos S
    MoBo- ASUS Crosshair IV
    Graphics Card-XFX R9 280X [out for RMA] using HD5870
    Hard Drive-Kingston 240Gig V300 master Seagate 160Gb slave Seagate 250Gb slave Seagate 500Gb slave Western Digital 500Gb
    CPU-AMD FX-8320 5Ghz
    RAM 8Gig Corshair c8
    Logitech 5.1 Z5500 BOOST22
    300Gb of MUSICA!!


    Steam ID: alphamonkeywoman
    http://www.techpowerup.com/gpuz/933ab/

  7. #57
    Xtreme Cruncher
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Flushing, NY
    Posts
    717
    thats a big jump in performance

    maybe i can use this for my parents computer
    Nikon User
    Nikon D200 (Gone =( )/D300
    Nikkor 18-105mm(Gone) // Nikkor 50mm 1.8 // Nikkor 55-200VR(Gone)
    Tokina 12-24 // Tamron 90mm //
    Manfrotto & Benro Legs // Benro Ballhead.

    Current Lust = 80-200 Or 70-200VR1 <--Pending


    No more computer parts for me... Well for now until I
    really REALLY need to upgrade.

  8. #58
    Xtreme Addict
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Posts
    1,084
    This RS780G is simply a revolution in IGP market:

    Review RS780 + RD790 + NF590
    This model has 64Mb of sideport memory + HD 3200 + SB 700

    2d/3d rendering:





    Media Encoding Performance:




    System Memory Performance:




    HDD:





    Gaming:







    Decoding:
    H.264



    VC1



    http://diy.yesky.com/mainboard/135/7784135.shtml
    http://translate.google.com/translat...pt-PT&ie=UTF-8

    With the overclocking capabilities that this chip7 offers easly it breaks an HD 2400Pro, and this is not even the top model because it only has HD 3200 in it.
    The Top model -> RS780D will have an HD 3300 IGP and sideport from 64Mb to 128Mb.
    The title of this tread is not just Fud, this board rock.
    Last edited by v_rr; 02-01-2008 at 03:59 PM.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •