0401 at maximus formula se
interesting sounds like non-supporting yorkie bios might think the QX9650 is 1066MHz bus cpu and default to 266FSB strap latencies versus 1333FSB bus cpus ???
---
Asus Crosshair V Formula-Z | FX 8350 | 2x4GB Trident-X 2600 C10 | 2x ATI HD5870 Crossfire | Enermax Revo 1050watt | OCZ Vertex 3 60GB | Samsung F1 1TB
Watercooling: XSPC Raystorm | EK 5870 Delrin fullcover | TFC X-changer 480 w/ 4x Gentle Typhoon | DDC2+ Delrin top | EK 200mm res | Primochill LRT 3/8 tubing
Case: Murdermodded TJ-07
sub 9 sec. SPi1M 940BE 955BE 965BE 1090T
with this, first sub 10 score at 4515.....
maybe 266FSB Strap for 1066Mhz bus cpus is different from 266FSB Strap for 1333mhz bus cpus.
---
It can't be faster consistently unless it involves lowering some hidden latencies somewhere. That's all that can really happen but good to know. Cheers.
I think that it has to do with the "instractions" of the CPU given and nothing more.....Maybe it doesn't work it's SSE3 or something like that....Who knows....?....
INTEL PWA FOR EVER
Dr. Who my arss...
.........
ah...yes, I remembered, my 5689mhz 7.969sec is done on Blitz Extreme 0804 bios.
but after I update to 0904...I never reached that speed ag.
i'm too lazy to flash back the bios
Buy a new motherboard
Ok, no more jokes
This thing is weird.
What's making the SuperPi 1M faster ( with older BIOS ) and 32M slower at the same time ?
Instructions can't be, because as far I remember SuperPi uses only the SSE instructions ( the 1.5 XS version ) [ not SSE2/SSE3/SSSE3/SSE4 ]...nothing new here.
What could it be ?
Somebody checked if the same thing happens with a C2Q KF ( KentsField ) ?
Just to check if it's just the newer BIOS degrading the 1M performance anyway.
Coding 24/7... Limited forums/PMs time.
-Justice isn't blind, Justice is ashamed.
Many thanks to: Sue Wu, Yiwen Lin, Steven Kuo, Crystal Chen, Vivian Lien, Joe Chan, Sascha Krohn, Joe James, Dan Snyder, Amy Deng, Jack Peterson, Hank Peng, Mafalda Cogliani, Olivia Lee, Marta Piccoli, Mike Clements, Alex Ruedinger, Oliver Baltuch, Korinna Dieck, Steffen Eisentein, Francois Piednoel, Tanja Markovic, Cyril Pelupessy (R.I.P. ), Juan J. Guerrero
Only difference i found was:old/new
Read delay phase adjust : +1/normal
dim 1 clock fine delay 7t/9t
dim 2 clock fine delay 2t/5t
dim 3 clock fine delay 6t/9t
dim 4 clock fine delay 2t/5t
but personaly i don't think that is making the difference to the 0.3 sec
@Rol-Co or someone else, can you please take screenshots of MCHBAR sequences for me? If yes, just drop me a pm, and I'll explain how to do.
Dunno but may be I can identify what's going on.
Last edited by before; 12-17-2007 at 09:43 AM.
Best Regards,
Xavier
"I prefer to fly alone... when alone, I perform those little coups of audacity which amuse me..." Col. René Fonck (1894-1953), the Ace of Aces.
Have you seen 500 fsb yorkie 32mpi stable scores?
I've played with this cpu and get some Vic's comparable scores, (higher fsb, lower ddr3, strap 200). I'll try better ddr3 soon.
500x9 32m pi
500x8 32m pi
1m pi don't likes me or I don't know some tweaks, get just near 11,5 at 500x. don't try 804 bios atm.
Has someone figured out why that particular bios is so much faster?
Anywho, thought I posted these here: graphs from 499 45nm chips (DDR2/3 split up counts 115+233=348 results):
Now, I have made a few drawings on some of the graphs as well, as it seems that something rather weird is happening, at least it looks weird to me .
This is the graph which shows the Mhz vs 1M information. Normally, all these points should be representated by 1 y= comparison, however it seems that there are two comparisons instead of one.
Performance product. Here we seem to spot two groups of performance products, why?. If you look at the DDR2/3 split up graph, you see it has nothing to do with the ram. It seems like there's an empty space between 45500 and 46000
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
Any of you noticed a difference in memory performance that is related to a boot FSB? Not like a cut-off as it was for P965 chipset, but sometimes a particular FSB, I mean a single FSB value among others gives far more bandwidth than expected...
I have posted it in another thread, but nobody seems to be interested because I've got no reply; BTW it might be something important to look at.
Ok; I experienced that while investigating MSI P35D3 functionning, but maybe it exists for other brands with P35 chipset.
Best Regards,
Xavier
"I prefer to fly alone... when alone, I perform those little coups of audacity which amuse me..." Col. René Fonck (1894-1953), the Ace of Aces.
I hope its not my eyesight massman, but are your graphs really showing sub 44750 with DDR2?
Is this only Kev by any chance as well?
Sub 45k:
Edit: I do not have all 1M's of course, so there might be even more sub45k's out there. I have used HWbot's and Ripping.org's data along with some scores of OCX/XS/Cooaler.Code:Name Score Cpu Memory PP cpu OPB 7,735 5739,4 551,9 44394 OPB 7,89 5657,7 638,5 44639 OPB 8,25 5412,4 563,8 44652 Rolco 11,234 4000,2 640 44938 OPB 7,468 5913,8 844,8 44164 OPB 7,578 5811 1020,3 44036 OPB 7,578 5811,6 715,3 44040 (maybe DDR2, not sure) Victor 9,469 4750,4 950,1 44982 Coola 7,813 5746,4 44897
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
Nice tweak Rol-Co, i m going to try it on maximus Extreme
... if first bios doesnt reconize correctly the yorkfield.
Last edited by Pt1t; 01-12-2008 at 08:10 AM.
Where courage, motivation and ignorance meet, a persistent idiot awakens.
Bookmarks